Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved
______________________________________________
Several state supreme courts have quietly issued new “rules” that make it illegal (not unlawful) for anyone to help a pro se litigant assemble research or contribute in any way to presenting their case. These courts however, made no such ruling regarding the use of law clerks and paralegals who routinely are used by BAR members to do the actual work required to put a case together.
_____________________________________________
There are few people these day still having any illusions about the corruption in our judicial system. As we have seen and heard, our courts are the last place to find justice or to see the rule of law applied. Our courts, once the last line of defense in legal matters, have become nothing more than government sanctioned racketeering. Reports of judicial misconduct in virtually every court system in the nation, is not only on the rise, it is being condoned by the silence of the Department of Justice, congress and state governments. Even SCOTUS decided that the corruption of the lower courts was not worthy of their superior and divine attention due in part to the high level of corruption in its own court.
They are running closed union shops
The term “closed shop” is used to signify an establishment, trade or skill which employs only members of the union. Our courts are closed union shops which are now actively writing new rules (lawmaking) to prevent anyone other than BAR union members from accessing the courts. We are now being told that it is accepted practice for judges to create their own laws, in total disregard for the constitution or individual rights and protections and with total disregard for established and accepted law. If this is in fact the case…..why can’t we create our own common courts that bypass these union shop courts? After all, the current judicial system no longer adheres to the law and instead operates as independent corporate contractors relying on code and statute or newly created laws they themselves create. I see no reason why we should have to continue to pay private contractors to violate our rights.
The underlying cause of the blatant judicial misconduct of all kinds is the BAR Association. This association represents the legal union of law practitioners and works actively to prevent anyone not belonging to their “union” from not only accessing the courts but from assembling a legal defense without paying one of their members’ massive sums of money. This payment rarely produces a defense worthy of the fees demanded.
The Bar Association in any state cannot issue licenses or permits to conduct business. It cannot issue licenses to practice law. It has however, quite successfully managed to make it virtually impossible to access the courts as judges in court after court refuse to allow anyone not belonging to their closed union shop to defend themselves without first paying one of their union members huge sums of money. It is extortion at the very least and racketeering. These associations are not however, associated with the British Accreditation Registry as some think.
“In the United States, some state bar associations are operated by their respective state governments which make membership in their state’s bar association a requirement to practice before that state’s courts; such states are said to have a “mandatory” or “integrated bar.” Membership in such associations is synonymous with being admitted to the bar or being licensed to practice law in that state or being admitted to practice before the courts of that state. The first U.S. state to integrate its bar was North Dakota in 1921. “(Read more here)
Passing the “bar” is a requirement in every state before a license to practice law will be issued by the state to ensure that the closed union shop continues unimpeded. Those passing their respective “bar” examines do not take an oath to the Crown or to England, but declare and oath to defend the constitution of United States and their states respectively. Of course it is seldom we see an honoring of that oath.
The war against pro se litigants
New laws issued by the Wisconsin Supreme Court effective January, 2011 making pro se litigation virtually impossible:
Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 23.01(1). The rules also list specific activities encompassed by the definition which include but are not limited to:
(1) Giving advice or counsel to others as to their legal rights or the legal rights or responsibilities of others for fees or other consideration.
(2) Selection, drafting, or completion for another entity or person of legal documents or agreements which affect the legal rights of the other entity or person(s).
(3) Representation of another entity or person(s) in a court, or in a formal administrative adjudicative proceeding or other formal dispute resolution process or in an administrative adjudicative proceeding in which legal pleadings are filed or a record is established as the basis for judicial review
(4) Negotiation of legal rights or responsibilities on behalf of another entity or person(s).
(5) Any other activity determined to be the practice of law by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
SCR 23.01(1).
Number (5) is one of those vaguely written, broadly interpreted to mean what ever they need it to mean whenever they need it to mean something.
Wisconsin isn’t alone:
Several state supreme courts have quietly issued new “rules” that make it illegal (not unlawful) for anyone to help a pro se litigant assemble research or contribute in any way to presenting their case. These courts however, made no such ruling regarding the use of law clerks and paralegals who routinely are used by BAR members to do the actual work required to put a case together. The object of these unlawful rules is of course, to prevent anyone not belonging to the closed union shop from mounting a suit or defense thereby bypassing back room deal making, pre-determined out comes and most likely out performing BAR union members not only in the presentation of their cases, but in actually constructing a law based case that their union opponents weren’t anticipating. The problem with pro se litigants is not that they are not prepared or up to the task, it is that most times they are far better prepared and knowledgeable about the issue at hand. Can’t have that!
The job of the courts and judges is only to interpret the law yet we see even SCOTUS creating law from the bench. We also see wide-spread protectionism as one court protects and upholds the corruption of another. Across the nation, reports come in regarding the violation of rights and the antics of corrupt judges as they prevent evidence that might refute the states case or the case of another closed union member from being presented or entering into the court record. Many times, this evidence can and does prove the corruption and/or illegal activity of state agencies and actors, or as is the case in Chemung county , New York, of current and former union members still tied to high profile law firms who have a vested interest in preventing their activities from being exposed.
Jail for judges http://www.jail4judges.org/contact.htm
As the corruption in our courts mounts we must ask ourselves why we continue to tolerate this system that has clearly outlived any usefulness. Between the militarization of police departments and the wide-spread corruption of these departments and the corruption in the courts which is blatant and growing, we have a system in place which has become a menace and a threat to our communities and citizens.
The Department of Justice is a joke and has been for decades. Our courts systems all the way up to SCOTUS present a clear and present danger to the nation at large. While our prisons fill with “criminals” who may or may not have committed a crime worthy of incarceration these black robed criminals walk freely; never held accountable for the abrogation of rights, the rigging of the system, or in many cases, the acceptance of bribery. We see rights violated, laws broken, new laws made by the judge, denial of presentation of evidence, threats of being jailed for demanding your rights, theft of property, intimidation, harassment, and a total disregard for the law. All of it emanating from the bench. So who are the real criminals here?
We need to start jailing judges. We need to put them in the position of trying to mount a defense and not being allowed to. We need to subject them to newly created laws that we our selves devised and we need to let them spend several years of their lives in the same prisons they condemned so many others to while we divvy up their assets between a few of our good close friends.
We need to do something. Personally…jail for corrupt judges would just be the beginning.
_________________________________________________________
William Windsor/11 Georgia judges to be investigated http://www.lawlessamerica.com/
Chemung county corruption http://www.estateofdenial.com/2010/11/19/sara-harvey-discusses-husbands-ny-county-mandated-guardianship/
Jail4judges http://www.jail4judges.org/contact.htm
nationwide effort to jail corrupt judges http://floridajail4judges.org/FL_initiative.html
Definition of bar association in theUS http://users.navi.net/~rsc/vandyke3.htm
Closed Union Shops defined http://education.yahoo.com/reference/encyclopedia/entry/closedsh
New practice of rule of Law…but only if they say so http://www.lwm-info.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BD746E3BD-06EB-4823-A22A-0B4AE68E7CC7%7D&DE=%7BFD3D1D5A-AA12-4A36-A5E4-34177AAFCFFB%7D
The judicial system: Closed Union Shops violating your rights — The PPJ Gazette | julian's justice journal
Aug 24, 2017 @ 17:12:51
The judicial system: Closed Union Shops violati...
May 08, 2015 @ 08:22:52
Ron Libert (Member of NASGA)
Jun 25, 2011 @ 00:34:34
The oversight committee/agency in every state to report illegal actions by an attorney or judge used to be the state Bar Association. Sometimes it even resulted in the disbarring or censuring of any attorney or judge. This is no longer the case. It appears only an attorney (member of the closed union) can now report such charges. Know any attorney who wants to sue a judge or other attorney??????
Your article is a nice wake up call to those who feel there is always an oversight entity for all aspects of the justice system. The systematic elimination of our country’s Constitution has rendered our Justice system irretrievably broken.
Ron Libert
LikeLike
OPISO » ‘The Judicial System: Closed Union Shops Violating Your Rights’
Jun 24, 2011 @ 05:33:29
Corruption of the Judiciary: Where do we go for help? « Losing Freedom
Jun 14, 2011 @ 15:48:17
Corruption of the judiciary: Where do we go for help? / We know and will tell you all what really happened today
Jun 14, 2011 @ 15:03:23
Corruption of the judiciary: Where do we go for help? « The PPJ Gazette
Jun 13, 2011 @ 03:52:50
Top Posts — WordPress.com
Jun 12, 2011 @ 23:05:58
jeff
Jun 12, 2011 @ 21:30:05
When you are born, (your Mothers’ WATER broke) your Parents Name you, for example John or Jane DOE. The Nurse or Doctor along with your Parents sign your Record of Live Birth (Title of Deed to Real Property) so your BIRTH CERTIFICATE could be created (a “certificate is a negotiable instrument; see Certi & fi-duc(e) iary & fi-cat(e) iary) for the purpose of “creating the LEGAL ENTITY/FICTION (this LEGAL ENTITY/FICTION is regulated and works in commerce as GOVERNMENT can only regulate that which it creates and it didn’t create the living breathing Man or Woman – God did). The LEGAL ENTITY/FICTION is registered by the Department of Commerce, under the ADMIRALTY MARITIME LAW/JURISDICTION (LAW of the WATER) – JURISDICTION of Commerce and War.
http://www.stopthepirates.blogspot.com
LikeLike
hybridrogue1
Jun 12, 2011 @ 17:22:11
I am glad to see that the myth of the BAR associations having anything to do with the “British Accredit Registry’ finally being recognized as the crank and red herring it is.
There is nothing like endless arguments over bunk to sink good investigative knowledge and verified truth.
Thank’s Marti for making this clear.
Willy Whitten
LikeLike
Wilb Bill
Jun 12, 2011 @ 15:51:18
One judge, two lawyers and one court reporter kill and rob more people in one year than all the felons in prison.
LikeLike
aubreyfarmer
Jun 12, 2011 @ 15:20:47
My pro se experience in Denton, Texas when I appealed a traffic ticket was an absolutely disgusting experience. When I raised the issue that the “Stalker” radar guns used by the Aubrey, Texas police department for traffic enforcement had never been subject to judicial review as far as reliability in a situation where both the police car and the accused were in moving vehicles, the judge, Bridges, stopped the proceeding and had the jury leave the room. With this strategy the judge was able to string the proceeding out for 8 hours. By the time the jury got around to a verdict they were really pissed at me. At no time was I allowed to present my case other than pointing out to the jury that the officer had not even filled out his daily activity report and recorded his results from testing his radar device for accuracy which was department policy. The judge denied my right to discovery, luckily I already had a copy of the officers daily activity report. A $140 dollar ticket cost me $312 when court costs were added. Fact is, I was speeding. Also a fact, they never proved it and it amounted to the jury taking the cops word for it. I never said I wasn’t speeding, I just wanted them to prove it, which they did not. It was worth every dime and all the time, just to prove to myself how corrupt the system is. The judge told me that if everyone chose to appeal a traffic ticket the whole system would get so backed up that it would break down. Many tickets would be dismissed due to the inability of the courts to give the defendant a speedy trial. Join the Fully Informed Jury Association. It is the easiest way in the world to beat these crooked judges and sorry piece of crap prosecutors at their own game.
LikeLike
Romantic Violence
Jun 12, 2011 @ 11:30:51
1789. It’s past due
LikeLike
Judicial system | Gnboard
Jun 12, 2011 @ 05:42:03
anadianant
Jun 12, 2011 @ 03:56:10
I’ve seen a lot of digital-ink on this issue. Also include Fringed flag, UCC, Sovereign Person….. it looks like a huge level of complexity was induced into the mix to keep people chasing their own tails.
Did Trafficante’s speech on the floor of the house ever happen? We know for sure Congressman McFadden was tireless, brave and probably died for those traits.
I do think it is beyond minutiae time now though. Reality is going to get a lot weirder.
Vivek
http://aadivaahan.wordpress.com/2011/06/09/anniversary-thoughts/
LikeLike
beijingyank
Jun 12, 2011 @ 02:50:49
Here! Here!
Earlier this year, reports of Supreme Court Judge Roberts has a slush fund to the tune of one billion dollars was discovered. The source of the account was Geitner’s U.S. Treasury. Most of Congress was also mentioned. If this was a fabulous fabrication, you would think a libel suit of massive proportions would have been filed and people would have been arrested. To date, nothing. The press is silent, no further word has emerged.
The government is controlled by gangsters and tyrants. It’s totally rogue, and the sooner the revolution begins the sooner Patriots will honor their oath to “defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic.”
LikeLike
Richard Shropshire
Jun 12, 2011 @ 02:02:06
Common Law is now uncommon? Patrick Henry, where are you now that you are needed? One can only hope for a reincarnation.
LikeLike
EARTHMAN
Jun 12, 2011 @ 01:52:42
The American Judiciary and its legal profession is broken beyond repair.
The most dangerous places on earth aren’t the streets of Compton, Newark, etc., it’s any court room in the United States.
LikeLike
Archie1954
Jun 11, 2011 @ 23:33:50
Bar Associations are supposed to set a high “bar” for membership thus assuring litigants and accused that they will receive the best legal advice possible. But since the association is managed by humans and humans err, the association errs and the judicial system errs and not on the side of justice. Judges are the law in their own courtrooms and only when a higher court allows an appeal does that law change. Until then what the judge says goes.
LikeLike
The judicial system: Closed Union Shops violating your rights « Evil of indifference
Jun 10, 2011 @ 22:17:21
Jennifer L. Penland
Jun 10, 2011 @ 20:14:22
I wonder if this has been rushed through due to the fact of Gov Walker “s (WI) ignorance of his powers, sense of direction and rights of his constituents or the morality band wagon that the mainstream media and political parties deem more worthy to debate… I concur with Lennon, apathy is here and will remain unless the huddled masses rise up and take a stand against the corporate greed and redirect our passions on human rights, hunger, and environmental issues and to provide solutions…rather than just bandaids to appease the wealthy, dominate minority…This will reflect in the necessary chaos, which will come eventually…
LikeLike