The plan for the end of Europe: the new USSR

The plan for the end of Europe: the new USSR

by Jon Rappoport

October 21, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

“If you controlled the meaning of The Good, and you had unlimited propaganda resources and access to the press, and if you also had control over the Armed Forces and the police, you could build a new society in short order. You could wreck centuries of tradition in a few decades. And if you had the education system in your back pocket, you could wipe out the memory of what formerly existed. No one would remember. No one would care. This is happening now, in Europe. Ignorance is enlightenment.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

One of the basic principles of elite Globalism is: the end of borders, the end of separate nations.

The European Union was built for this purpose, step by step, out of the ashes of World War 2: a super-bureaucracy and political management system for the whole continent.

But that was not enough. There had to be a way to wipe out separate and sovereign nations at ground level, to irrevocably change the landscape.

It is open borders; floods of immigrants; “replacement populations”; an influx of people who have no intention of accepting the customs and way of life in their new homes.

The end result? A de facto reconfiguring of national populations, so that, when you look at the makeup of Europe 20 years from now, you will say:

“Why do we think of Germany or France or England? They don’t really exist. All of Europe is a vast mix of immigrants. Europe is really one country now. So let’s erase all those old artificial borders.”

Eventually, even uttering words like “Swedes, Norwegians, Germans, French, Dutch…” will be considered micro (or macro) aggressions against the “people of Europe.”

Of course, in reaching this point, there will be a certain amount of chaos and violence. The EU is banking on its ability to control it, to put it down where necessary, and to maintain its hold as the one and only governing force in Europe.

On a cultural level, names like Locke, Shakespeare, Goethe, Mozart, Beethoven, Bach, Lorca, Goya, Cezanne, Monet, Van Gogh, Michelangelo, Rembrandt, Dante, Galileo, Faraday, and even “modern” names like Bartok, Stravinsky, Rimbaud, Orwell, and Camus will be vague dusty ghosts that provoke uncomprehending stares. “The past is dead.”

“Oh, but don’t worry about that. The important thing is, every person living in Europe is a citizen of Europe, and is entitled to benefits. This is humane, this is The Good, this is the triumph of the benevolent State. Nothing else matters.”

All European languages will eventually be reduced. Who has the right to speak words that the majority of people can’t understand?

What I’m sketching in here is the grid that will be laid over Europe.

And of course, as automation comes on with a rush, many “citizen-workers of Europe” will become unnecessary. Even great corporations will fall, because they won’t be able to sell their products to an impoverished population. They’ll hope against hope that the billions of people in the East, China and India, will give them new markets.

Against this background, the individual human being will be looked at, from the top, as a cipher, a unit in “models and algorithms.”

The question is, how many individuals will take the bait and regard themselves as mere “parts” in the overall system?

How many will give in and consider their future a function of how much they can obtain from The State, free of charge?

How many will come to believe that their power, as individuals, is inconsequential—or even a delusion?

Why do I bother bringing this up? Because, regardless of the prevailing collectivist mindset—propagandized and promoted and exploited from an elite level—State repression, in all its forms, falls on each individual.

If the very concept of the individual is wiped out, what is left?

In 1859, John Stuart Mill wrote: “If it were felt that the free development of individuality is one of the leading essentials of well-being…there would be no danger that liberty should be undervalued.”

Conversely, when the free development of individuality is of no concern, liberty will die.

Boris Pasternak, the Russian novelist and poet, who knew a thing or two about political repression, wrote (1960): “They [the Soviet bureaucrats] don’t ask much of you. They only want you to hate the things you love and to love the things you despise.”

This reversal is being imposed now, in Europe.

Defectors from the old USSR would recognize it in an instant, having lived through it themselves. The European version seems softer and gentler, but that is just a matter of strategy. The culture is being cooked more slowly.

But just because secret police aren’t knocking on doors in the middle of the night and making mass arrests, that isn’t a sign that individual freedom reigns.

A number of European political leaders are telling their constituencies, “You have no right to oppose the flood of immigration on any grounds. To do so, to utter such public statements, is an offense.”

Does that sound familiar?

The wet dream of every collectivist is coming true. All power at the top; all conformity (called “unity”) everywhere else. The new USSR.

In the old days, the East German police kept records on every citizen and blanketed the population with snitches and spies. The modern Surveillance State has replaced that, searching for “nodes of discontent.”

Collectivists may pay lip service to the dangers of State surveillance, but when it is used to root out people who can’t envision a better world based on, among other features, open borders, well, this is just an enforcement of The Good upon those who can’t discover it for themselves.

If The Humanitarian Way needs a nudge and boost, why not?

For dyed-in-the-wool collectivists, freedom isn’t just a roadblock; it’s an irrelevant illusion. It never existed. All humans are operating according to programs, and have been since birth. Therefore, install a better program, by any means necessary and available. Produce “kinder people.”

This is both a political and a technological imperative.

Open borders and unlimited immigration is a good test case. For people who feel imposed upon, who feel their communities are being torn apart, who feel personally threatened, who feel this is, indeed, a covert operation to transform Europe into a new USSR, there is a need for re-education at the deepest level possible. Because, surely, such people are suffering from profound disorders. Their circuits are crossed. Their brains are defective. They can’t see the larger picture.

They would never be able to see, for example, the wisdom of the words of Zbigniew Brzezinski, David Rockerfeller’s alter ego, who wrote, in 1969:

“The nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.”

Here is the Globalist tactician at work, a man who seems to hate the old USSR, but is seeking to install a version of the same collectivism, through other means.

If Lenin were alive today, he would look out over Europe and agree that his agenda is alive and well. He might object to the relatively slow pace. He might want more violence. But he would grudgingly acknowledge that his descendants have discovered a few new tricks.

He would have to approve of the “humanitarian altruism,” and the way it is being modeled and manipulated, so that the edifice of The Good appears as a shining beacon in the darkness.

Nice movie. Excellent production design. Tears of sympathy rolling down the cheeks of the audience.

Minds reduced to one constant: we must care for the less fortunate.

Trillions and trillions of dollars devoted to elicit that sentiment, regardless of the circumstances, or the true malignant outcome, or the actual sinister intent of the elite artists of reality.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Jon Rappoport | October 21, 2015 at 9:28 am | Categories: Bordergate, Globalist | URL: http://wp.me/pFTDT-3fk

The Incredible Shrinking Book Market and Its Implications for Freedom of Information

I was just watching a discussion between independent book publishers on C-SPAN 2 Book TV this morning, which was originally recorded March 20^th, 2008. First of all, I feel the need to point out that these “independent” book publishers may be thinking of themselves in rather anachronistic terms as “independents” in relation to the larger publishing houses of New York, where the meeting took place (in Brooklyn) and have not considered that truly “independent” book publishing, these days, is being done by the authors, themselves. So, what this handful of “independents” really are is small press book publishers.

That distinction aside, the main thing that struck me about this discussion was the mention of the March 20^th, 2008 extinction of Borders Books stores and its implications for the future of the book industry, as well as for the range of choice of readers.

There was some speculation as to whether or not Borders would then be absorbed by Barnes & Noble, the largest book seller chain in the world and, it would seem that’s probably going to be the case. One of the speakers said that, at one time, New York City used to have over 300 book stores and that now it has only 30. I thought about this for a moment and realized that, here is a city of 8 million or so people, also, the city with the largest number of book publishers in the world, and yet, it only has about 30 book stores, whereas, I live in Oklahoma City, which claims a metro area population of around one million and yet, I know of at least 15 book stores just within the northwest quadrant of Oklahoma City and, I’m certain there are many I’ve overlooked. This includes the chain stores as well as the independent “mom & pop” stores, what few still exist. This is quite a contrast to New York, which is billed as the literary capital of the world, while Oklahoma City is popularly denigrated as a backward “small town” full of illiterate hicks.

Aside from these contrasts between my city and New York, the broader discussion also mentioned that there has been an amazing contraction and consolidation of the book publishing industry and I believe this is due, in no small part, to the advent of the internet, which is supplanting both books and magazines, as well as television, among most Americans. I know that, personally, I now get most of my news from the internet instead of television and most of my reading is done online instead of in books and magazines. This appears to be the way things are headed and, with so many people waking up to the mainstream mass media’s domination by corporatist interests, this is no surprise.

The globalist trend toward consolidation has affected not only manufacturing and retailing, but has, also, affected mass communications. Despite the fact there are now more television channels than ever before in the history of the medium, it remains the case that the medium, itself, has been dominated and controlled by the global elite from its very birth as an instrument of propaganda and mind control. Thus, the popular illusion that the choice of information outlets on television has expanded greatly is a myth. While the number of channels may have increased, they are all saying the same thing and disseminating the same propaganda, as usual.

So, too, is the book publishing industry, and one needn’t look any farther than their nearest Barnes & Noble store to see this. The next time you find yourself there, take a good look at the titles in the “Current Affairs” section and you will see that most of the books there are either touting the neoconservative or the neoliberal worldview – in other words, the same thing, thinly (and falsely) disguised as opposing viewpoints, though they are not. Aside from a few (very few) books by David Ray Griffin and maybe one or two others, you will find little there that says 9/11 was an inside job and, aside from these, you will find absolutely nothing that exposes the New World Order for what it is or raises any questions about PNAC and the true neocon agenda to create a global police state. For that kind of reading material in a “brick and mortar” book store, you’ll have to find a truly independent “mom & pop” store, such as Austin, Texas’ Brave New Books, or one of the John Birch Society’s American Opinion bookstores, like the one we have here. Other than this, your only outlet for finding the truth in print media is to be found online.