Just give up your guns, stupid!

Marti Oakley  ©copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved

Follow @MartiOakley

___________________________________________________________________

Note: **Might I suggest that those who are illegally seeking to obtain a firearm contact the ATF or Eric Holder? After Fast & Furious, obviously the biggest gun runners in the country are working for the federal government. Oh! excuse me……gun “walkers”

________________________________________________________________________

The push to “back door” the UN Small Arms Treaty

The push to establish an (inter-)national gun registry that would mirror the UN Small Arms Treaty requirements meant to prohibit, limit and eventually make gun ownership untenable, has failed to pass the senate. The anger from the Obama Administration is palpable. This was supposed to be a done deal and would have relieved the president from issuing a clearly unconstitutional executive order, which now he is most likely to do. This will be a direct assault on the 2nd Amendment in order to acquiesce to the United Nations demands that the citizens of the United States forfeit their 2nd Amendment protections and give up their guns. It is a demand that the federal corporation that operates as [government] sees as quite advantageous in their efforts to dispense with any notion of a constitutional republic.

Lame Street Media was simply abuzz with feigned angry indignation at the Senate for voting down what was clearly meant to be the door opener for future assaults on the 2nd Amendment.

An early morning show on MSNBC that we like to call “Morning Blow” was a prime example of LSM’s efforts to sway public opinion, to anger the public and to denigrate the Senate. Senators were called “stupid” for refusing to condone what everyone surely knew to be the opening volley against gun rights. At one point, the claim was made that 90% of the public supported these bills.

This is an outright lie.

These bills had nowhere near that amount of support, and in fact, the public was heavily against any such bills knowing full well that these bills had nothing to do with making us safer, keeping guns out of criminals hands or any other such drivel promoted by those who fear an armed public.

To hear these talking potato heads talk…you would think that there is not one state with waiting periods to clear back ground checks in existence and you would think that absolutely everyone out here is clamoring to have their 2nd Amendment rights struck down.

Another lie.

Most states have a minimum of three days before a gun sale can be completed and possession of the gun can occur, and gun shows do not necessarily equate to immediate possession. In fact, I know of no states that do not have a back ground check accompanied by a waiting period. But it is important to make the public think and believe that tens of thousands of guns are sold willy nilly with no record of sales, no back ground checks, no waiting periods.

Considering the massive amount of surveillance that has been conducted on the American public as a result of the Patriot Acts and subsequent bills which further encroached on our right to be left alone, and when you consider the fact that the CIA has been assembling dossiers on absolutely every one, the likely-hood that a criminal would obtain a gun through these resources is nill to none. Criminals will go to other criminals to buy guns, they will not go to legal gun owners who abide by the law.

Note: **Might I suggest that those who are illegally seeking to obtain a firearm contact the ATF or Eric Holder? After Fast & Furious, obviously the biggest gun runners in the country are working for the federal government. Oh! excuse me……gun “walkers”. If you supplied guns to the drug cartels in Mexico you would be a “gun-runner” and federally prosecuted. If THEY provide guns to the drug cartels it is gun”walking”….sounds much nicer and softer. YOU would be prosecuted but THEY just don’t remember anything so nothing happens.

Illegal Immigrants/Domestic Terrorists

IF you bother to read the “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007” (S. 1959) it becomes quite apparent that it is only American citizens who are the determined threat.  It is only legal and natural born citizens who are targeted in this unconstitutional, martial law enabling, piece of crap.  And how do I know this? 

On May 1, 2008 all across our nation, illegal immigrants gathered with co-conspirators and rallied, protested, demanded changes in our laws, rights that are not theirs, and to be allowed to enter as they please with any or all of their extended families in tow.  Not only that, we are expected to give them jobs that Americans desperately need, housing assistance, food assistance, free healthcare, free education and what ever else they decide they want simply by virtue of the fact they broke our laws and entered the country illegally.  According to S.1959……it is a felony to rally, to try and effect changes in political, social or religious areas…….so why was this May Day protest tolerated? 

It isn’t like no one knew about this protest rally.  It was advertised across the nation.  Everyone knew.  And here was an ideal situation for law enforcement and Immigration enforcement…….only none of them showed up.  No Senator or Representative appeared on the news and demanded that something be done…..not one spoke up and said “wait a minute……these people are here illegally and they don’t have rights…they broke our laws coming here and this shouldn’t be tolerated.”  Not one.

I liken this to bank robbers running an advertisement in all the cities where they intend to rob banks.  Something like this:

Attention:  We are bank robbers and we will be in (your city) on (date).  We intend to rob all of your banks at approximately 12p.m.  Please have all your money ready for easy pick up. Your cooperation is appreciated.  If we all work together these robberies will cause little disruption in your day. There is no need to notify law enforcement or federal authorities (even though this is a federal crime) they are ordered to appear to be “busy” elsewhere. 

I know this sounds ridiculous, and it is.  But it is no different than illegal immigrants protesting in our cities, on our streets, demanding not only citizenship but rights and benefits of this society and doing it with advance notice of where they will be and when.  So where was ICE?  Where was the AG Murkasey who is charged under US Code with defending and securing our borders against an influx of illegal aliens or mass migration into the country?  Who knows where they were…….but we sure know where they weren’t.  They weren’t at any of these rallys. 

But lets turn this around and look at it from another angle.  What happens if legal US citizens rally and protest government policies?  The police show up, people are herded into selected areas if not arrested.  We have to get permits, we have to set time limits, we have to abide by laws that were devised purely for the sake of stifling dissent and discouraging opposition to government policies.  WE are the domestic terrorists that the government needs to legislate into submission. 

The Democrats in Congress along with a few Republicans just to make it look good, have once again shown us that their loyalties, their allegiance, is not to the people of the United States.  If they just had to pass another law why wasn’t it one making protest rallys by illegal immigrants a felony?  Why is there not one representative or senator proposing an “Anti-Violent Immigration and Protection of the US from Illegal Immigrant Terrorism Act”?  And isn’t this what these protest rallys amount to under the current laws?  Aren’t these massive protests actually acts of terrorism against the people of the United States?  Where the hell is Chertof and his Homeland Security band of thieves and thugs when you need them?  Oh! I forgot……they are busy now trying to pass a REAL ID version of the Social Security card. 

Isn’t it strange?  The same government agencies that threaten us daily with another terrorist attack if we don’t surrender our rights and freedom, the same agencies and operatives who encourage us to spy on our neighbors, to report anything suspicious or anyone we think is acting suspiciously: the same government who has claimed to be so tough on homeland security and keeping us safe……..is the same government that went to lunch while illegal domestic terrorists rallied in our streets. 

So who is it our government is really working for?

Marti Oakley (c) 2008

 

Confronting My Representative

http://fallin.house.gov/contact.shtml

I just learned that my representative, Mary Fallin, whom I helped elect in 2006, was among those in the House who voted for the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act. So, I’ve just contacted her about it:

“Rep. Fallin, when I helped to elect you, I expected you to be faithful to your oath to uphold the constitution of the United States of America. Now, I learn that you were among those who voted in favor of the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007.

 

This act, if passed by the senate, will enable, not only the Bush administration, but any future administration to label any American citizen a “homegrown terrorist” or “enemy combatant” simply for holding or expressing beliefs the government deems to be included in the vague definitions this act constitutes as “homegrown terrorism.”

 

Especially troubling is the wording “use, planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence…”

 

 The way this is worded, it implies the government considers “force” to be something different and apart from “violence.”

 

As vague as this definition is, the President is given a virtual blank check in interpreting what he considers to be “force.” This can be construed to include “forcing” an issue before congress for debate, “forcing” the government to live up to the constitution, or speaking out against the government “forcefully,” for example.

 

Since the word “force” has been separated from the word “violence,” this implies that “force” needn’t be actual physical violence.

 

Even more threatening to our freedoms is the definition of “Ideologically Based Violence,” which extends this vague definition of “force” to include the political, religious or social beliefs of any individual or group.

 

In other words, Rep. Fallin, this act that you have voted for will make it possible for whomever is in charge of our government, either now or in the future, to selectively decide that some individuals’ or groups’ political, religious or social speech or activities, including their constitutionally protected free assembly and protest against our government, constitutes sufficient “force” to make said individuals or groups guilty of “ideologically based violence.”

 

I hope that you will reconsider your vote and appropriately act to stop this bill from being passed in the senate, as well. I know you have no jurisdiction in the senate and cannot vote on the bill again, but you do have the ability to influence your colleagues in the senate to refrain from passing this incredible infringement upon the rights and liberties of all Americans for generations to come.

Thank you for your patience and for reading this.”

 Gary