For all you nay sayers that say there isn’t a move to “harmonize” the US, Canada and Mexico into a region, take a look!!

 

  FDA Home Page | Search FDA Site | FDA A-Z Index | Contact FDA

Trilateral Cooperation Charter

Between

The Health Products and Food Branch,
Health Canada
Canada,

The Food and Drug Administration,
Department of Health and Human Services
The United States of America,

and

The Federal Commission for the Protection from
Sanitary Risks,
Secretaria de Salud
Mexico

Table of Contents

      

Trilateral Cooperation Charter

This would be the same Trilateral Commission that is claimed to be either a myth, a hoax, or just some benevolent group that has no interest in creating the North American Union or a New World Order.  A link to the entire document is included at the end.  This is a non-governmental agency being paid for by taxpayers and private interests of all three countries.  Please note when reading the entire document that Mexico, supposedly reknowned for its lack of medical care for its citizens and poor living conditions, was somehow deemed to be the appropriate authority to head up health fraud for all three countries. 

The working groups mentioned are all on the taxpayer payrolls somewhere…..but obviously hidden in some none related bill or funded through creative bookkeeping our government is so adept at. 

 

Excerpted from the entire document:

 

C. Working Groups 

The Trilateral Cooperation undertakes its work through Working Groups. Three Co-chairs representing each country head each Working Group. The Co-chairs are responsible for identifying issues for discussion and for seeking the Steering Committee’s support. Current Working Groups include the following:

• Canada-US-Mexico Compliance Information Group (CUMCIG): Its purpose is to increase the exchange of emergency preparedness and response, compliance and enforcement information between the three countries. The Group coordinates related enforcement activities with counterpart agencies in appropriate cases. Lead Country: United States of America. 

 

• Mexico-US-Canada Health Fraud Group (MUCH): Its purpose is to maintain a formal framework for cooperation in combating health fraud and to identify appropriate lines of communication to ensure a continual exchange of information on compliance and enforcement activities among the three countries. Lead Country: Mexico. 

 

• Laboratory Cooperation Working Group: Its purpose is to establish and maintain cooperation in the area of regulatory laboratory operations. Through continual discussions, this group is expected to share information with a view to building confidence in our respective analytical results. Lead Country: Canada. 

 

• Canada-US-Mexico Training Working Group: Its purpose is to share existing training information, establish a communication strategy between the Training Working Group and the other Working Groups, and to assist in identifying training needs of staff who will be engaged in Trilateral work. Lead Country: United States of America.” 

http://www.fda.gov/oia/charter.html#mission

And to think this document was actually produced on the FDA website.  What are “working groups” who operate without oversight, in violation of the Logan Act, without informed consent or approval by the citizens of any of the three countries, doing interacting with the FDA?  Under what authority are they “harmonizing” the healthcare and economies of three soveriegn countries? 

How far will this go before you decide to stand up and object?  How much are you willing to forfeit before you say ‘enough!”

Marti Oakley

This research information was provided to PPJ by JS Rugg. 

 

Bush Reaffirms North American Union Agenda At Leaders’ Summit

Opposition to ‘Security and Prosperity Partnership’ intensifies

President Bush yesterday reaffirmed a commitment to progress the much maligned Security and Prosperity Partnership agenda, amid intensified opposition from commentators and critics concerned that the plan constitutes an undermining of national sovereignty.

 

 

At a private party to open the fourth North American Leaders’ Summit in New Orleans, Bush referred to recently encountered “setbacks” and told bureaucrats and business leaders “the meeting gives three friends the chance to come together to discuss our commitment to security and prosperity, to reconfirm the need for the three of us to work in harmony together for the good of our peoples. It’s a chance to talk about how we can best protect our people and extend prosperity.”

 

 

Bush told leaders from Canada and Mexico “Tomorrow, we will be meeting with the business leaders of the North American Competitiveness Council to listen to their specific recommendations… The United States has an opportunity to continue the trading agenda.”

 

 

The North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) is an advisory Council Comprised of 30 senior private sector representatives of North American corporations that were selected by the American, Canadian and Mexican governments at the June 2006 trilateral meeting in Cancun, Mexico.

 

 

Recently uncovered documents detailed how these corporate representatives have been urged to “humanize” North American integration, promote NAFTA success stories to employees and unions and evolve the harmonization agenda “without fueling protectionism”.

 

 

The documentation consists of internal memos from Canada’s Foreign Affairs and Internal Trade ministry, which were obtained by the World Net Daily reporter Jerome Corsi under an Access to Information Act request.

Business leaders have been beseeched by bureaucratic working groups to launch public relations campaigns in order to counter critics of the secretive Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) and to report back to senior government officials with advice on an ongoing basis.

 

 

The memo highlighted how those advancing the North American integration agenda are concerned about the exposure and subsequent public backlash they have encountered recently.

Meanwhile one prominent critic of the SPP agenda, Congressman Ron Paul has vowed to intensify opposition towards the alliance and the intrinsically linked Trans-Texas Corridor and proposed NAFTA Super Highway.

 

 

As we all know, there have been significant moves recently to expand the Security and Prosperity Partnership initiated by President Bush and his Mexican and Canadian counterparts in 2005. One such plan is to construct a so-called NAFTA Superhighway running from Mexico, through Texas, and up eventually into Canada, Paul said yesterday.

 

   

 

I have opposed this project from the beginning, signing on as a co-sponsor of House Concurrent Resolution 40 expressing Congressional disapproval of the NAFTA Superhighway and any moves toward a North American Union.¡±

More recently, I introduced an even stronger piece of legislation, H.R.5191, which would prohibit the use of federal funds to carry out this highway project. The federal government has no business being partner to this outrageous plan, according to which countless landowners would have their private property confiscated under eminent domain,¡± Paul said.

 

 

This prohibition of funds, if passed, would go a long way toward derailing this ill-conceived project and would send a clear message that further attempts to undermine U.S. sovereignty would not be unchallenged in Congress. It is long past time the United States House and Senate start taking our constitutional oversight roles seriously.¡± The Congressman concluded.

 

 

The initial Security and Prosperity Partnership agreement was signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005. It established working groups, under the North American Free Trade Agreement office.

 

 

Jerome Corsi brought attention to the SPP two years ago when he obtained SPP documents, under the freedom of information act, showing that a wide range of US administrative law is being re-written in stealth under a program to “integrate” and “harmonize” with administrative law in Mexico and Canada, just as has become commonplace within the EU.

 

 

The documents contained references to upwards of 13 working groups within an entire organized infrastructure that has drawn from officials within most areas of administrative government including U.S. departments of State, Homeland Security, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture, Transportation, Energy, Health and Human Services, and the office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

 

Related: Dear Deluded Mass Media, North American Union Agenda Exists

 

 Article provided by Connie Fogal/Canadian Action Party