06 20 19 The Long and Short of It the RFK Assassination Truth Reduced to Two Paragraphs:

A Nation Beguiled

By Anna Von Reitz

The Long and Short of It: the RFK Assassination Truth Reduced to Two Paragraphs:

“Unlike his assassinated brother, RFK received a first-class autopsy whose results are trustworthy. Renowned medical examiner Thomas Noguchi performed the autopsy. The autopsy report and Noguchi’s trial testimony reveal that (1) all three bullets striking RFK were fired from behind him, and (2) the three bullets had been fired at point-blank range—“[the] muzzle distance… was very, very close.” The fatal bullet was fired from a firearm “one inch from the edge of [RFK’s] right ear and three inches behind the head.”

Sirhan could not possibly have fired these three shots. He was in front of RFK and never came within 4 or 5 feet of him.”

Is that clear enough for everyone?

The DOJ was complicit. The FBI was complicit. The CIA was complicit. The LAPD was complicit. They all lied their rumps off.

I knew that on my 12th birthday, June 6, 1968. The first thing I heard that morning was the assassination of RFK, the last US Attorney General who actually tried to defend the American States and People.

Want to know the EXACT details? Read Lisa Pease’s new book, “A Lie Too Big to Fail”.

Want the abstract I quoted above? Go here:https://flagpole.com/news/news-features/2019/06/19/the-real-story-of-the-assassination-of-robert-f-kennedy

See this article and over 1800 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

LAPD moves to further restrict public oversight

 Janet C. Phelan 

____________________________________________

 The citation of the Kusar case could be seen as paving the way for the police to operate under a mantle of complete secrecy. One could easily project into a not-so-distant future where these two legal citations, in conjunction, could be used to create a modern day “Secret Police.”

_____________________________________________

In a startling reversal of an established transparency policy, the Los Angeles Police Department has refused a recent routine records request, citing a 1993 court case, County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (Kusar).

The Kusar case affirmed the public’s right to view contemporaneous records and the LAPD has cited this case in its refusal to release a record which is only nine months old. Coupled with the restrictions contained in Government Code 6254, which inhibits the disclosure of issues under investigation, the PD has effectively locked down information about any and all police records. 

The specific issue surrounds a request made by this reporter on March 9, 2011 for the report pertinent to the detention of a Los Angeles resident. Jeannie Tanaka was taken into custody on June 10, 2010 upon an allegation that she had violated a Restraining Order. Tanaka was apparently released prior to being booked, after the West Los Angeles  PD discovered that there was no Restraining Order in effect.