“Who Will Re-start America’s Engine?”
March 12, 2012
Government dictators, Free america, freedom, NARLO, one world government, Paralllax Prophecies, PROPERTY RIGHTS, sovereingty, world government 2 Comments
“Rise Up Americans!”
April 10, 2010
PROPERTY RIGHTS free society, NARLO.org, Ron Ewart, sovereingty, taxes Leave a comment
By Ron Ewart, President National Association of Rural Landowners and nationally recognized author on freedom and property rights issues. We are spreading the message of American Freedom around the globe. © Copyright January 20, 2009 – All Rights Reserved
_________________________________________________
Where is it written that Americans, who have been granted life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness by their Creator, at great cost, have to accept anything less? Why must we accept slavery in place of liberty? Why should we accept mediocrity in place of achievement and excellence. Why must we accept debauchery and corruption in place of morality?
Why must we accept our sovereignty being blurred by the one-world-order and centralized control of world power by the moneyed elite? Why is it we should allow millions of illegal aliens to flood into our country, take advantage of our government-mandated generosity and exclude legal Americans from available employment? How can we just sit there and do nothing when radical environmental laws eradicate what is left of our property rights? Since the time of the Magna Carta in 1215 and later in the writings of John Locke, it has been known that without property rights, no other rights are possible.
By what right or authority does government have, to use our tax money, that is taken from us at the point of a gun, to reward failure, penalize success and choose winners and losers, that only the free markets should be able to do in a free society? Under what law does the non-producer have a right to the fruits and labors of the producer, except by the voluntary generosity of that producer? More
Ohio Issue 2: Cementing Corporate Agribusiness
October 19, 2009
Constitution agribusiness, biopiracy, constitutional assaults, family farms, livestock, Ohio, Ohio Farm Bureau, Ohio Pork Producers, poultry, sovereingty, state's rights, USDA 1 Comment
A full copy of the proposed assault on the Ohio constitution is attached at the end of this article. Thanks to www.ohioacts.org for compiling this comprehensive statement on what this proposed coup against Ohio sovereign citizens will actually do.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ohio Issue 2: Cementing Corporate Agribusiness
Issue 2 on the November ballot is an industry attempt to change the Ohio state constitution, establishing a “Livestock Care Standards Board” that would have unchecked power to establish standards for livestock and poultry. Technically the product of the Ohio General Assembly, the ballot issue is heavily backed by groups representing major agribusiness interests, including the Ohio Farm Bureau and The Ohio Pork Producers Council.
While masquerading as an attempt to improve food safety and animal welfare, Issue 2 in reality is an attempt by big industry to preempt statewide initiatives like the recent Proposition 2 in California,2 which phased out problematic animal production practices like battery cages for chickens. In effect, the proposed Livestock Care Standards Board would give a dozen political appointees broad and unchecked power to decide rules on animal welfare, potentially reshaping regulations on how animals are raised, tracked or traced. READ
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Commentary by: Marti Oakley with Paul Griepentrog
It appears as a result of the massive backlash against the seizure of the US food production and supply as outlined in Hr 2749 which passed the House on July 30, 2009, the corporate agricultural producers who thought they had it in the bag, who were going to be handed total control of US food production and supply as a result of political cronyism, aren’t quite getting what they wanted as fast as they anticipated. More
Minnesota joins the sovereignty sideshow….blah, blah, blah
February 25, 2009
Constitution democrats, Minnesota, republicans, sovereingty, state's rights 1 Comment
All the legislative saber rattling by successive states, declaring sovereignty, is less than meaningless. With the exception of a little huffing and puffing by New Hampshire, these resolutions, laws or whatever they are suppose to be, fall by the wayside just as quickly as they appeared. There is no follow up, no statement of position on any issue and absolutely no intention of actually asserting states rights over the federal government.
On February 19, 2009, in what was an outright partisan piece of grandstanding, twenty Republicans in the Minnesota House co-sponsored yet another of these absurd declarations. Although this declaration is worded to sound as if these sponsors were really concerned with federal creep and encroachment, this newly created declaration stopped short of specifying just exactly what the state of Minnesota would not participate in, subject itself to, or would reject on constitutional grounds.
In fact, not one state issued any specifics or any statements of what these declarations would be used to avoid.
Personally, I would think states making declarations of this kind would be not only newsworthy, but, I think they would also merit some little piece of acknowledgment, some little sign either from congress or the president that some kind of paradigm shift was occurring and they were aware of it. Last nights speech from President Obama somehow omitted any reference to these declarations and not one congress person in the Washington District of Criminals has made one statement or reference to their own respective states declarations of sovereignty. Not one.
In fact, not only is no one in the federal government even remotely concerned with these faux declarations, the D.C. political mafia is moving ahead with long planned expansions in government, more regulations and control, and more intrusion into the ordinary lives of people whose greatest mistake was electing these same individuals time and again and failing to boot out the majority of them in either house.
When I see declarations from any state that includes specifics on what the state will not comply with or what it will actually prohibit the federal government from mandating, I’ll be impressed. As it is, I don’t see anything but meaningless gestures with no intent to back them up. What’s the point?
© 2009 Marti Oakley















