by: Paul Griepentrog ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Copyright (c) 2009 
Foreword: An announcement was posted yesterday by Judith McGeary of Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund (FTCLDF) saying that FTCLDF had filed an Amicus brief in the Emmanuel Miller Case. Below is the actual and original AMICUS filed by Paul Griepentrog in December of 2008 on behalf of Emmanuel Miller. Mr. Griepentrog can supply copies of original documents showing notary, certification, court time/date stamp and fees paid. Why would FTCLDF file, or claim to have filed, an AMICUS brief when they have steadfastly refused to enter into, appear on behalf of, or show any interest in these prosecutions prior to this? Contact: Paul Griepentrog at skfarms@centurytel.net to request copies of the original documents showing certification and acceptance.
This post includes these documents:
INTERVENER TO FILE BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT
-
VERIFICATION OF THE ADMISSION OF FACTS BY THE PARTIES
-
NOTICE OF ACTIVATION OF ESTOPEL
-
ADMISSION TO INQUIRIES
-
VERIFICATION OF THE ADMISSION OF FACTS BY THE PARTIES
-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
____________________________________________
Where did these people come from?
There are 22 groups listed below that have signed on an amicus brief that alleges to support Emanuel Miller. This brief advocates a voluntary premises registration program in Wisconsin. In as much as it was the intent of the legislature that participation be voluntary when the existing legislation was passed we can only assume these groups wish to further the suffering we now endure. This brief is of no benefit to those of us here. The religious convictions of Mr. Miller were established at trial and have no need of reiteration. Nor do any of us here wish to endure any form of premises registration, having faced the persecution of an overzealous Agriculture Department that refused to allow any exemptions despite the intent of the legislature.
We find the only in state group signed on to this is the Family Farm Defenders who in a quest to further their own groups funds by selling toasted cheese sandwiches at an event by Michael Pollan in Madison and completely forgot Emanuel Miller’s Trial. This group opposed supporting our lobbying efforts for Scott Suder’s bill.
We find R-CALF USA who having been apprised of the situation for over a year in reports I gave to the Animal ID Committee on a monthly basis, now in violation of their own policy which states they are opposed to all forms of NAIS. When I went to them wanting an alert when Pat and Melissa were charged my pleas fell on deaf ears, only a week before the trial did they finally put out an alert, despite their claims that this was not a national issue.
Where are those claims now when these out of state national groups seek to interfere and counter the work that is being done here?
We seek to overturn the statute and end this nightmare, but the groups listed below want this to continue. Not one of them I contacted had read the brief or contacted the only group here actively involved in supporting those facing prosecution, the Wisconsin Independent Consumers and Farmers Association (WICFA).
There were no representatives at either trial from any of these groups, a true reflection of their concern. This act on their part is to derail our efforts to have the enabling legislation declared null and void and free ourselves completely from this burden. Voluntary is not acceptable to us and would be as a snake coiled in the corner ready to strike again.
In the words of Emanuel Miller “On this there can be no compromise.” More
The PPJ Gazette 
