Unconstitutional Agenda – Obamas Plan For A New World Order

Barb

The USDA…An unelected bureaucracy gone wild.

The USDA is an unelected bureaucracy which seems to have come to its own conclusions regarding the law and is busying itself with attempting to implement the illegal and unconstitutional National Animal Identification System.

 

Because the proposed system is blatantly unconstitutional and a direct assault on our right to own private property and to be free of encumbrance or interference from the government as long as our activity remains lawful and legal, I began wondering just how USDA and its globalist, corporate pandering, minions were intending to not only implement but to also enforce this illegal attack on private homes and businesses. 

 

How does an agency of the federal government set about avoiding a conflict with the Constitution and its Bill of Rights, and implement a program that assaults and renders as useless those very same rights? 

 

Please look at the list below and see if you can find any law, any proposed bill, or in fact any indication that we even have a congress that might have had a say in this.  These of course are not all the players and this list does not include the Frankenfood corporations like Monsanto and Syngenta among many others, but it should give you a clear picture of how the USDA intends to circumvent the Constitution and your rights to be left alone by government: to be secure in papers, person and effects.

 

• International Animal Court Treaty
• International Criminal Court
• International property Code
• International Standards.org
• International Committee on Animal Standards
• International Standards for Electric Identification of Animals
• World Organization for Animal Health
• International Phytosanitary Agreements
• World Trade Organization

 

This is kind of like finding Waldo…..only the Waldo in this puzzle is congress and they are no where to be found.  No mention of US laws or the Constitution either. 

 

Everyone of these organizations or treaty’s is directly tied to the World Trade Organization. 

 

The World Trade Organization is tied to the World Bank  

 

The World Bank is tied to the International Monetary Fund

 

All of these are subject to the International Criminal Court

 

And every treaty, organization, trade organization, bank, money handler, committee, standard and code is all tied to AGENDA 21 from the United Nations.

 

The USDA has neither the power nor the legitimacy to mandate or attempt to make mandatory any program or plan that is derived from international policies and agendas intended to usurp and replace Constitutional laws and protections and rights.  These international laws, codes and regulations are being utilized specifically because our laws would prohibit not only implementation, but enforcement.  Enforcement, by necessity requires lawful validation which could not be gained under US laws or the Constitution.

 

The recent Federal Register entry, January 13, 2009 citing the USDA’s claim that mandatory implementation will supersede and preempt any local or state laws that have been passed allowing NAIS registration to be only voluntary an dnow making it mandatory, is null on its face.

 

The USDA is nothing more than an agency and as such cannot lawfully make such a declaration.  The 10th and 14th Amendments gives states rights over those of the government.  In this case, this is only an agency of the government…..not Congress or the President.  And it is one of these two only, who can legislate or pass laws which must be attended by the population.  The USDA, no matter how grandiose their thinking, is neither of these bodies.

 

And, no matter what international plan or organization is hiding behind this infringement on our sovereignty, we as American citizens are bound by one set of laws originating from the Constitution.  If the USDA is so enamored with international organizations, holding them in higher regard than our own Constitution then please let me be the first to invite each and every one of them, including Colin Peterson (D) MN and Tom Harkin(D) IA, to take their leave. 

 

I’ll help raise the money for tickets to anywhere you want to go…..as long as it is far, far away from the US.

 

© 2009 Marti Oakley

 

NAIS and the International Criminal Court

By: Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2009

 

There are times when I am researching a subject that something just jumps out at me because it is out of place, seemingly unconnected to the issue, or seems totally irrelevant.  Sometimes, gut instinct tells me to pursue it and see where it leads.  This is what happened with an unusual comment made By Bruce Knight of the USDA.

On June 8, 2007, Under-Secretary of Agriculture Bruce Knight, speaking at the World Pork Expo in Des Moines, Iowa, said, “We have to live by the same international rules we’re expecting other people to do.” (end quote)

Knight was referring to the return and adherence to the International Criminal Court: a global court which cedes itself the right to act with impunity and with no adherence to national or local laws, but only to the laws it has created itself……and not for your benefit. 

Bruce Knight was promoting the National Animal Identification System known as NAIS.  What could the International Criminal Court have to do with that?

In every instance in the Draft National Animal Identification System Users Guide, land is referred to as a premises.  A “Premises” has no protection under the Constitution of the United States, while property indicates exclusive private ownership and is protected by the Constitution.

This is where the return to the ICC comes in.  The ICC is in part modeled on the Vienna Diplomatic Relations Conventions where [premises] is defined globally and with a global use intended with no recognition afforded to the rights of private individuals, national laws or protections, or the rights or recognition to private property ownership. 

[At this point we have to remember the use of UN Agenda 21 mandates regarding rules and guidelines in NAIS, and now we add one more point of interest to 21:  It calls for the complete ownership of all lands to be held by the [state] citing land as a source of wealth and one that should not be held by the common individual.] 

Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the International Criminal Court

 

3.1.2 Ownership and control of property privileges Description  

 “premises to mean the buildings or parts of buildings and the land ancillary (connected to or existing as) thereto, irrespective of ownership, used for the purpose of…”. The word “premises” includes a place and a conveyance in this section. Conveyance is the transfer of ownership of real property from the original owner to another… such as land….such as what happens when you sign up for Premises ID under NAIS and CONVEY ownership and control of your land and livestock to the USDA acting as agent for the federal government.

[Now we know how and why the word [premises] was used.  The word premises is not only a redefinition of ownership and control within our legal system, but now under the International Criminal Court is also globally recognized and eliminates our private property rights and makes our own laws unavailable to us.]

Sect 3.2.1 cont.

As reflected in the discussions of the ICC Preparatory Commission Working Group, “the concept of legal capacity means that States (countries, provinces, commonwealths, or sovereign nations) will not subject the Court to national jurisdiction or legislation, and the Court will consult national authorities when it needs to act. Implementing legislation should not restrict the Court in the exercise of its functions or fulfillment of its purpose and should reflect the fact the Court is not subject to national law.”

States may need to ensure steps are taken to guarantee the Court will have the capacity that may be necessary to exercise its functions and fulfillment of its purpose in that State, such as the capacity to contract, acquire and dispose of property and participate in national legal proceedings.”  ICC codes reports.

There is far more to this, but you get the idea: Bruce Knight was advocating a return to the International Court System because it would facilitate the NAIS.  It would do this by ignoring Constitutional laws and rights, substituting global efforts to seize privately held lands and material property and any suits brought against state or federal agencies attempting to force NAIS would now be directed to the ICC…..where the individual is not recognized as owning or controlling property. 

Think they can’t get away with this?  Well..here is a law from 1949 that says they can and you can’t do anything about it.

Agreement on Privilege and Immunities of the Organisation of American States.

 

Now…….on to the “World Conservation Bank”…….another piece of the global wealth puzzle.

© 2009 Marti Oakley

 

Representative Serrano (D) NY, wants to end term limits for presidents.

The term limits on presidents is one of the few tools we have to protect us from lifers who envision themselves as kings.  Even after eight years they come to believe they are infallible.  Write to congressman Serrano and tell him to withdraw this bill!

No public official should be allowed to serve more than two terms.  Look what career politicians have brought us.  We should not only maintain the current limits onpresidents, but extend that to congress as a whole and to the Supreme Court.  NO ONE should be given a lifetime appointment to any political office or allowed to transform their office into a lifetime career. 

 

 

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.J.RES.5.IH:

 

 

H.J.RES.5
Title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.
Sponsor: Rep Serrano, Jose E. [NY-16] (introduced 1/6/2009)      Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual… (Introduced in House)

HJ 5 IH

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. J. RES. 5

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 6, 2009

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

---

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

`Article–

`The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.’.

 

 

WE CANNOT ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN!  Contact Rep. Serrano here:

 

WASHINGTON OFFICE

2227 Rayburn House Office Building

Washington, D.C. 20515-3216

(202) 225-4361

Fax: (202) 225-6001

 

BRONX OFFICE

788 Southern Blvd.

Bronx, New York 10455

(718) 620-0084

Fax: (718) 620-0658

 

Charles Key on Radio Free Oklahoma 1/2/09

Announcement from axiomuse:

http://axiomuse.wordpress.com  

Radio Free Oklahoma 1/2/09 Interviews Oklahoma State Rep. Charles Key

December 30, 2008 ·

 Charles Key will be a guest  Radio Free Oklahoma 1/2/09.  He is scheduled for the first portion of the show and will give his thoughts on the Tenth Amendment Resolution, anti-Real ID legislation and current political situation in Oklahoma and tell us about the “Citizens Assembly for Oklahoma Sovereignty” to be held on 1/2/09 in OKC beginning at 7pm.

The show is now broadcast on FOUR FM stations in Oklahoma [107.1FM – OKC / 91.1 FM – Tulsa / 93.5 – Durant / 95.3 FM – Guthrie ]
along with our flagship station on Austin, TX – 90.1 FM and one in the west side of Madison, WI. 

http://axiomamuse.wordpress.com/2008/12/30/important-notice/

 www.ruleoflawradio.com

From The Oklahoma Rebellion by Walter E. Williams

Federal usurpation goes beyond anything the Constitution’s framers would have imagined. James Madison, explaining the constitution, in Federalist Paper 45, said, “The powers delegated … to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, [such] as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce. … The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people.” Thomas Jefferson emphasized that the states are not “subordinate” to the national government, but rather the two are “coordinate departments of one simple and integral whole. … The one is the domestic, the other the foreign branch of the same government.”  [. . . ]One of the more disgusting sights for me to is to watch a president, congressman or federal judge take an oath to uphold and defend the United States Constitution, when in reality they either hold constitutional principles in contempt or they are ignorant of those principles.
 
State efforts, such as Oklahoma’s, create a glimmer of hope that one day Americans and their elected representatives will realize that the federal government is the creation of the states. A bit of rebellion by officials in other states will speed that process along
 http://www.cnsnews.com/public/Content/article.aspx?Rsrcid=32534

Hope you will all listen and call in!

Radio Free Oklahoma”      Fridays 6-8pm CST

 www.ruleoflawradio.com

 

Bush’s S.O.F.A. agreement with Iraq….not approved by congress

American Freedom Campaign info@americanfreedomcampaign.org

 

The U.S.-Iraq Agreement’s New Clothes

The document parading around as the U.S.-Iraq agreement is not valid under the U.S. Constitution.  Its legitimacy is based solely on the silence of lawmakers (and members of the media), who seem to be paralyzed by the fear of having an independent and intelligent opinion.  Fortunately, one lawmaker has broken the silence and has acknowledged the truth before everyone’s eyes.

It is now time for others, including you, to join their voices with hers.

A few weeks ago, I wrote about the pending U.S.-Iraq agreement, decrying the fact that the Iraqi Parliament was being given the opportunity to vote on whether to approve the agreement while Congress was being denied – and was refusing to fight for – the same opportunity.

Well, thanks to our efforts and the leadership of Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), the U.S. House of Representatives may finally get to voice its opinion on President Bush’s unconstitutional usurpation of Congress’s legislative power. 

Yesterday, Rep. Lee introduced a resolution related to the U.S.-Iraq agreement, inspired in part by AFC’s call for a “signing statement” resolution.  The primary purpose of this resolution is to express the sense of the House that President Bush does not have the power under the Constitution to negotiate and sign such a far-reaching agreement with another nation without seeking congressional approval of the agreement. 

Passage of this resolution — most likely following re-introduction in January — will send a message to the Bush administration, the incoming Obama administration, and the rest of the world that the agreement holds no legal weight under U.S. law and will be considered merely advisory by Congress. 

In truth, even without passage of this resolution, Congress shall not be bound by its terms.  No president can unilaterally commit $10 billion per month in U.S. treasure to keep our troops in another nation.  The United States has never been a monarchy or a dictatorship and we are certainly not going to accept any similar kind of system today.

Putting aside the question over whether this agreement is currently binding or not, it is important that as many lawmakers as possible openly reject the constitutionality of the agreement.  So please tell your U.S. representative to co-sponsor, support, and vote for Rep. Lee’s signing statement resolution (H.Res. 1535) by clicking on the following link:

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2165/t/1027/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26332

Once you have sent your message, please forward this email widely to friends and family.  In the alternative, you can use the “Tell-A-Friend” option on the AFC Web site that will appear after you have sent your message.

Thank you so much for taking action.

Steve Fox
Campaign Director
American Freedom Campaign Action Fund

 

Let me issue and control a nation’s currency………….

http://inpursuitoffreedom.blogspot.com/

 

In Pursuit of Freedom

From A Totalitarian Government

Let me issue and control a nation’s currency and I care not who makes its laws.” Nathan Rothschild

My objective is to expose the truth that America never was the free country we were told, locate the relevant starting point, and present a sequential list of study material, so you can arrive at your own logical conclusions with much less time consuming research and personal study. Not realizing the leviathan of information I would encounter, and having invested in years of research that authenticate my own conclusions, I promise, you will appreciate the time this blog will save you.

(Letters from) Olddog

WeThePeople@mchsi.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

We will be adding this site to our blogroll for easy reference.  Olddog is compiling as much research info as he can on various subjects….all with references and resourrces. 

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me!

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Keith-Olbermann-Broke-Up-W-by-Shannyn-Moore-081120-616.html

 

November 20, 2008

Headlined on 11/20/08:

by Shannyn Moore     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

www.opednews.com

“Like it’s not bad enough. I’ve been hearing loons talk about secession up here my whole life. In Alaska, the three top ballot seats: President, Senate and House of Representatives, have candidates on the ballot from the secessionist Alaska Independent Party. In two of the three, the AIP holds at least 4% of the vote. The felonious Ted Stevens looks like he has convinced over a hundred thousand Alaskans what he couldn’t convince 12 jurors of a few weeks ago.

Now, Keith Olbermann has the temerity to ask if it’s too late to sell Alaska back to the Russians. Repeatedly. America’s liberal boy-wonder is breaking up with me. He’s not the only one suggesting putting Alaska up on eBay, but I can only handle one break up at a time. Consider this partner counseling; the circle of truth; the trust tree.*

I’m like many Alaskans, just not the one you’ve been forced to get to know lately. I know what newspapers I read. I know Africa is NOT a country. I know Stephen Harper is the Prime Minister of Canada, and I know he has T.V. perfect hair. I know who makes up NAFTA – which I thought was a crock when it passed. My favorite birthday present this year was the return of Habeas Corpus in a 5-4 US Supreme Court decision on June 12th.

I’ve never been to New York City, but I wanted to puke in my mouth watching the Republican National Convention’s “9/11 Tribute to Fear.” I wasn’t born in the 60’s, but I know what race baiting is. I know the public executions of JFK, Malcolm X, MLK, and RFK-all in a five year span-drove the American progressive movement into a coma for nearly 40 years. A once empowered, liberal generation sat like Terry Schiavo watching balloons float by; Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush I, Bush II. Wars, the corporate job-exporting economy, the perilous environment, expanded human rights violations, erosion of civil rights, The US Constitution compromised; none of it registered due to blunt force trauma on the American psyche.”

Read the full article here:

 

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Keith-Olbermann-Broke-Up-W-by-Shannyn-Moore-081120-616.html

 

This is such a good article……please take the time to read it.  This authors’ sense of humor is refreshing, yet the article makes some very relevant observations.

A government intent on silencing dissent

At what point we will say “enough!”?  H.R 1955 and the companion S. 1959, both known as the,

 Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007

 

are both nothing more than an outright assault on our civil liberties disguised as anti-terrorism prevention.  These bills are no different than the horrendous Patriot Act or the Security Enhancement Act of 2003.  The words terrorism, terrorist(s) are used only when our constitutional rights are being attacked, and then only as means of justifying the further erosion of our rights and the empowerment and expansion of the government and military over our daily lives.

 

Congress and the president are constitutionally prohibited from abridging our freedoms enumerated in the Constitution.  Why do we tolerate these overt acts of suppression and terrorism by those in our government who have become so fearful of the general population and what could be the reason for this fear?

 

We had the recent opportunity to vote all these bums out of office.  Why were so many of us so willing to re-elect those who have shown us they despise us?

 

 

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h1955/text

 

In the Senate    s. 1595  sponsored by:

 

Sen. Susan Collins [R, ME]

co sponsored by our own Minnesota Windsock….Norm Coleman [R, MN]

 

In the House:  HR 1955 sponsored by:

Rep. Jane Harman [D, CA-36]  and fourteen other anti-American representatives from both sides ……….

and 14 Co-SponsorsRep. Christopher Carney [D, PA-10]

Rep. Donna Christensen [D, VI-0]

Rep. Yvette Clarke [D, NY-11]

Rep. Charles Dent [R, PA-15]

Rep. Norman Dicks [D, WA-6]

Rep. Al Green [D, TX-9]

Rep. James Langevin [D, RI-2]

Rep. Zoe Lofgren [D, CA-16]

Rep. Nita Lowey [D, NY-18]

Rep. Daniel Lungren [R, CA-3]

Rep. Ed Perlmutter [D, CO-7]

Rep. Ted Poe [R, TX-2]

Rep. Dave Reichert [R, WA-8]

Rep. Bennie Thompson [D, MS-2]

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h1955/text

 

In defense of us…things I would like to see happen, but won’t.

 

We have a new president which will hopefully mark a new day for America.  Unfortunately, we are still saddled with Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid whose agendas seem far removed what the majority of American people want.   

 

If I could be the person who could determine the first 100 days of this new presidency, these would be the first things I would make sure were done.

 

• End the use of [and for other purposes] that ends the titling of each and every bill in both houses.  The use of this phrase signals the insertion of pork barrel spending costing taxpayers billions in deficit spending each year.  It also allows the insertion of non-related attachments to the legislation the bill is supposed to be about in order to pass laws that could not pass on their own, usually to our detriment.

 

 

• Demand that each and every bill be read in full by the persons voting on it.  There is no excuse for any elected official to vote on a bill they have not even taken the time to read.  [1]

 

 

• Repeal, rescind, strike down, nullify, wipe out and eradicate every Executive Order that has been issued with the express intent of expanding presidential powers beyond the scope of the Constitution, and used to limit, erase and obliterate civil liberties.

 

• While our country slides further into recession and another 250,000 lost their jobs in October of 2008 bringing our total unemployment numbers to more than 3 million, enforce our immigration laws; penalize those companies that offshore jobs and end the massive trade deficit with China that is in part responsible for the state of our economy.  We need to re-establish our manufacturing base here at home using American workers.  A consumer based economy cannot survive, and was never meant to, especially when the consumers have no discretionary money to spend.

 

• As a direct result of the created financial crisis, suspend all foreign aid except to the poorest countries.  Why we continue to send 8 billion plus, yearly to Israel when their economy is booming and they were somehow not affected by the global crisis, is beyond me. 

 

• Immediately suspend all the tax credits, tax subsidies and cash subsidies to oil companies.  The idea that these companies netted as much as 30 billion in 2007 and will see at least that much for this year while America struggles to stay afloat, is beyond me. 

 

• Remove Social Security funds from the general fund.  Secure these funds against raiding by the federal government.  Currently, there is 2.6 trillion in worthless I.O.U.’s  sitting in Social Security as a result of theft by the federal government.  Since this debt, created by stealing the retirement investments of American workers cannot be paid back (and in fact, there was never any intention to pay it back) the federal government now lists this debt by theft as an [unfunded liability];  which should explain the continual scrambling to try and “fix” the system before we find out just how much damage they have done.

 

• Remove us from the United Nations and tell them to build their multi-billion dollar new complex somewhere else…..and to provide the bulk of the financing they are expecting us to provide.

 

• Cut the bloated White House Staff that is costing taxpayers more than 32 million a year. [2]

 

• Cut the bloated congressional staffs.

 

• End the lobbyist faction.  Special interest groups and persons should be required to conduct all their efforts in front of the CSPAN camera’s.  That alone could end this nightmare that money creates for all of us, in the halls of congress.

 

• Suspend all retirement payments to former members of congress and their spouses.  The millions spent each year for this largesse is more than we can afford, especially for people who most likely don’t need the money.  If those of us out here in no-man’s land have to tighten our belts and sacrifice, these people should be more than happy to contribute their fair share.

 

• Begin the ending of the wars.

Seems like a lot doesn’t it?  The truth is, all of these things could be accomplished in a matter of days.  The fact is, nothing remotely similar to this will happen.  Congress will continue to operate as an entity with no obligation to the population.   

 

What we can do is to remain vigilant, remain involved and continue to speak our minds where ever and when ever possible.  Our reticence and our apathy is what got us into the situation we find our selves in now.  This is not the time to revert back to old habits and feeling that with this new president, everything is fine……it isn’t.  Whatever your political leanings, now is the time to stand up and speak out. 

 

© 2008 Marti Oakley

 

[2] A look at the real numbers… by Dan Martin

https://ppjg.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/a-look-at-the-real-numbers/

 

[1] Read the Bills Act ….downsizedc.org

http://www.downsizedc.org/page/read_the_laws

 

Veterans must fight, or die homeless, hungry and in pain.

Andrew C. Wallace

http://www.newswithviews.com/Wallace/andrew116.htm  

Man your canes, walkers and wheel chairs. We defeated the communists and fascists once, now we must do it again by voting them out of our own government. These socialist ghouls infiltrated everything, and are usurping our government while stealing the assets that we earned to finance benefits for our final days. While physical activity now may be painful, contemplate your agony with no benefits, if you don’t do something on November fourth to prevent a communist takeover.

 

Demand that your family and friends go to the polls with you and defeat the traitors who voted for the Bailouts, Amnesty and Free Trade. You can overcome resistance from your socialist indoctrinated children or grandchildren by telling them you will lose all your benefits and have to move in with them if the criminals are not defeated.

 

We must honor the solemn oath we took long ago, and answer this final call to defend our country by defeating the traitors at the ballot box. We cannot die, and surrender our country to a ruthless Communist-Fascist government. A criminal cabal of government and corporate officials of both parties has usurped our government, passing countless unconstitutional laws allowing them to enrich themselves and to destroy us. Phony Free Trade Laws, exploited illegals, and ten different worker Visa programs took our jobs. Using the private Federal Reserve Bank, owned by private banks gave them ability to cause the Great Depression, and now this Greatest of all Depressions when they reduce us to poverty and slavery. with the bailouts.

 

The American People objected to the unconstitutional bailouts by a ratio of about 95 to 1, as did hundreds of independent Economists, but legislators ignored the people and gave the money to their corporate benefactors who caused the Meltdown with their criminal greed. These traitors must be defeated.

 

We allowed this to happen by permitting our schools, institutions and government to be taken over and run by greedy power mad Socialists (communists and fascists) who were too good to work, and too cowardly to serve their country as we did, they chose instead to undermine it. Our Constitution describes the actions of Leaders of both political parties, a majority of congress and many government officials as Treason, pure and simple.

 

Those of us who now fight for our country are in an untenable position because most people resent those who deliver bad news, even if true, and the traitors would like to do us harm for telling the documented truth. You are as uninformed as a box of rocks because the mainstream media is controlled, and refuses to report anything that would reduce the greedy profits of their fascist owners and the power of communist traitors in government.

 

As an Economist, I can tell you that if we can defeat the criminal socialists in government, terminate the unconstitutional private Federal Reserve bank, institute a constitutional currency, end Free Trade deals and other treaties that limit our sovereignty that there is a chance for our Republic. It will require a long difficult and painful period of rebuilding, but if we fail to defeat the communists on November fourth, our people’s pain will be so great that a bloody civil war will result in the near future.

 

I am already a more or less infamous writer, so it will cause me little additional harm to tell you to obtain some gold and silver coins, guns, and ammunition, long term food supplies and related items. Gold Currency now costs three times as much as it did in 2000 and is very difficult to buy. Our media does not report it, but we have active war zones all over this country because of illegals and ongoing treason by government officials in all levels and branches of government. I can’t tell you when all paper money will be worthless, just that it absolutely must occur. This can happen in a day, or in several years, but I think sooner rather than later. You cannot issue endless quantities of money with no backing and expect your currency to retain any value. Those of you with stock have noticed that you have been, and will continue to be sacrificed by communists in government to protect their fascist elite benefactors who control the corporations.

 

Your physical freedom is at risk; look at those who have been framed. Government ignores the Constitution that is the basis for their authority to govern. The result is unconstitutional laws, loss of the Rule of Law, and your God given, and Constitutional Rights. Our government is being usurped by Communists in partnership with Fascists because the controlled media keeps the people ignorant.

 

Bob Schultz, a noted attorney and patriot has a long history of trying to protect our rights in the courts. http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org. Some of his important quotes are:

1. United States v We The People is yet another example of the power of the merchants of debt and the corruption of the Judiciary
2. My argument is the People never gave that power to the Government and the Government has taken another step outside the boundaries We the People have drawn around its limited, enumerated powers. 
3. The Constitution is all that stands between the People and total tyranny and despotism. However, the Constitution can’t defend itself. That responsibility rests with the People
4. A free People should always ask, after each impasse, “What is the appropriate next step, given the Government’s violation of the Constitution, and its refusal to respond to legitimate Petitions for Redress?”
5. The time has come to more openly question and explain why I, or anyone else, should continue to engage our corrupt judiciary in a seemingly losing effort to hold the Government accountable to the restrictions, prohibitions and limited powers set forth in our Constitution
6. We the People do not draw near our servant Government as aggressors. Our war is not a war of conquest or overthrow. We fight solely in the defense of our Constitution, our Liberty, our Freedom, our unalienable Rights, and our homes, families, and posterity. The record is clear and unambiguous. We the People have repeatedly Petitioned, humbly and in good faith. Our Petitions have been met with scorn. We have entreated, and our entreaties have been disregarded. We have begged, and they have mocked, even now as our financial calamity falls upon us – a bastard born of excessive government force and constitutional abuse
7. If we have evidence of violations of the Constitution, we have the unalienable Right of Redress – to Petition the Government for Redress of these violations.  If the Government refuses to respond we have the inherent Right to withdraw our allegiance and support

 

 In light of the preceding statements that our government officials are not functioning under full authority of the constitution; you should advise your family and friends who are in the Armed Forces or the Police to refuse to deprive citizens of their God given and Constitutional Rights; because in so doing they are violating the Constitution; and may be supporting a coup causing a bloody Civil War; that an unconstitutional government cannot win with odds of more than 300 to 1.

 

The presidential campaign with Obama and McCain is a total fraud, both are controlled by the same people who are out to impoverish and enslave us. Both of them announced they support amnesty, free trade and the bailouts which gives everything we have to the corporate elites. I like Obama the least because I am a Christian redneck who clings to his religion and guns and cannot support abortion. But, whoever is elected should be impeached.

 

Please take this link to my last article that has a list of the criminals in congress who voted for the bailout and must be defeated.. http://www.newswithviews.com/Wallace/andrew115.htm

Watch “The End of America” film online — FREE

American Freedom Campaign

 info@americanfreedomcampaign.org

With one of the most important elections in our history just around the corner, we at the American Freedom Campaign hope you will take the opportunity to watch a powerful documentary about the current state of our democracy.  It is based on Naomi Wolf’s best-selling book, The End of America, and it describes the steps the Bush administration has taken since 2001 to undermine our liberties and our rights as Americans.  It also conveys what this may mean to the future of this nation if we do not reverse course quickly. 

The good news is that you have the opportunity to see this documentary for FREE online.  Moreover, if you are inspired to bring this message of warning to your friends, family and members of your community, you can purchase the DVD for immediate delivery so that you can host a screening prior to the election. 

So here, in more detail, is how you can watch the documentary and spread its message to other Americans:

1. Tune In

Watch a four-minute preview of The End of America.  If you only have a few minutes right now, click here for a sneak preview.
(If the hyperlink doesn’t work, use this url: http://myamericaproject.org/)

 

 

Watch the entire film for FREE.  Through a unique distribution method, you can see the full 75-minute version of The End of America streamed online for free at Snag Films.  Sure, there are a few ads interspersed within, but that’s what allows them to show it to you for free.
(If the hyperlink doesn’t work, use this url: http://www.snagfilms.com/films/title/the_end_of_america/ )

 

2. Talk About It

Forward this email to at least five friends, family members or colleagues (and ask them to forward it to five people they know). Embed a link to the film in your Facebook page, emails or Web site. Blog about it.  You can grab a graphic to link to the film by using this url: http://www.endofamericamovie.com/guerilla.php

3. Take It to the Streets

Host a public screening of the film.  We hope that you will be moved by the film and inspired to bring its powerful message to your community at your home, school, place of worship or any other venue.  To do so, you can purchase the DVD through a special AFC page set up by the distributor of the film, who has committed to making sure you receive your copy of the DVD prior to the election.  (In fact, you should receive it within three business days.)  If you simply cannot wait for this to be delivered by mail to your home, you can pay a slight premium and download a copy of the DVD and burn it to a disc.
(If the hyperlink to purchase the DVD doesn’t work, use this url: https://www.indiepixfilms.com/cart/add_to_cart/3575. To download a copy of the DVD, use this url: https://www.indiepixfilms.com/cart/add_to_cart/3587?REF=AFC)

More about The End of America, the documentary

Based on Naomi Wolf’s best-selling book, The End of America identifies how open societies close down as they slide toward fascism and how this is happening in the U.S. right now. The documentary follows Wolf as she takes her book to the streets, urging Americans to defend the Constitution and restore our nation’s cherished democratic values.

My sense of alarm comes from the clear lessons from history that, once certain checks and balances are destroyed, and once certain institutions have been intimidated, the pressures that can turn an open society into a closed one turn into direct assaults; at that point events tend to occur very rapidly, and a point comes at which there is no easy turning back to the way it used to be.

— Naomi Wolf, The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot 

I hope that you take advantage of this opportunity to see this important film and to share it with your friends, family, and colleagues before November 4.

 

Best,
Steve

Steve Fox
Campaign Director
American Freedom Campaign

The Economics of Disaster: from Constitution Forum

  http://www.constitutionforum.us/

The government of the United States of America is not what it is today because it evolved from the government bequeathed to us by our Founding Fathers. To be sure, instead of being a logical result of their efforts, instead, it is a realization of their worst fears. This deplorable state of affairs came about when our Republic was overthrown from within in 1913 as a result of the creation of the Federal Reserve; a private corporation given authority and control over our economy. This state of affairs allowed the conspirators who control the Federal Reserve to grow wealthy beyond anyone’s comprehension and they used this wealth to corrupt our government and the institutions of our society. The following two articles, “The Economics of Disaster – Parts I & II”, looks into these issues and expands upon the consequences associated with a fractional reserve banking system. Reading these articles will change your perceptions about how our government functions and allow you to discern what is behind the deplorable path our government is on today.

Click here to go to: The Economics of Disaster – Part I

Click here to go to: The Economics of Disaster – Part II

The United States is still a British Colony (and you pay them taxes!)

Note:

The civil constitution was simply a set of protections for the occupants of what was to become the collective United States, from the King of England. It has not been in effect since 1871.

 

In 1871 under the 41^st congress, a new incorporation of the federal government, to reside in the territory of what is now known as “District of Columbia” was illegally implemented.

 

Since that date, every person in the states has been indexed as a “trust” of that corporation. (See two previous articles linked below)

 

The United States is still a British Colony

Excerpted from the page located at: http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/united_states_british_colony.htm

“As further evidence, not that any is needed, a percentage of taxes that are paid are to enrich the king/queen of England. For those that study Title 26 you will recognize IMF, which means Individual Master File, all tax payers have one. To read one you have to be able to break their codes using file 6209, which is about 467 pages. On your IMF you will find a blocking series, which tells you what type of tax you are paying. You will probably find a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 says is reserved. You then look up the BMF 300-399, which is the Business Master File in 6209. You would have seen prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, non-refile DLN. Meaning everyone is considered a business and involved in commerce and you are being held liable for a tax via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K.. The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA – Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account, you won’t find many people using this form, just the 1040 form. The 8288 form can be found in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. If you will check the OMB’s paper – Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information Collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act, you will find this form under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. withholding tax-return for dispositions by foreign persons of U.S. real property interests-statement of withholding on dispositions, by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288 #8288a.

These codes have since been changed to read as follows; IMF 300-309, Barred Assessment,

CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is

the code for 1040 form.

IMF 310-399 reserved, the BMF 300-309 reads the same as IMF 300-309.

BMF 390-399 reads U.S./U.K. Tax Treaty Claims.

The long and short of it is nothing changed, the government just made it plainer,

the 1040 is the payment of a foreign tax to the

king/queen of England.

We have been in financial servitude since the Treaty of 1783.” (emphasis mine)

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/united_states_british_colony.htm

 

 

 

The Occupation of the United States; Or How Lincoln Made slaves out of All of Us.

https://ppjg.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/the-occupation-of-the-united-states-orhow-lincoln-made-slaves-out-of-all-of-us/#comment-266

 

The Law of Contracts: Government Agencies Existing as Corporations

https://ppjg.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/the-law-of-contracts-government-agencies-existing-as-corporations/

 

 

 

 

 

How the Senate worked its “magic”

It looks like the U.S. Senate did it the old-fashioned way:

 

“Besides the tax breaks, senators also made a change that had drawn widespread support in recent days – a temporary increase in the amount of bank deposits covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, to $250,000 from $100,000.  And the entire package was attached to legislation requiring insurers to treat mental health conditions more like general health problems, a long-sought goal of many lawmakers who demanded such parity.”  (Italics added for emphasis.)

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/02/business/02bailout.html?

 

I’ve puzzled over what the impetus is behind all of the scaremongering and running amok that has been going on in our Capitol.

 

The reason might be simply this:

 

“There are powerful foreign interests threatening to pull their money out of the market if we don’t pay them back for the bad mortgage securities they were fool enough to buy into.”

 

metalpipe See Profile I’m a Fan of metalpipe I’m a fan of this user permalink

 

Perhaps, if the President and/or Congress had shared this with us, we could have gotten down to the business of reassuring foreign markets and shitcanning the people who drove our economy into this sad state of affairs.

Remembering the U.S. Constitution

Is Anyone Paying Attention To

The Constitution of the United States

 

Section 7. – Passage of Bills

Clause 1.  All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other Bills.[13]

 

Footnote 13.  In practice, “appropriation bills,” or bills granting money for government services and actions, also originate in the House.  The practice originates from the United Kingdom, where the House of Commons originates all revenue or appropriation bills, and the House of Lords does not, by tradition, even amend them.

 

 http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/The_Annotated_Constitution_of_the_United_States#Section_7.

 

Will someone please explain to me what happened yesterday (October 1, 2008) in the U.S. Senate?

 

By what devious parliamentary maneuvering was the Senate able to grab the ball, thrown completely off the court by the House of Representatives, and run with it?

 

How can the Senate propose or concur amendments to a bill that has gone down to defeat, pass the amended bill by a margin of 74%, and send it back to the house for “final” consideration?

 

Or, has the United States Senate joined ranks with the White House in openly ignoring the constitution, acting as though not just the law but also the constitution itself, which is the fundamental law from which all the statutes gain their force and legitimacy, doesn’t apply to them?

 

In any case, this does not bode well for the continued “rule of law” in our fair land.

File suit if bailout is passed!!!

(Following is what you should send to your government officials. If you want copy of related legal documents contact D.S.Buess

Dear Congressperson_______________.

This is to advise that a charge of misuse of public funds shall be filed against any and all who use public funds to aid private corporations, it is in violation of the Constitution of these United States of America, unincorporated, the Peoples’ Constitutionally established Government.

The People, your bosses, will no longer stand by and allow the misuse of public funds, you are hereby ordered to Cease and Desist any and all activities relating to any financial aid to private corporations.

Should you continue then I will file a criminal complaint with the Governor’s office, the States Attorney General, local Sheriff and my State Legislators and demand you be recalled and face criminal charges dealing with MISUSE OF PUBLIC FUNDS.

 D_S_Buess [mailto:d_s_buess@peoplepc.com]

The Law of Contracts: Government Agencies Existing as Corporations

The Law of Contracts: Government Agencies Existing as Corporations

 

While researching the incorporation of the federal government in 1871 I discovered that not only had the government been made over into a ruling corporation, but through extension so had multiple government agencies.  This came about over the years since the original coup of 1871 and has been incrementally extended to almost all government agencies and departments.

 

What does this mean to you?

 

It means that agencies such as, the Department of Agriculture for example, is a fully accredited corporation operating independent of the federal government with few exceptions.  Although the creation of this corporation came with certain caveats that allowed the fed to minimally instruct or legislate its activity, the DoA is no different than any other privately held corporation and subject to nothing except the law of contracts, administered by administrative “judges” who pin their decisions not on the common law of the United States, but rather, on the system of codes and statutes known as the Uniform Commercial Code.  The UCC is simply the US version of British Maritime Law.

 

This means that when dealing with this corporation (or any of the other hundreds of sub-corporations owned by THE UNITED STATES), especially in litigation, any correspondence from them will have your name fully capitalized as notice to you that you are a corporate trust with no human implication, and therefore not subject to common law.  Your interaction with this agency will be subject to the Uniform Commercial Code, and you have no right to use the constitution to defend yourself. 

 

So who owns the Department of Agriculture and other government agencies/corporations?

 

The DoA like many other corporately held agencies is owned by the parent corporation:

THE UNITED STATES (a corporation) a.k.a. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.  Because it is incorporated, THE UNITED STATES is governed by the law of contracts and not the constitution of the United States (the common law applied to citizens of the collective and formerly sovereign states before 1871)

 

This simple piece of knowledge explains why “agreements” (not treaties) are entered into which put the rights of the corporation above those of human beings. CAFTA is an ideal example here.  CAFTA explicitly puts the rights of the corporate interests above those of humanity, and profits, above any human right.  Any law currently on the books or under consideration for passage can be struck down immediately using the “trade illegal” provisions of CAFTA.  Any law which in the eyes of the corporate interest precludes them from making all the profits they believe they are entitled to, is deemed “trade illegal” and can be legally challenged, again using the UCC.

 

As a corporation, THE UNITED STATES has no obligation to abide by the constitutional provisions and requirements necessary to pass a treaty under the constitution or subject to common laws provided in it.  These provisions, if adhered to, make treaties the supreme law of the land.  This means that each and every state, after having thoroughly vetted and voted on the passage of the treaty is required to abide by its requirements.  No exceptions.  A corporate agreement is not subject to any of these provisions as it is ruled by administrative code and statute and not by common law. 

 

Because the trade agreements are not legal treaties, compliance cannot be forced upon the states….but none of your representatives or senators will tell you that.

 

“Agreements” are simply corporate agreements between the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES, and other corporate entities from other nations, all of them operating as governmental authorities.  

 

In the last few years, court decisions rendered in courtrooms in which administrative law is being administered, (meaning statutes and codes, and not the common law) decisions such as the one by “Judge” Barbadoro in New Hampshire.  In April of 2007 he handed down a decision that said,  “corporations, as legal persons, have “free speech rights” that would be infringed”. 

 

From http://www.reclaimdemocracy.org   ……..

 

 “But corporate lawyers (acting as both attorneys and judges) subverted our Bill of Rights in the late 1800’s by establishing the doctrine of “corporate personhood” — the claim that corporations were intended to fully enjoy the legal status and protections created for human beings.” (1) (end excerpt)

 

In the case of Guantanamo detainees, one judge declared that while some corporations have human rights, some humans do not. 

 

It is important to understand the creation of corporate personhood in the context of our government and its corporate agencies.  The judge in the above case referring to detainee’s was obviously referring to the corporate personhood of THE UNITED STATES as superior to the human rights of the detainee.  This kind of judicial and preferential treatment with regards to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES is helping to establish the precedence which will be used in subsequent legal battles where the rights of the individual are cast aside in favor of the corporation.

 

These are some of the government agencies which have been recreated as corporations:

• Conrail                                                                              AMTRAK
• Corporation for Public Broadcasting                               Commodity Credit Corp.
• Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation                           Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
• Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board                   Legal Services Corporation      
• United States government sponsored enterprise              Overseas Private Investment Corporation
• Overseas Private Investment Corporation                        Export-Import Bank of the United States

·   Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation                     Reconstruction Finance Corp.     

Add to this list the FDA, USDA, HHS, HSD, DoA, DoD, and every other government agency. Each and every one of them including the corporate federal government (THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) is listed on Dunn & Bradstreet and is issued a DUNS credit report.  Each and every one is a for-profit corporation.                     

 

Also included in the corporate recreation of our government is the takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage.(2)

Before we can ever hope to clean up the corruption of our government, we first have to eliminate the incorporation of the government that took place in 1871.  Everything that has transpired since that year is a direct result of the corporate coup that overthrew the legitimate legal government of the United States. 

Once you understand that what you are fighting is not the government, but rather a, corporation acting as government, things begin to fall into place.   Understanding  that what you are dealing with is a collection of governmental corporations, the aberrations in our legal system, the trashing of our constitution and the loss of our civil rights all begins to make sense. 

©2008 Marti Oakley

(1)

http://reclaimdemocracy.org/personhood/guantanamo_human_persons.php

 

(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Governmentowned_companies_in_the_United_States

DECLARATION OF THE PEOPLE’S SOVEREIGNTY

 Andrew Wallace, writing for News With Views, gives an excellant dissertation on the treason that abounds in our government and our obligation to rectify that treason.   News With Views carries an extensive archive of Mr. Wallace’s writings that are always to the point and on the mark. 

 

By Andrew C. Wallace
August 13, 2008
NewsWithViews.com

http://www.newswithviews.com/Wallace/andrew12.htm

(Excerpted from the article by Andrew Wallace)

“Anyone who actively supports either Democrat or Republican parties should go to the backyard and practice braying like an uninformed jackass because they are one. We must only vote for individuals, regardless of party, who we have determined by personal encounters to be Patriots who will represent us, and not the Chain of Command for Treason..

Our Constitution requires government to defend the people from invasion and other threats. The ongoing refusal by government officials to either protect the people as guaranteed by the Constitution or to support and encourage the people to protect themselves is a most serious and unambiguous act of treason. Our only viable solution, short of civil war, is to remove and prosecute government officials for treason using the rule of law. It is common knowledge that many Americans believe that a majority of government officials have betrayed this country and refuse to protect citizens, but actively use their power in support of illegal invaders and other criminals, thus giving citizens the right under the Constitution and Declaration of Independence to take autonomous action.” (end excerpt)

Read the full article here:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Wallace/andrew12.htm

The Supreme Court & the NRA’s Response

According to an article posted by Ohioans for Concealed Carry (June 28, 2008), written by Daniel White (NRA Files Second Amendment Lawsuits In Illinois And California Following Supreme Court Ruling), The National Rifle Association (NRA) has filed lawsuits against San Francisco and Chicago to overturn their gun ban laws in the wake of the Supreme Court’s “decision,” last week, about the Second Amendment.

The San Francisco suit is brought under a ficticious pseudonym in order to protect the identity of the plaintiff, a gay man living in public housing.

On the surface, these actions seem to be a righteous response to the so-called “victory” for the Second Amendment – which is not a victory at all (see my article, What the Second Amendment Really Means – And What the Supreme Court Really Means). Of course, this is by design, to project the continued camouflage the NRA needs in order to conceal the fact it has been working for gun control, not against it, for years. This is revealed in the language of the court document itself, which states:

“This is an action under Title 42 U.S.C. 1983 to vindicate the rights of law abiding, responsible San Francisco residents and residents of public housing to keep firearms as guaranteed by Second and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which guarantee the right of law-abiding, responsible adults to keep firearms in the home for lawful defense of their families and other lawful purposes.” (emphasis mine)

There are a few things wrong with this wording that you need to be alerted to, and which will make clear the NRA’s subterfuge. First is the term “law-abiding” or “law-abiding adults.” If the Constitution – not the several unconstitutional gun-control laws on the books – is the law of the land (as it is supposed to be), then the only law governing gun ownership that anyone need “abide” by is the Second Amendment of the Constitution itself, which clearly states that “…the right of the people [not some specified sub-set of the people, but all of the people] to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

What does this mean? It means that the Constitution makes no distinctions about who has the right to keep and bear arms, nor does it make any distinctions about what type of weaponry the term “arms” is supposed to denote, nor does it make any distinctions as to under what circumstances or in what locations a person may keep or bear arms. It is clear the founders intended that the absolute right of everyone to keep whatever weapons they wanted to and to be able to freely carry them as they see fit – anywhere, any time – is an existing right that the government may not regulate, curtail or remove in any way. Why? Because this right is fundamental to protecting us from a tyrannical government and, of course, if that very same government has the power to confiscate our means of protecting our lives and liberty, then our free republic as we know it is finished.

So, it is evident, then, that the NRA’s supposedly indignant defense of the right to keep and bear arms is not any such thing at all. It is, in fact, a smoke screen, a diversion to make us believe that the NRA is standing up for our rights, when, in fact, it is playing right into the government’s hands (and quite deliberately, as it has been infiltrated and subverted by those who seek to eliminate gun ownership) by acknowledging the very same “reasonable limitations” the Supreme Court spoke of last week when it rendered its decision (which was, in itself, an unconstitutional act, as it violates the court’s constitutional limitations of power).

The fact is, everyone has an unalienable right to possess whatever weapons they deem necessary to defend themselves with and there are to be no restrictions of this of any kind. That is the spirit and letter of the Second Amendment. To allow anything short of this is a direct violation of the Constitution.

 

It’s time to sue Congress

Headlined on 6/16/08:
It’s time to sue Congress

by Kathryn Smith     

http://www.opednews.com

If they won’t impeach a man who has violated more than 900 laws, failed Katrina victims and actively intercepted the delivery of aid to their area (treason), ignored pre-911 intelligence, kidnapped and tortured detainees and children as young as ten years old, endangered Valerie Plame’s life with the leak of her name, etc….then it’s time for us to sue Congress.

With the planned strike on Iran, even more lives hang in the balance for the sake of a lie.

.It’s time for us to file wrongful death lawsuits!

 
.It’s time for us to file lawsuits for undue emotional distress!

 
.It’s time for us to tell Congress, in no uncertain terms, that we will replace every single one of those who refuses to uphold, protect and defend the Constitution…for whatever “reason” they may assert.

Let’s take our power back! Let’s give it to them where it counts…in the pocketbook!

Let’s get chain emails going to expose the corrupt voting record of individual Congress members. Let’s post those facts to the Internet, in record numbers! Let’s write College newsletter editors and underground media, to make sure word gets out, to expose Congress’s voting records (and how corrupt they are!) Let’s dial in to radio talk shows…

Dynamo, let’s go! We DO have power to get these people out of office. Then we will feel Encouraged again, not Discouraged…after the traitors have been ousted.

PASS THE CONGRESSIONAL VOTING RECORD AROUND!

Publicize this question:
“Congress, must the system of checks and balances come from overseas?”

Now let me make this very clear. I am not asking anyone to quote me as having coined that question. PLEASE! I need no recognition and neither do I even want any. THis is about the cause itself! PLease spread word!

Thank you.

Take action — click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Please expose voting record of YOUR congressperson

 

Oklahoma Declares Sovereignty

STATE OF OKLAHOMA
2nd Session of the 51st Legislature (2008)
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 1089

By: Key
AS INTRODUCED

A Joint Resolution claiming sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over certain powers; serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates; and directing distribution.

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”; and

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and

WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and

WHEREAS, today, in 2008, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and 

WHEREAS, many federal mandates are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and

 
WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and 

WHEREAS, a number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE OF THE 2ND SESSION OF THE 51ST OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE:

THAT the State of Oklahoma hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.

THAT this serves as Notice and Demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers.

THAT a copy of this resolution be distributed to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate of each state’s legislature of the United States of America, and each member of the Oklahoma Congressional Delegation.

http://www.okhouse.gov/51LEG/Leg_Votesxx.aspx?include=okh01983.txt

http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/2007-08HB/HJR1089_int.rtf

The GOP Eats Its Young….AGAIN

I just received a copy of “The Minnesota Concervative Delegate Team” sent to all those “true Republicans”.  (All three of them?) 

It’s as if the propaganda emails highlighting Obama’s middle name (Hussein) weren’t stupid enough; as if the emails citing tax tables in a Clinton vs. Bush administration ploy…..that carefully omitted the alternative tax Bush loves so much that will eat up 55% of household incomes by 2010, but only for working class Americans. (By the way…..Clinton has been gone for 7 years now..get over it)

As if the conservative vs. liberal letters that supposedly compare the “values” and “morality” of true conservatives versus those godless liberals, didn’t ignore the hypocrisy of the right, didn’t leave one with the sense that someone had either not listened to the news or suffered from severe selective hearing, I just don’t think there is any hope for the Republican party at all.

I believe if we are going to fear someone because of what their parents named them, we should be in total fear of anyone named George…or Dick just for starters.  Heck! I think we should ban everyone with the last name of Bush, from the country. 

This latest letter from the Minnesota Conservative Delegate Team is another of those cases of the GOP eating its young or maybe swallowing its own tale.  Apparently ired by the refusal of Ron Paul supporters to go away like good GOP’ers, the MCDT has taken it upon itself to stifle support within the party for a candidate that is getting support from all quarters.  Now, you would think that Ron Paul’s adherence to the Constitution, to principle, to the laws and his opposition to NAFTA, CAFTA and other illegal trade agreements would have made him a star in the Republican party.  Its apparent that the core of the party has become so corrupted they can no longer identify a true conservative, patriotic, and honest candidate even when he is in their own ranks.  Makes me wonder when the self identified “leaders” of the Republican party will come out and admit that they are neo-conservatives (meaning not conservatives at all) and that the corruption is so ingrained, such a political aphrodisiac they are beside themselves wondering why the sheeple in the party refuse to follow their lead.

(quote) “Whatever success Paul supporters have had in Minnesota Conventions has largely been the result of the failure of mainstream conservative Republicans to unite behind a qualified team of party leaders”.  (So anyone who doesn’t do what you tell them to do is not maintstream?)                                                     

And in closing this letter against opposing such an unpopular candidate as McCain:  “The civil war that is ripping the Democratic party apart does not need to occur within our party; we have our nominee.  John McCain” (end quote)

Just for the record, that “civil war” referred to in the Democratic party is called campaigning for office.  Its the battle that should take place if you really do believe in democracy and fair and open elections.  Its apparent that Republicans do not.  We have only to look at the election fraud of the 2000 and 2004. Elections that saw caging, hacked voting machines, corrupt secretaries of states, purged votes, shredded votes, disenfranchized voters, and the interference in a national election by a corrupt, Republican dominated Supreme Court.  Ah! To be a Republican! 

Everytime I receive another of these letters, another of these carefully crafted efforts to tell conservatives who they are going to vote for, rather than finding out whom they wish to vote for, I would laugh except it isn’t really funny.

I want to know who decided that we were so stupid, so gullible that sending out flame emails that contain absolutely stupid information or that requires us to lower our level of intelligence in order to accept what the GOP wants rather than making our own choices…..who are these people?  And why do we pay any attention to them at all? 

The Republican party may suffer a split (I believe it already has) but not because Ron Paul supporters won’t go away.  The split will occur because it is so apparent that the party of manipulation and control, the party that proclaimed its own virtuosity, its own high morals, its own self righteous piety, has been exposed.  And what has been laid bare for all to see is that rather than the party of morality, patriotism and freedom, and all the other adjectives right wingers like to use to discibe themselves while they preen, is nothing more than a private club of self promoting individuals who believe they can and should call the shots. 

What is glaringly apparent is that selecting the best candidate for the preservation of the country is not the issue; simply having a Republican candidate they selected before hand whom they are assured will continue the wars and the destruction of our soveriegn nation is more important than any silly old thing like the constitution and the law. 

Personally, I wish the neo-con faction would just split away and form its own party (it is one anyway) and leave the rest of us alone.  And please!  No more idiotic emails with bogus messages in them.  Forwarding these electronic pieces of crap make us all look as if we have little character and even less integrity.  What scares me is the people who forward them and actually think they are worth anything other than a quick delete.

I will not be voting for McCain…..the worst possible choice, followed closely by both Democrats.  Just for the record I will be voting for Ron Paul even if I have to write his name in on the ballot.  I don’t believe party leaders are any more qualified to determine who I vote for than I am.  Either way…..I decide who gets my vote…….not the GOP.

Marti Oakley (c) 2008

LONG LIVE OUR U.S. CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS!

President Bush Participates in Joint Press Availability with President Calderon of Mexico and Prime Minister Harper of Canada
Gallier Hall
New Orleans, Louisiana

 

“We talked about trade. Mexico, Canada and the United States made a bold decision in the early 1990s. Our countries decided to reduce our trade barriers through the North American Free Trade Agreement. That was a visionary move by previous leaders, a move that has benefitted all three of our countries — a lot. [Not the USA!] Trade has tripled. [ IN WHICH Direction!?]

 Our economies have grown by more than 50 percent. “ (WHERE?? NOT in the U.S.A.!)

 

“Now is not the time to renegotiate NAFTA or walk away from NAFTA. Now is the time to make it work better for all our people, and now is the time to reduce trade barriers worldwide.”

 

– President’e Bush

 

Source:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/04/20080422-5.html

 

---

Joint Statement by President Bush, President Calderon, Prime Minister Harper  April 22, 2008

“The SPP complements the success of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which has helped to triple trade since 1993 among our three countries to a projected $1 trillion in 2008. [Our trade DEFICIT proves that,eh?] 

NAFTA has offered our consumers a greater variety of better and less expensive goods and services, [Where?] 

encouraged our businesses to increase investment throughout North America, [NOT in the USA!] 

and helped to create millions of new jobs [WITH the exception of the USA!] in  all three countries.

NAFTA is key to maintaining North America‘s [GLOBALISTS] competitive edge in an increasingly complex, fast-paced and connected global marketplace.

Source for above: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/04/20080422-4.html

---

TURNCOAT WORDS AND LIES FROM A TRAITOROUS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES! READ HIS OWN DAMN LIES FOR YOURSELF VIA THE LINKS BELOW!!!

---

NORTH AMERICAN LEADER’S SUMMIT WEBSITE

http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/naleaders/

April 22, 2008

President Bush Meets with Community Leaders in New Orleans

President Bush Participates in Joint Press Availability with President Calderon of Mexico and Prime Minister Harper of Canada

Joint Statement by President Bush, President Calderon, Prime Minister Harper

 

April 21, 2008
President Bush Attends United States Chamber of Commerce Reception

President Bush Meets with Prime Minister Harper of Canada

President Bush Meets with President Calderon of Mexico

President Bush Attends Opening of Mexican Consulate

 

---

This information provided by:

Les Lemke  

 

  

Neo-Con Calls For Shredding Constitution, Imposing World Government

A recent Austin-American Statesman review of Neo-Con Philip Bobbitt’s new book Terror and Consent features an image of a shredded Constitution under the words “Everything must go,” which acts as a suitable entrée to a disgusting diatribe which praises Bobbitt’s call for the end of America and its replacement with a de facto world government in the name of fighting terror. The words, “How to Fight Terrorism” are in place of a torn piece of the Bill of Rights. Read more…