Home

News From Flouride Alert.org

Leave a comment


NEW: Scientific Consensus Statement on Environmental Agents Associated with Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Fluoride is identified as a chemical of “significant concern.” The Statement is in pdf format and takes about a minute to download. It was released February 20, 2008 – see press release.

Did you know? flouride

* Almost all of western Europe has rejected water fluoridation.

* Fluoride’s primary ‘benefits’ are topical, not systemic. There is no need to swallow fluoride.

* Children are receiving too much fluoride today. There is a need to reduce, not increase, current exposures.

* A growing body of evidence indicates that water fluoridation is ineffective and unnecessary.

* The fluoride chemical added to water is an unprocessed, industrial waste-product from the pollution scrubbers of the phosphate fertilizer industry.

* Just as fluoride can damage cells in developing teeth, fluoride can damage cells in other organs as well.

* Two-thirds of US communities, when given the chance to vote, have voted against fluoridation. Over 70 US communities have rejected water fluoridation since 1999.

Water privatization backgrounder by Public Citizen.org

Leave a comment

Excerpted:   

“Corporations and investors are ramping up a concerted, multi-pronged effort aimed at forcing governments to privatize public services and to commodify water in the global commons. Already, much of England and France have privatized water systems. The result has been rate increases, deteriorating service, loss of local control and increased corruption. Since water services were privatized in France, customer fees have increased by as much as 150%. A number of public officials have been convicted of accepting bribes from companies bidding on public service contracts and sentenced to time in prison.

Private corporations seek to increase profit margins by cutting costs; hence lay-offs and inferior services almost always accompany privatization. In England, private companies fired nearly 25% of the work force, approximately 100,000 workers, when they acquired rights to the water system. Delays in service and accidents routinely follow the firing of often the more experienced personnel. Since 1999, Thames Water, the largest water and wastewater company in England, has been convicted of environmental and public health violations two dozen times and fined roughly $700,000 after allowing raw sewage to flow into open waterways, over streets, onto people’s lawns and over children’s toys—even into people’s homes.

The same multinational corporations aggressively taking over the management of public water services around the world are now vying for the lucrative U.S. market, one of the world’s largest with annual revenues estimated at $90 billion. A change to the U.S. tax code in 1997 opened the way to greater private sector involvement in the U.S. water delivery and treatment business. Companies are now able to bid on 20-year contracts that include the operation, design of new plants or upgrades, maintenance and even complete transfer of ownership of water systems to the private sector. Until now, mainly small public utility operators have controlled the U.S. water industry. In rural areas, small, privately owned utilities were common, but multinational corporations are rapidly buying even these out. These companies have weaseled into venues like the U.S. Conference of Mayors where they peddle privatization as a simple, cost-saving solution to cities’ aging infrastructures and regulatory compliance headaches.

On a global scale, water privatization is being pushed by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund in dozens of financially-strapped countries, where global water conglomerates are dramatically raising the price of water beyond the reach of the poor and profiting from the Global South’s search for solutions to its water crises. Corporations, such as Vivendi, Suez, RWE and Bechtel, cherry pick the profitable urban water systems while letting shantytowns and rural areas fall by the wayside. The World Bank has made privatization of urban water systems a condition for receiving new loans and debt cancellation. In Ghana in 2001, the World Bank required urban water rates to be increased 95% to prepare for privatization by making the water system appear more lucrative for international bidders. Following these rate increases, a number of people were jailed for being unable to pay their water bills. Many people who live in urban slums without access to tap water pay even higher prices for water delivered by private tanker truck operators. The poor, particularly women or girls whose traditional duties include collecting water, and babies suffer considerable hardship, illness and even death when they are forced to consume unsafe water after public supplies become too expensive.”

http://www.citizen.org/cmep/Water/activist/articles.cfm?ID=9589

This is a large article but well worth reading.  Please note the comment that corporations have only one duty…..to make money.  Privatizing our water supplies is not in the interest of the public. 

Thirst: Fighting the Corporate Theft of Our Water

Leave a comment

By Alan Snitow & Deborah Kaufman, with Michael Fox
Jossey-Bass/Wiley & Sons, 2007

THIRST investigates eight recent high-profile controversies over the corporate takeover of water in the U.S, and illuminates how citizens are fighting back in heartland communities like Stockton, CA, Lexington, KY, Holyoke, MA, and Mecosta County, MI. Political corruption, high stakes financial takeovers, and behind the scenes maneuvering by some of the richest corporations characterize a David and Goliath battle in which local citizens muster creative and often surprising organizing methods to preserve their right to local, public control of this precious resource.

The PBS documentary Thirst showed how communities around the world are resisting the privatization and commodification of water.  Now THIRST, the book, picks up where the documentary left off, revealing the emergence of controversial new water wars here in the United States.

THIRST exposes the corporate attempts to:

  • Take over municipal control of water in communities around the country
  • Buy up rights to groundwater in the US
  • Create and corner the market on bottled water

It also shows how people in affected communities are fighting back to keep water affordable, accessible, sustainable and public:

  • By creating new methods to challenge the corporate juggernaut in an age of globalization
  • By challenging tired clichés of Republican and Democratic political alignments

We are at the tipping point in the new, global water wars. The United States is ground zero. What happens in the next few years will determine the fate of water and our basic democratic rights. THIRST is a battlefield account of the conflict.

ww.thirstthemovie.org/book.html

A call to End Water Fluoridation

2 Comments

February 21, 2008: 1,489 Professionals Call for an End to Water Fluoridation

  • Professionals’ Statement to End Fluoridation
  • U.S. signers A-M and N-Z International signers
  • The signers include:
    • 211 Dentists (DDS, DMD, BDS)
    210 PhD’s (includes DSc, Doctor of Science)
    • 190 MD’s (includes MBBS)
    • 176 DC’s (Doctor of Chiropractic)
    • 150 Nurses (RN, BSN, ARNP, APRN)
    • 89 ND’s (Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine)
    • 40 Lawyers (JD and LLB)
    • 30 RDHs (Registered Dental Hygienist and RDHAP)
    • 23 Pharmacists (Pharm.D, B. Pharm, RPH)
    • 20 Acupuncturists (LAc -Licensed Acupuncturist; MAc -Master Acupuncturist)
    • 15 DO’s (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine)
  • If you are a professional, add your name to the Statement.

www.fluoridealert.org

Videos to view online at fluoridealert.org (click fluoridealert.org in the blogroll)


TAKE ACTION! Sign the Online Message to Congress!

UPDATE: Over 9,400 signers to Online Petition

http://www.fluoridealert.org/

 

 

Why oppose privatization of water?

Leave a comment

Water privatization schemes throughout the world have a track record of skyrocketing prices, water quality problems, deteriorating service and a loss of local control.

Privatization advocates argue – usually without any supporting evidence – that switching from publicly owned and operated utilities to private sector firms will lead to greater economic efficiency, stabilized rates, reduced public debt and improved budgetary management.

In reality, privatization more often than not fulfills none of these promises, and instead creates a number of new problems. Vulnerable to corruption and operating according to a profit-driven corporate agenda fundamentally incompatible with delivering an essential service, private water companies are failing to provide citizens with safe, affordable water. Private corporations seek to increase profit margins by cutting costs; hence privatization is almost always accompanied by lay-offs.

Turning Up the Tap: How the Private Water Industry Wants to Boost Profits – At the Expense of Taxpayers (pdf)

Activists’ Guide to Fight Water Privatization

This is an introductory guide to being a water privatization organizer in your community. We hope you find this guide to be a useful learning tool as well as a helpful resource for information on the water industry. To make this guide easy to navigate, we have divided it into sections. Please keep in mind that Public Citizen’s Water For All team is always available to help you build your own campaign. Please email us or call us at 202-588-1000 and ask to speak with someone on the Water For All campaign.

This is the how-to section of the water activist guide. Public Citizen’s Water for All Campaign is always available to assist you in starting your own campaign in your home town. We can help you with media strategy, contacting the right government officials at the local, state, and federal levels, as well as suggesting creative ways to draw attention to your struggle. We can also provide research, background information, and reports – ALL FOR FREE – to build your case against a particular water company or privatization bid.

Full comprehensive guide: Citizen’s Guide to Water Privatization (pdf) PDF

http://www.citizen.org/cmep/Water/activist/

Because Public Citizen does not accept funds from corporations, professional associations or government agencies, we can remain independent and follow the truth wherever it may lead. But that means we depend on the generosity of concerned citizens like you for the resources to fight on behalf of the public interest. If you would like to help us in our fight, click here.

PRA Opposes Clean Water Restoration Act

Leave a comment


On behalf of Property Rights Alliance, I am writing to express concern over the “Clean Water Restoration Act” (H.R. 2421). H.R. 2421 would infringe on the rights of property owners across the nation and result in an unprecedented expansion of the regulatory authority of the federal government.

The Clean Water Restoration Act, sponsored by Rep. James Oberstar, seeks to re-establish the nearly unlimited powers of the Clean Water Act lost due to U.S. Supreme Court decisions in 2001 and 2006. While supporters of H.R. 2421 contend the intent is to end jurisdictional confusion, in actuality, H.R. 2421 gives the federal government the power to regulate all interstate and intrastate waters, including non-navigable waters. PRA is concerned that H.R. 2421 exceeds the original objective of the Clean Water Act by mandating all waters be placed under the regulatory control of the federal government.

http://www.propertyrightsalliance.org/index.php?content=feature

Contact Jim Oberstar and ask him why he would support such an obvious assault on state’s rights and individual property rights, especially when the Federal government is either unwilling or unable to effectively manage or regulate any Federal program or law without corruption and special interests immediately taking it over. Be civil and polite in your contact even though this man is apparently not working on your behalf.

http://www.oberstar.org/contact/

Marti Oakley

Newer Entries