An Effort to Protect Yourself from Chemtrail Poisoning

Live Link:  Surviving the Middle Class Crash

Drina Brooke, certified community herbalist

“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”

Such is Ben Franklin’s saying. How true it is! He was talking about fire prevention, but the analogy can surely be applied to health. Especially when it comes to heavy metal and chemical exposure, the body’s immune, nervous and endocrine systems may likely be worn down faster than therapies can build them back up, though there is some individual variation (see quote at the conclusion of this article). That said, there is also a lot we can do to protect ourselves from the exposure in the first place, and to rejuvenate the body once the exposure has taken place. It just takes time, that’s all, and a physician’s supervision if a health injury has actually occurred. But let’s not go there. Instead, the focus of this article is how you can take extra precautions to shield yourself from heavy metal poisoning from chemtrails, assuming that you are a healthy individual. Because people on the Surviving the Middle Class Crash and Speak Truth 2 Power sites have expressed concern, I thought I would offer a thought or two about this.

Let’s first take a look at the contents of chemtrail sprays. Then we will know what we are up against, and how to proceed further with strengthening the body’s defenses (which is absolutely never a guarantee that no health injury can occur, especially where chemtrail exposure is concerned. Only a precautionary measure).

Literature available about chemtrails may be controversial and conflicting, but that of course may be reason in itself to raise some querying eyebrows.

According to Aajonus Vonderplanitz, Ph.D. www.mayanmajix.com/art2152.html :

“Laboratory examination of those chemicals found that they were manufacturing wastes from military industry and biowarfare substances. In several laboratory analyses, the composition of chemtrails was revealed: 

1. Aluminum barium
2. Aluminum Oxide
3. Bacilli and Molds  

4. Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
5. Pseudomonas Florescens
6. Bacilli Amyloliquefaciens
7. Streptomyces
8. Enterobacteriaceae
9. Serratia Marcscens
10. Human white Blood Cells-A restrictor enzyme used in research labs to snip and combine DNA
11. Enterobacter Cloacal
12. Other Bacilli and other toxic molds capable of producing heart disease and meningitis as well as acute upper respiratory and gastrointestinal distress.
13. Carcinogen Zinc Cadmium Sulfide.

READ MORE

Haitian Farmers Say “Burn Monsanto’s Seeds”:Canadian groups support Haitian rejection of Monsanto’s seed donation

 

For Immediate Release 

Thursday, June 3, 2010 – Today farmer and environmental groups from across Canada stated their support for tomorrow’s farmer march in Haiti, organized to protest a donation of 475 tons of hybrid corn and vegetable seeds from the U.S.-based multinational biotechnology corporation Monsanto. The seeds will be distributed by the U.S. government aid agency to Haiti’s farmers. 

Tomorrow, Friday June 4, in Montreal, representatives from groups including Union Paysanne, Action SOS Haiti, the Canadian Biotechnology Action Network, HAITI: One Seed One Land, and Greenpeace will hold a symbolic solidarity action outside the Haitian Consulate and deliver a letter in support of the farmers.

Chavannes Jean-Baptist of the Peasant Movement of Papay (MPP) in Haiti called Monsanto’s donation “a new earthquake.” MPP organized the protest march for tomorrow and has called on all of Haiti’s farmers to burn Monsanto’s seeds. “If people start sending us hybrid seeds that’s the end of Haitian agriculture,” said Chavannes. 

When meat is not murder

Live Link: UK Guardian

Ian Sample, science correspondent

Would you eat steak if it had been grown in a petri dish?

It is the ultimate conundrum for vegetarians who think that meat is murder: a revolution in processed food that will see fresh meat grown from animal cells without a single cow, sheep or pig being killed.

Researchers have published details in a biotechnology journal describing a new technique which they hailed as the answer to the world’s food shortage. Lumps of meat would be cultured in laboratory vats rather than carved from livestock reared on a farm.

Candian livestock producers successfully lured into NAIS and RFID

It would appear that Canadian Cattle producers have been successfully led into the trap of RFID tagging for their livestock.  Using the same phony PR used by the USDA here in the states, a corporation which is also quite active in Canadian agriculture, NAIS is alive and well and headed our way.  And you thought this dog was run out!

Marti__________________________________________

© 2010 Business Information Group. A member of the esourceNetwork

Farm Business Communications,  5/29/2010

---

Bar-coded cattle ID tags de-listed July 1

By Staff

Any bar-coded dangle tags still hanging from Canadian cattle’s ears will officially become plastic jewelry effective July 1.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency, which was previously expected to de-list bar code tags as of Jan. 1, 2010, said Friday that the bar code tags will be de-listed July 1 in favour of radio frequency identification (RFID) tags.

Starting July 1, all cattle must be tagged with approved RFID tags before they move from their current locations or leave their farms of origin.

“Although this change may be an additional one- time process for some producers, the ability to easily capture information from the RFID tags will help all producers in the long run,” said Darcy Eddleston, a Paradise Valley, Alta. producer and chairman of the Canadian Cattle Identification Agency (CCIA), in a joint CFIA/CCIA release.

“We have worked with government to move forward on traceability and we believe that de- listing the bar-coded tag will advance traceability initiatives.”

Remember the GM Tryptophan that killed 37 and permanently disabled 1500?

By Barbara H. Peterson

Farm Wars

Genetic modification disturbs normal cellular functioning. This fact cannot be argued. The process of genetic engineering is dangerous simply because there is an assumption made that the cells that are genetically modified will be substantially equivalent to their counterparts, which are grown normally. This is patently absurd! Excuse the pun.

Look, here is how I see it. If I shoot you in the leg, leaving a gaping hole, then you heal up, is your leg ever the same as before the shot? NO!!!

Okay, let’s take this one step further. If a plant cell is either shot with gold particles coated with GM DNA, or has a team of genetically modified Agrobacteria set loose on it to infect it with the GM DNA, will it ever be the same? EVER?? NO!!!!!

In fact, they have no idea what will happen because, just like your leg, not one cell will heal in exactly the same way, and we will never know just how many deformities will occur, or how many side effects will be released into the environment. Take for example the ability for GM bacteria to produce a ‘toxic to humans’ poison and inject it into our food simply due to the way a bacterial cell ‘healed’ after transformation.

It is the genetic modification process itself that is dangerous. As in the Tryptophan case cited in the linked article, “there is no reasonable explanation how a highly toxic chemical could appear “out of the air” and this has never occurred before in this kind of production. Tens of thousands of similar manufacturing units have been producing millions of tons of medical substances (penicillin being the most famous), since more than fifty years without the appearance of any unwanted highly toxic chemical impurity in any case.”

“This fact is in itself very strong evidence in favour of the alternative that it was the [GM] bacteria that caused the emergence of the poison and nothing else.”

Here is the Tryptophan article. If you want to know more about the genetic engineering process, go to http://aggie.farmwars.info, or click the colorful Aggie banner on the sidebar, and view the full 35 page preview of “The Adventures of Aggie the Traveling Agrobacterium – A GMO Primer.“

(C) 2010 Barbara H. Peterson

GM Tryptophan- EMS-Killed 37 and Permanently Disabled 1500 People

Source: Genetically Modified Foods, The Silent Killer

Date: June, 2007

The Showa Denko Tryptophan disaster
Genetic Engineering
The Disaster

The tryptophan disaster in the end of the 1980′s and beginning of 1990′s killed 37 and permanently disabled 1,500 people in the United States in a disease called eosonophil myalgia syndrome (EMS).

It was caused by one or more extremely poisonous substances present in a tryptophan food supplement, which was produced by genetically engineered bacteria at the Japanese firm Showa Denko.

Showa Denko destroyed the evidence that could have been used to determine the scientific cause of the problem. They destroyed the genetically engineered bacterial stocks, along with any potentially surviving specks that investigators might have recovered from the walls or the equipment in their facilities.

Was the poison created by the bacteria?

Flash Bulletin: Corexit is Killing the Gulf

 

J. Speer-Williams (c) copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved

_____________________________________________

Let us set aside the possibility of provable gross criminal negligence of governmental regulators and oil company executives allowing the worse humanly caused catastrophe in world history.

Now, let us focus on the greater and utterly provable crimes committed by US regulators and BP (British Petroleum) executives immediately following the blow-out of the Gulf of Mexico oil well.

Please read the following seven paragraphs slowly and carefully to completely understand the enormity of these crimes.

BP, with governmental approval, was so quick to dump hundreds of thousand of gallons of their toxic chemical dispersant, Corexit 9500, at their undersea wellhead and on surface waters that they must have expected a blow out.