Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved
Originally published in August 2009
Greetings:
Consider this a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to all members of the Senate, all members of the House, and to President Obama. I am sure you are fully aware of the intent and implications of MOUs, as each of you, in one way or another, uses them to establish the outlining of agreements between yourselves, collectively or individually, concerning the agreements you have made with individuals acting as state’s representatives or agencies; generally to avoid Constitutional prohibitions on your intended actions and in avoidance of the Constitution. I am using it in quite another fashion as you will see in the following text. More
“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
_______________________________________________
Washington D.C., known more these days as the “district of criminals” commits so many crimes each day as a collective body that a moratorium on government should be declared until we can clean this nest of globalists, these kissers of corporate butts who seem more determined to protect their own private interests than protecting our country from obliteration by global cabals.
As congress moves forward with plans to end our sovereignty, as they collude with foreign interests to take our jobs, to destroy our culture and to subject us to international laws and agreements harmful to us as a nation, we need to remember who we are. We are not globalists; we are Americans. We are not “citizens” of some new world… We are not a collection of mindlessly identified numbers and codes, biometric identifiers, or mindless sheep that don’t understand what is being done to our nation. We are the greatest society to have ever existed. WE ARE AMERICANS. More
Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved
________________________________________________
Comment: It appears we are caught in the middle of a nightmare from which we are unable to wake. While the president insists we must accept the global economy, we can see the devastating effects of this system of global banking, mounting famine and starvation, the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few and the massive decline in wages and the standard of living here in the US. If this is what a global economy does, and if unlawful trade agreements are constructed to facilitate this, I say we reject it totally; it is killing us all. More
This week’s Jackass Award goes to Senator Tom Harkin. While the country founders in debt, Senator Harkin maintains that he has the constitutional right to create debt through the use of earmarks! Makes him look really good at home come election time!
__________________________________________________________Yesterday I sat through about 45 minutes of arguments on the Senate floor via C-SPAN, regarding the use of earmarks which by the Senates’ own admission, costs the country an average of 350 BILLION dollars per year. This is money spent by elected officials which amounts to an indirect tax on the country as a whole; a tax which will be converted to campaign slogans and bragging about how Senator “So&So” brought home the bacon. Unfortunately, the entire country has to buy that pig although few us will get to sit down to the meal.
Much to my amazement Senator Harkin (D) IA. , gave a long and tedious speech about how the “sun shines” on all the earmarks and these are public knowledge, and how this is somehow the right of Senators to continue to spend us into un-repayable debt while indirectly taxing us to promote their campaigns. Using the words “sunshine, transparency, and the CONSTITUTION, Harkin claimed it was their constitutional right to spend money we don’t have just to make themselves look good at home.
I found this speech all the more amazing as Mr. Harkin just voted for cloture on S.510, the fake food safety bill, which assaults any number of constitutional rights of individuals. It appears obvious those “rights” only apply to the Senate as far as Harkin is concerned. During his high drama speech on S.510, filled with skewed data, and the usual bleating and crying about people “dying and suffering” right now!, which he claimed he had personally worked on for years, it seems the Senator didn’t recollect anything about the Constitution as it pertained to the citizenry. Must be some kind of congressional Alzheimers; selective memory or expedient mis-recollection. Whatever it is, Harkin seems to be in advanced stages of the disease.
It also seems glaringly apparent that few Senators, nor any one else in government for that matter, have any comprehension or concern for the enormous debt that is piling up as we are systematically driven into a debt so massive and so incomprehensible to the average person, that the actual numbers cause the mind to go numb.
I find it appalling that with 22 million Americans out of work, 48 million families on food stamps, the Federal Reserve poised to collapse the dollar, no one willing to buy any more of our treasuries due to our massive and unrepayable debt load, that any government official, much less a Senator would advocate for a practice that costs the country annually, 350 BILLION dollars! With annual revenues in the toilet due to massive unemployment, the idea that any Senator would be enraged by the idea that one of his cash cows was about to be tipped over while the country slips further into economic collapse, just infuriates me.
So, to Senator Harkin and all those other government officials who obviously believe that money does grow on trees:
I personally believe that any Senator or Representative who obtains the benefits of indirect campaign promotion through the use of earmarks, should be required to pay taxes on those funds and should also be required to forfeit their annual salary as an act of good faith to offset the debt they created through the practice of earmarks.
Hitting them in their pockets while they pick our pockets might slow the progression of one of the most corrupt practices in congress.
a) Whoever, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duties, directly or indirectly—
(1) demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept any compensation for any representational services, as agent or attorney or otherwise, rendered or to be rendered either personally or by another—
_______________________________________________
The Senate has convened and will vote again for cloture on S.510; at this moment Senator Tom Harkin is speaking about why the bill is so important. Echoing the drama of Senator Durbin, Harkin alludes to the “sick and dying” people in this country as a result of food borne illness. All the drama aside: neither Harkin, Durbin nor any other Senator will identify the true sources of food contamination arising from industrialized farming and ranching, self-inspecting processing plants, and contaminated food imports coming into the country uninspected.
Regardless of all the flowery language, all the hyped up drama issuing from these Senators who have remained totally silent as the FDA, the agency they intend to unlawfully empower, has been the facilitator for hundreds of lethal and deadly pharmaceuticals allowed into the markets that cause physical damage and even death in thousands of cases. With this in mind I doubt anyone could conclude that this bill is in reality about food safety, but is instead about the transfer of power to a corporate agency belonging to the Federal corporation; the intent of course is to also transfer blame for what will ensue once this overthrow of agriculture is completed.
Neither Senator nor any of the bills sponsors make any mention of the subjugation to unlawful trade and harmonization agreements or the underlying assaults on Constitutional rights. Not one speaker can claim anything other than systems already in place as pertaining to food safety that are reiterated in the bill. The focus of the bill is: More
Americans never used to worry about tyranny. Fear of oppression is a twenty-first century phenomenon. Before the millennium, we felt comfortable that we would be protected by our system and heritage. Sure, the government might misstep, and the United States Constitution had been eroded, but few believed that the people in power actually intended to harm us. More
The United States does not have exclusive ownership of the Mississippi River. This is evidenced by the statutes within the United States Code (U.S.C.). Let’s start with the Constitution at Article VI.
The first paragraph of Article VI of the Constitution reads as follows:
“All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.”
This simple paragraph lays waste to the commonly held opinion that the Articles of Confederation were simply abandoned with the ratification of the Constitution. To understand the history of the United States one must study the official historical legislative documents of the United States.
After the revolution, the Peace Treaty of 1783 was made between the United States and Great Britain. A copy of the Peace Treaty of 1783 is included: Peace Treaty of 1783. This was during the time that the Articles of Confederation were the governing law of the land. Article 8 of the Peace Treaty of 1783 follows:
“The navigation of the river Mississippi, from its source to the ocean, shall forever remain free and open to the subjects of Great Britain and the citizens of the United States.”
At the time that the Peace Treaty of 1783 was made, the Mississippi River was basically the western border of the new United States of America. The Spanish, the French, and Great Britain were all still vying for the remaining land of the New World. More
THE SEARCH FOR LIABILITY IN THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
The federal government has no jurisdiction over intrastate commerce because the Declaration of Independence is the organic law of the land and its main tenet is that “all men are created equal”. To make the importing of articles from the U.S. possessions fall under the foreign commerce clause, the U.S. possessions are treated as foreign countries (see 26 USC §§ 2014(g), 865(i)(3), and 872(b)(7) for examples). More
In consideration of the sanctity of the United States Constitution—the bible of our Republic—my research has gravitated to obtaining an in depth comprehension of the forces from without our national borders to those crouching within, of the seditious threats we are now faced with.
Sedition and treason are often confused terms. Let The “Lectric Law Library[1] define these for us: More
Marti Oakley w/ Paul Griepentrog (c)copyright 2010
______________________________________________
“A formal rebuttal was filed regarding FDA’s claim of intrastate authority on the Federal Register, wherein the FDA sought to gain authority for rulemaking and thereby having commenced an action. Having failed to respond, the FDA is therefore in default pursuant to Federal Rule 36 and has acquiesced by silence to the fact that it has no authority over intrastate trade.”
___________________________________________
Honorable Senators;?
The proposed bill S 510 leaves much to be desired in its application from a judicial aspect. It voids due process of law and equal protection under the law by allowing the administrator to have only a “reason to believe” to initiate a takings against a food producer in the form of a recall. These same applications conspicuously do not apply to corporate producers. In the case of the individual, it is a clear abrogation of rights perpetrated by a political body which seems intent on depriving the people of their rights.
We find it difficult to believe that you, as Senators, would not be aware of the fact that you are intentionally abrogating the rights of individuals and are actively promoting the idea that prohibiting access to the courts and subjecting individuals to police state provisions, intended only to make it impossible for family and independent producers to remain in agriculture, would somehow be lawful. We find it disgusting that you would, using the jingosims of “food safety and food security”, hand the control of food production and supply over to corporations and international interests who are interested only in profits and how to control profits even if it destroys clean, safe food.
These bills effectively convert the right to produce and share food that has been enjoyed since agrarian societies emerged, into a criminal activity. If what you are contemplating can only be accomplished by violating the rights of the people….whose interests are you really serving? More
You might not have seen it reported, but the Senate will vote this morning on whether to repeal part of ObamaCare that it passed only months ago. The White House is opposed, but this fight is likely to be the first of many as Americans discover—as Nancy Pelosi once famously predicted—what’s in the bill….
A person cannot live in a surveillance society while at the same time living in a free society. All citizens want accountability from our elected leaders regardless of what political party they represent. We are accountable as well to future generations and to honor those that have defended our freedom. It is said that ignorance is not an excuse for breaking the law. Ignorance is no excuse for losing our freedom. For yourself, for our children and for those that have given the ultimate sacrifice for our country, read this short book and decide if freedom still lives. The author has written legislation, testified about that legislation and worked with groups/organizations at the state/national level to protect your freedom.
This includes the book and a DVD. >>>>>GO HERE TO ORDER
We will be at the Nashville Farmers’ Market at 1:00 this Saturday afternoon, Sept. 4, protesting S510, and distributing flyers. We plan to do this two weekends in a row.
Our senator Lamar Alexander, former Presidential candidate, as well as former Governor of Tennessee and Mr. New World Order boy, is a co- sponsor. He needs to be dragged out of the Senate, arrested and tried for treason. This bill is so egregious, and so unconstitutional, it is sheer madness, and many people just don’t know about it.
Therefore, we want to encourage everyone to get out in their areas with the flyers provided HERE, hand them out, and post them around your home town. Post this flyer in legal, easily visible locations. Pass it out to friends, family, and people you meet. Please do not post flyers on private or government property.
We would also like to encourage people to make YouTube videos of their activism. Please tag Republic Defiance and Farm Wars in your YouTube video. If you send a link of your YouTube video recording your event, we will post it.
You may contact Republic Defiance or Wally Paul on Facebook, or send us an e-mail at republicdefiance@gmail.com to find out more about this event.
Help us draw a line in the sand. This bill must die.
Lynn Swearingen (c) copyright 2010 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The Testor Amendment. – It’ll free my direct sales to consumers. Or so the “opposition” to S. 510 seems to be saying now.
Once I started reading this, “shock kept me up all night” would be an understatement.
Attempting to understand the logic behind the argument that somehow Legislators and AgriBusiness lobbyists are now “backing down” from the onerous control methods that have been written, fought for, and negotiated since the introduction of S. 510 in March of 2009 – I became even more confused.
Why suddenly would Sally Sunshine be allowed to sell her Strawberries to Safeway with no “involvement” under S 510?
The answer in short is she won’t. The “Grocery Store” will be required to keep records of Sally Sunshine. And in the event of “reasonable belief” or “reasonable possibility” – Sally Sunshine is going down first.
The language is included here below (partial pages 122 and 123):
(G) GROCERY STORES.—With respect to a
17 sale of a food described in subparagraph (H) to
18 a grocery store, the Secretary shall not require
19 such grocery store to maintain records under
20 this subsection other than records documenting
21 the farm that was the source of such food. The
22 Secretary shall not require that such records be
23 kept for more than 180 days.
24 (H) FARM SALES TO CONSUMERS.—The
25 Secretary shall not require a farm to maintain
1 any distribution records under this subsection
2 with respect to a sale of a food described in
3 subparagraph (I) (including a sale of a food
4 that is produced and packaged on such farm),
5 if such sale is made by the farm directly to a
6 consumer. More
“Sometimes it is mind numbing to consider just how gullible and easily duped we can be. Are we really just going to change the center stage actors and believe that by doing so we will affect change? Or, that anything will actually change? Are we that stupid? Is there really anyone out there who honestly believes that electing Republicans will change anything at all?_____________________________________
The last ten years have seen the most overt assaults on the constitution, our civil liberties and our right to be left alone by government. In 2000, with a new president enthroned by the Supreme Court rather than by election, the faction of congress which calls itself [Republican] began the dismantling of our sovereignty and our constitution, in earnest. By 2006, compassionate conservatism, a true oxymoron, had done as much damage as it could and over the next few years, the torch was passed to the other faction, the [Democrats]. Either way we got the same thing, the establishment of multi-national corporations as government, with congress simply acting as the facilitator for corporate takeover.
2008 saw Democrats take control of both houses of congress and election of a new president. And didn’t we all give a sigh of relief? Didn’t most of us who had been waiting to exhale after eight years of near dictatorial rule by the Bush Administration, the absolute corruption of power and the open hostility of government towards the people, suddenly feel as if some burden had been lifted from us? That somehow all the egregious assaults on America, perpetrated by its own government, would somehow be righted? That our instinctive fear of this grossly expanding government that was intruding steadily into our lives, that viewed us as the enemy, would be subdued by voting into office anyone but more Republicans? Didn’t we believe the Democrats would save the day? More
“Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it..
Consider this opinion of the Supreme Court:
“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.
An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.”
“Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it..
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one.
An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law.
Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177. (late 2nd Ed. Section 256)
reason.tv: “How did a clause intended as a restriction on states wind up giving Congress a green light to regulate noncommercial, local, and purely private behavior? How will ObamaCare stand up against the legal challenges brought by the states? Legal titans John Eastman (Chapman University Law Professor) and Erwin Chemerinsky (Founding Dean, University of California, Irvine School of Law) slug it out to to determine whether or not Congress has been abusing the commerce clause.”
Marti Oakley (c) coyright 2010 All Rights Reserved
______________________________________
“How” would more likely be, how to bring the US into full compliance with CODEX when we the people are fully aware that this system is intended to reduce standards and regulations in every country unfortunate enough to have adopted this plan for global control of the food supply by multi-national corporations. “
_____________________________________
It appears obvious that the massive public backlash against Codex Alimentarius, has not only fallen on the deaf ears of congress, but is set to be ignored. Apparently, hundreds of thousands letters of objection, hundreds of thousands of phone calls, and communications of all types demanding that CODEX be rejected as harmful to the economic growth, the freedom to determine how we will produce food and how we will market it and the right to be free of devastating international agreements that do not have the force of law in the United States……have been rejected in favor of unconstitutional agreements of all kinds, most especially the CODEX Alimentarius.
Now then; If we the people understand that these agreements are harmful and not in the best interest of moving the nation forward…if we the people know that these agreements are in direct violation of our laws and constitution……
WHY IS CONGRESS EVEN CONSIDERING THE CONTENTS OF THIS BILL?
S.510 Sect. 306 Building Capacity Of Foreign Governments with Respect to Food
(c) Plan—-The plan developed under subsection (a) shall include, as appropriate, the following:
(5) Recommendations on whether and how to harmonize requirements under CODEX ALIMENTARIUS. More
Marti Oakley (c) copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved
_______________________________________________
Sect. 419. (d) Enforcement: The secretary may coordinate with the Secretary of AG, and as appropriate, shall CONTRACT and coordinate with the agency or department designated by the governor of each state to perform activities to ensure compliance with this section.
This small section clarifies the fact that the federal government cannot interfere in agriculture. In light of this, the “secretaries” of the private corporations ie., the USDA, FDA, HHS and HSD will collude with the governors of the states to determine which state level department (corporation) will enter into a private corporate contract with these federal agencies.
Without this corporate contracting, the federal government cannot gain access to the states to implement their “business plans”, S.510 “The corporate takeover of agriculture”
S.510 cannot be forced onto the states as simply a federal law. There is no enacting clause, or constitutional authority for the creation, passage and implementation of this law. More
It was a beautiful, rain free day on August 7th at the Capitol Steps in Albany where freedom loving New Yorkers gathered in support of the United States Constitution, focusing on the Amendment. The rally began as patriotic music, including songs by local bands the Ameros and American Spirit Unbroken, played while tables were set up by the speakers and candidates. Organizers, driven by the desire to spread the message of the importance of State’s Rights in restoring our Republic and individual liberty, coordinated this event in six weeks with minimal experience and funding.
John Wallace Comments at the Rally (Video):
Part I (4 minutes)
Part II (7 minutes)
The rally was mainly promoted via internet and some radio announcements from Hudson, NY where many of the organizers originate. Traditionally, New York is a left-wing state, but this is a spark that will set afire many more people in the state toward stopping the Federal Government’s intrusion on our liberties. More
The Manta.com website includes a database of over 63 million US and foreign companies. That database info is provided by Dunn & Bradstreet (D&B). Manta.com will provide preliminary information on each of these millions of companies for free. If you want more “in-depth” info, there’s a fee.
But since this article is about “funny” stuff, and paying fees isn’t fun, let’s run a few free searches and see what we can find. You might be surprised.
For example, if you type “Government of the United States” into the Manta.com search engine, you’ll be whisked to a list of “7,666 matching US companies”.
The first “company” on the list is:
“Government of the United States (US Government) HQ
“the u.s. Capitol Washington DC”
The “HQ” stands for “headquarters”.
If you scroll down the list of other companies below the “Government of the United States,” you’ll find “branches” like “Executive Office of the United States Government” (6 entries), “United States Department of the Air Force (US Government),” “The Navy United States Department of (US Government Naval Reserves),” and “United States Court of Appeals For The 11th Circuit United States Courthouse”.
Apparently, the Navy, Air Force and Courts are “companies”.
That’s kinda “funny,” doncha think?
If you click on the “Government of the United States HQ” link, you’ll see another website page with some fairly detailed—and possibly bewildering—information.
For example, you’ll see that this “Government of the United States” has its address at:
“the u.s. capitol
“Washington, DC 20515-0001”
Its phone number is “(202) 224-3121 (202) 224-3121 ”. Business Hours are “24/7”.
You can click the “map” link and see a graphic indicating that this “Government” is located on “Capitol Hill” (same place as Congress) in Washington DC.
None of that seems particularly surprising (other than the idea that our “Government” might be a “company” and/or a conglomerate of “companies”). But the Manta.com report does begin to seem a little strange under the heading “About Government Of The United States” where we read:
“government, owner archbishop deric r. mccloud of basilica shrine michigan and 4th ne street washington,dc”. READ MORE
Lynn Swearingen (c) copyright 2010 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Most Friday nights people head on over to Jimmy’s Old Time Tavern to take in the “local flavor” according to the bloated heavy text website “Virginia Living” just beggin’ y’all to come see this little suburb of D.C.
Before one considers this fun little jaunt, reflection upon how Virgina’s obscure little rules concerning Tavern behavior might affect the patrons and employees is in order.
1. You might be pulled out of Jimmy’s to prove your sobriety at whim. Apparently this popular practice began in 2003. After all, pulling patrons out of a Tavern looking for someone intoxicated instead of actually following them on the highway where they might be driving drunk is such a good plan.
As the designated driver in her dinner party, Pat Habib was careful to consume no more than one alcoholic drink and follow it up with two sodas.
So she was shocked when a police officer singled her out of the crowd at Jimmy’s Old Town Tavern in Herndon and asked her to step outside to prove her sobriety. After she ran through the alphabet without pause, the Fairfax County police officer let her go and explained police had received a complaint about an unruly blond woman matching her description. Then she watched as police tested other women looking nothing like her. More
A real danger does exist however when organisations like the SPLC begin to profile Americans according to their own labels and then supply their information to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) fusion centers, and finally distribute them to local police agencies”
________________________________________________
21st Century Wire The Southern Poverty Law Center’s latest Associated Press release entitled, Baffling beliefs mark Sovereign Citizen theories, is the organization’s most recent effort to marginalize large blocks of the population it deems to be a domestic threat. Examination of this, as well as other documents, reveals a systematic pattern of media manipulation and disinformation aimed squarely at the American people.
In the latest release the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) identifies, “the number of people who now consider themselves sovereign citizens, Americans above the law who adhere only to the Constitution and follow a revised history of the United States”.
For any students of critical thinking, the SPLC is employing a 20th century propaganda technique known as doublespeak. Here the SPLC attempts to construct the doublethink idea that such Americans who adhere only to the Constitution are “above the law”.
Next it offers out proponents of sound money by railing against them, “The gold standard and bankruptcy: Belief that the country went bankrupt in 1933 when it suspended the gold standard and no longer had collateral to back its loans.” By spinning the conversation in one direction, here the SPLC states what is actual fact in the US and what few economists and historians will argue- that the country is bankrupt and has no real collateral for its loans, but attempts to paint this real-and-present economic reality as a ‘conspiracy theory’ propagated by so-called extremists. More
In this 3-part video interview with Tony DeMeo, Sheriff of Nye County, Nevada, he explains that he is a Constitutional Sheriff and that authority for public office holders is derived from the people. He tells the story about how he used the Constitution as his foundation in the saga of Nye County rancher Wayne Hage’s disputes over encroachments by the federal government. While Wayne Hage’s case centered around property rights in federally managed lands, Sheriff Tony DeMeo’s example is relevant for everyone to understand the power of local government, the importance of following the Constitution and upholding the Tenth Amendment (states’ rights and sovereignty).
Wayne Hage, the author of “Storm Over Rangelands, Private Rights in Federal Lands” owned the Pine Creek cattle ranch in Nye County. Wayne Hage wrote his book after suffering illegal cattle seizures by armed federal agents and chronicled the history of how the robber baron bankers and railroad magnates monopolized the western states over 100 years ago. Hage wrote that the northern core financiers were aware that there are two ways to monopolize any resource, “One, get all of it for yourself that you can; two, keep anybody else from getting what you can’t.” Public Lands and National Forests were created along with restrictive regulations, using environmental protection as the excuse. More
THE STATE SOVEREIGNTY MOVEMENT IS COMING TO NEW YORK STATE ON AUGUST 7TH
There has been a movement growing in America over the past two years as the people have come to realize that the ever growing Federal Government is becoming more and more intrusive into their daily private lives and that their personal Liberty and individual Freedoms are in danger of being severely limited or lost all together. Because of this, state legislatures in a growing number of states have recently passed State Sovereignty bills designed to reaffirm their constitutional guaranteed rights of sovereignty under the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The 10th Amendment, which is part of the Bill of Rights, states: More
Controlling currency is key to the financial “elite’s” end game. They’ve done this through their central banks, fiat money, usury, etc. as a means to control nations through their currencies.
The British, seeing a U.S. colony plum, couldn’t defeat America militarily during the revolution, so they tried again in the War of 1812. They succeeded in burning the White House and Capitol before being defeated again a couple years later; agreeing to a treaty in 1814.
Everyone went home.
But the London bankers, undeterred it seems, set out on a course to do financially what they could not do militarily. Not content to think small, they began to plan and establish banks around the world; their intent being to control these countries’ through their currencies. More
A Rally in Support of the U.S. Constitution and New York State Sovereignty
Albany, NY – August 7th
All Freedom and Liberty-loving Americans are invited to a rally in support of the U.S. Constitution and New York State Sovereignty. Many grassroots candidates from the area, many Sheriff’s from New York State and other states, Tea Party groups, Oath Keeper groups, 912 groups, Campaign for Liberty groups, We the People and many other Liberty groups will be there in support of the 9th and 10th Amendment. We are inviting all other liberty groups from New York and nearby states that would like to join New York in solidarity, with all of us coming together under the 10th Amendment with one single message for our elected and appointed officials in both Washington and Albany:
(Note: How the mighty have fallen! Pennsylvania, the womb of secession, now cozies up to the DC criminals wantonly. The author makes some great points, and is at least thinking thoughts of true liberty. Some of his solutions for secession need a tune-up but one must start where one finds one’s self. Good work, Joseph.)
____________________________________________
A majority of We the People appear to have finally reached the limits of our tolerance of the arrogance emanating from Washington and its elected servants of the People. Perpetual war, profligate spending, bailouts for irresponsible banks and Wall Street fat cats, the takeover of significant parts of our economy such as the auto and banking industries to name but two, and now the near certainty of a federal takeover of our health care system have pushed many of the People to the edge. How can the People fight back and reclaim their government? Let’s list possible options and then assess the prospects for success of each.
We can replace all elected officials; we can proclaim all unconstitutional statutes and mandates null and void in our particular state. We can amend the federal constitution, or we can secede from the union of united States and reclaim our sovereignty as an independent republic.
The first and theoretically easiest solution is to throw the bums out and replace them with new people who will then obey the constraints of the Constitution. The problem is that under our current electoral system which gives artificial entities that do not have the right to vote, like corporations, unlimited power to supply money to both major political parties; those entities exert inordinate power to influence elections. Those same political parties then lavish their money on candidates who will support the agenda of those corporate donors so as to guarantee the continued flow of money to the two major political parties. More
While I tried to stay out of the fray on the “birther” issue……Here is Obama himself saying that he is not a US born citizen…..and that it should make no difference. That’s all she wrote folks! Get him out of there! Marti
It turns out this video was created just for the fun of it and is actually just a skilled manipulation of soundbites and footage. The error was mine in posting it, believing it was real. Marti
In a speech on Thursday at American University in Washington, D.C., President Obama announced plans to enroll 15 million new Democrat voters by the year 2016 by way of an amnesty for illegal aliens. Then he denounced Republicans for blocking a “bipartisan approach” to that legislation.
Didn’t happen, you say? Yes, it did. The proposed transaction was given a code name and reported by the mainstream news media as “comprehensive immigration reform.” More
From the statements by Rosa Delauro to the House committee: While the administration asked for $14.2 million for this program, we do not feel it is a good use of resources to fund NAIS until the agency develops aclear plan for a mandatory system with measurable goals, long-term funding levels, and a plan for successful implementation. (emphasis mine)
Dear Ms DeLauro:
Your insistence on a mandatory system for the National Animal Identification System, one clearly rejected by the majority of the independent and family agricultural and livestock community across the nation, is not lawful. You are a legislator and should be fully aware of this, and I believe you are. More
ANSWER: The Vatican along with The Crown drafted the constitution, and the King’s agents delivered it to the aristocrats in America for witnessing. [SOURCE: The Myth and The Reality, by The Informer, Pages 22-27.]”
_______________________________________
Part Three
OBJECTIVE: If you do not know where you came from, then you certainly cannot know where you are going. It is time to review history and pull together some of the lesser known facts for edification and purification of what America was, is and chooses to become. This is important.
22. What other names were given to the British International Bankers in history? More
To hear Obama proposing Indefinite Prolonged Detention without evidence, you may access the video-sound tape at the following two web addresses:
Innocent Americans increasingly are sent to prison based on false evidence manufactured by police forensic crime labs. Now President Obama wants the power to incarcerate U.S. Citizens not on evidence, but for what they might do.
Compare: Two days after the 1933 burning of Germany’s Parliament Building, blamed on communists, Hitler responded with a powerful speech before Parliament. Hitler asked Parliament to suspend sections of the Reich Constitution that protected Citizens’ Rights and Civil Liberties. Hitler said the suspension was necessary so government could protect the homeland from being destroyed by communists. Hitler promised Parliament the Constitution would later be restored. After Parliament passed Hitler’s Discriminatory Decrees and Hitler signed it February 28, 1933, Hitler immediately used the news laws to abolished Parliament. See Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Laws below: More
By James P. Harvey (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved
__________________________________________
SECESSION
Let’s look at the bright side of secession first. There are now fifty States with slightly different Constitutions and laws governing the lives of their citizens, and an agreement between the States on several issues of which Banking and a common defense against rogue Nations is considered the most important.
Citizens who are unhappy with their State laws have the right to move to another State, take up residence, engage in commerce, or any of many life styles. All of the citizens with different world views could find their utopia, because each State now has their own State Bank and own one fiftieth of the American National Bank of International Settlements, where the Dollar is now a commodity backed currency. The ANBIS is staffed with an equal number of State employees and full disclosure of all actions is freely circulated among the States. No outsiders can gain access to the oversight of the Bank. New businesses are springing up like weeds. I invested in a moving company and can now afford a private tutor. While all of this has been going on, the International Bankers and their tens of thousands of agents have been visiting Jupiter.
RESTORATION
The restoration of the Constitution to the original intent of the founders would be wonderful, unless you questioned who decided the original intent, who would enforce it, and if you approved of the final revision. It seems very unlikely that a majority of Americans are capable of understanding, or interested in the issue, and true to the American way, while a few people with the knowledge and intellect to debate among themselves decided how we should be governed, the vast majority watched dancing with the stars. Of course the Trillionaires were kept at bay and the con con participants, and their families were protected from extortion and or death.
REALITY
We are facing a Global Cabal of Nations owned and controlled by a global cabal of Bankers with a military big enough to conquer Jupiter, and unless we covertly organize a military strike on the Bankers, and tens of thousands of their agents spread all over the globe, we are in deep doo doo. I hate to be so negative, but if anyone thinks we can get through the organizing, redesign, and implementation of a new government that opposes the International Bankers without a nuclear strike, or something equally devastating, I suggest they have been sitting on each others heads, and now have something unmentionable for brains. I suggest there is not, and never will be, enough protection available for any corrective action to get organized, much less succeed. I also suggest that the big bang may have already occurred in the Gulf of Mexico, and we the people of America are incapable of doing a damn thing about it.
Get educated, live free as long as possible, and die fighting.
Lynn Swearingen (c) copyright 2010 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
______________________________________
Something interesting has developed in a sleepy little suburb of New York City. Apparently the concept of “One Person. One Vote” has disenfranchised a minority population. Said minority has been unable to elect one of their “own” into a 13 panel Board of Trustee position. Therefore, a brilliant concept was proposed “Every one shall have 6 votes to cast among the 13 candidates.”
The court-imposed election was held after a federal judge ruled that Port Chester’s conventional at-large trustee elections violated the Voting Rights Act. Although the village of about 30,000 residents is nearly half Hispanic, no Latino had ever been elected to any of the six trustee seats. Most voters were white, and white candidates always won. More
” Takenotice that the legislators do not write or read the legislative bills, whereby regulations are derived. Take notice that government regulators repeatedly fail to do their duties of oversight. Take notice that when government regulates business, it always finds ways to cheat the public and dupe the government regulators.”
__________________________________
This author’s opinion is based on experience, which includes 24 years inside the public education system as a science teacher and nine years inside the nuclear field as a working scientist. Also, this author spent many years in organizations with committees who rendered decisions by hook or crook. The opinions expressed herein are certified, bonafide, verified, and clarified by life experience, academic regiment, and alarming insight. Pay attention to the following details. More
“FDA is not and, by the construction of this government, cannot be authorized to determine its own jurisdiction. It must operate within the bounds of the administrative structure authorized by the legislative power harmonious with the limited, delegated powers identified in our constitutional system.”
and: See list below for names of those submitting)
_______________________________________
This comment seeks to inform the development of an FDA regulation establishing “safety standards for fresh produce at the farm and packing house” and sanctions for non-compliance. In doing so, it rebuts the jurisdictional presumption through which, under the guise of “food safety,” FDA seeks to vastly exceed the reach of its federal regulatory sphere of action.
Federal executive regulatory power is seated in and restricted to the delegations specified within the Constitution. As stated in Art. I, §8, cl. 18, “Congress shall have power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.” Regulatory jurisdiction statutorily delegated to any agency cannot exceed the jurisdiction of the legislative authority as constitutionally specified. More
Most concerned Citizens can agree that the upcoming elections – federal, state and local – may just be the most important elections in this nation’s history, and we have an idea to make them true instruments for freedom and justice. We have been active in Constitutional work for over fifty years and have a suggestion to offer you, the People of Maine, and America that could most likely change politics, as it now exists, and influence the upcoming elections for the benefit of America and her People. Our Constitutional methods have won hundreds of court cases for Citizens, removed errant public officers from office, and stopped harmful actions by major corporations. We would now like to apply these methods, which transcend party affiliations, ideologies, philosophies, agendas, and causes, to the upcoming elections. More
“All of the great minds involved in writing about Americas decline and what needs to be done to restore, or create a controllable government, would be more productive if they could design a state economy that had jobs for the working class, because that is how to wake up the masses.”******
Part 2:
In part one I eluded to the fact that early America prospered because of the availability of lesser educated men willing to work with their hands at jobs requiring diverse mechanical aptitude. Many millions of them were from other nations, and contributed to our grocery basket of human culture, but one and all had the same dream. The opportunity to work at honest labor and earn their own way was intellectually intoxicating, and the thought of one day owning their own business was enough to drive them to near suicidal effort. Most were honest, hard working family men, and the ability to support, love, and protect their family was their greatest joy. Does that sound like a good base to build a stable society on? It does to me. I have worked with men like them most of my life, and remain unfit to clean their work boots. More
Consider this a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to all members of the Senate, all members of the House, and to President Obama. I am sure you are fully aware of the intent and implications of MOUs, as each of you, in one way or another, uses them to establish the outlining of agreements between yourselves, collectively or individually, concerning the agreements you have made with individuals acting as state’s representatives or agencies; generally to avoid Constitutional prohibitions on your intended actions and in avoidance of the Constitution. I am using it in quite another fashion as you will see in the following text. More
Washington D.C., known more these days as the “district of criminals” commits so many crimes each day as a collective body that a moratorium on government should be declared until we can clean this nest of globalists, these kissers of corporate butts who seem more determined to protect their own private interests than protecting our country from obliteration by global cabals. 
James D. Best
The PPJ Gazette 