THE CREATURE FROM THE OCEAN’S FLOOR – THE LAW OF THE SEA TREATY

 John W. Wallace/PPJ Contributor

“The Treaty would essentially give the United Nations, a notoriously corrupt, anti-American, anti-capitalist and un-democratic organization, the power to assert control over 70% of the earth’s surface.”

_________________________________________________________________

Although many Americans may never have heard of the Law of the Sea Treaty and those who did know about it probably thought it was dead on arrival in the U.S. Senate a couple of year ago, are in for a shock. Yes, the Creature from the Ocean’s Floor, better known as the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) is back and it is rearing its ugly, globalist head once again. The LOST is a national sovereignty-killing creature created by supporters of the New World Order who also want the United Nations to ultimately be the one and only world government. It is specifically designed to destroy the sovereignty of all nations, to limit the rights of their citizens and take control over the majority of the earth’s resources in the oceans, including those within America’s territorial waters. The enemies of Liberty and Freedom have created a monster that poses more of a danger to America’s sovereignty and to our individual Freedoms and Liberty than any foreign military force ever has and we must be prepared to kill the creature before it kills us.

The Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) was first conceived in the early 1980’s by the United Nations as a method for them to gain control of most of the activities on, over, and beneath the ocean’s surface. The fundamental premise of the Law of the Sea Treaty is that the resources on the ocean’s floor belong to all of the people of the world and those resources should be protected and controlled by an international organization like the United Nations. Although that may sound like a noble goal, in order to achieve this goal, the United Nations has created a multinational, bureaucratic creature called the International Seabed Authority (“ISA”) and charged this entity with regulating and controlling the world’s mineral resources in the oceans.

When President Reagan was president, he objected to several of the treaty’s provisions that would have resulted in surrendering our nation’s sovereignty and refused to sign it, but that didn’t stop the proponents of world government and the New World Order. In 1994, the “progressives (a nice term used to describe communists) at the United Nations decided to keep moving forward with their plans by creating a diversion they called an  “Agreement of Implementation” that was supposed to address the concerns of the United States and other industrialized nations. It didn’t change anything. This new agreement was all smoke and mirrors, but our Oxford educated, globalist president Bill Clinton signed it anyway.  The Senate, however, refused to ratify it, as required by the U.S. Constitution.

Government Sponsored Eco-Terrorism and the Brainwashing of your Children

LIVE LINK:   REpublic Defiance  

By Wally Paul

In 1992 Maurice Strong was the Secretary General of the historic United Nations Earth Summit in Rio. In order to ensure the success of the Summit, Strong’s wife, Hanne, held a vigil with the Wisdom-keepers, a group of “global transformationalists.” Through round-the-clock sacred fire, drumbeat, and meditation, the group “held the energy pattern” for the duration of the gathering. As described in an  article called Agenda 21 was the primary output of the Summit. It was stated at the time that this ‘blueprint for the 21st century’ would lay the necessary foundation for a subsequent “new global covenant between humanity and the Earth.” [1]

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill …
All these dangers are caused by human intervention
and it is only through changed attitudes and
behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
– Club of Rome,
The First Global Revolution,
consultants to the UN. [2]

 In many areas, government RFID tracker chips will now be monitoring what you throw away, how much you throw away and if you are recycling properly.  Rather than spending money on things that will actually get the U.S. economy headed in the right direction, government officials across America seem obsessed with forcing the ”green agenda” down the throats of the American people – even if it means chasing factories, jobs and economic activity out of their communities.  

New EU president confirms New World Order desire (19Nov09)

Citing the Lisbon Treaty, and the Copenhagen Treaty the new president of the EU, lauds the beginning of global governance with the G20 IMF governors working in the middle. 

If you disagree with the CO2/global warming proponents, you will be verbally attacked and insulted

                   By: Al Whitney   (c) Copyright 2009

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED                            

This is a difficult message to send out, because many of us have discovered that if you disagree with the CO2/global warming proponents, you will be verbally attacked and insulted. Regrettably, I participated in some of that nasty behavior myself. The good news for me is that I was able to attend a subsequent meeting of the group I had verbally attacked for their skeptical global warming position and apologize to them – which I did.

My message to the good Democrat environmentalists who care about the environment and loathe corruption
If you take the time to investigate the recently released email communications of the leading climatologists promoting man-made global warming, it becomes apparent that the CO2/global warming issue has corruption and fraud written all over it.

If you have don’t have time to review the following articles, their essence is superbly and eloquently expressed by Lord Monkton in this short 10 minute video:

Recent stories main stream media didn’t report . . .

Global Warming or Global Governance?

Something to think about:

Why would Al Gore, who is notoriously guilty of a huge amount of personal energy consumption, be touting a “global solution” to a “global problem” unless he was firmly in favor of and promoting the NWO?

Why would the mainstream media be advancing the notion of a “global warming” problem if this promotion was not dictated by its corporate masters?

Why aren’t huge corporations being targeted by this “global warming” campaign?

Why is it “we the people” who must pay the price of the “global warming” problem?

Could it be that our corporate government is allowing the atmosphere to be polluted by huge corporations in order to create a problem so that the public will go along with their “global solution?”

Could it be that this is just another tool to subjugate the masses and institute the NWO?

Something to think about…

Barb

Vodpod videos no longer available.