When I first saw chemtrails with my own eyes, in January 2008, it was after some nine months of having researched the subject, seeing hundreds of videos and still images by others, some of them proving the existence of chemtrails in the 1990s. So I knew that, even though I had never seen them then, millions of others had.
This prompted me to conclude that there must be some form of mass-electromagnetic mind control at work, which prevents most people from even seeing them, let alone realizing what they are. I had no other means of explaining how I could have sworn they were never there before and that I had seen normal skies for most of my life, until 2008.
Recently, this nagging question has prompted me to actively seek out photographic evidence of chemtrails in past decades. The earliest year I had been able to document chemtrails in, some months ago, was 1992, as revealed by a brief glimpse of a single chemtrail in a scene from the movie “White Sands,” starring Willem Dafoe and Mickey Rourke.
Then, only weeks ago, I stumbled upon a chemtrail sky in a 1985 music video by Simple Minds, for their release of the song “Alive and Kicking.”
Just when I was about to conclude that I could probably not find anything earlier, I had the earliest, yet, drop into my lap when I wasn’t even looking for it. I was watching the 1971 Steven Spielberg movie, “Duel,” which I’d seen many times before, when, all of a sudden, there was Dennis Weaver against a chemtrail sky.
What I find even more striking about these scenes is that the shots are predominately low-angle shots that are deliberately composed so as to take in large expanses of the sky. This didn’t happen by accident, folks. Hollywood movies are shot from storyboards and locations for outdoor shooting are selected well in advance and a typical location shoot can take quite a while to set up for. Given this, it is glaringly apparent that Spielberg and crew not only had foreknowledge of the chemtrail spraying, but were there when it occurred, probably not more than two hours prior to the shooting of these scenes, judging by how much the trails have been blown by the wind.
How To Bust Chemtrails | Brandsgoods
May 27, 2016 @ 00:24:21
Thomas Fessler
Mar 24, 2016 @ 16:35:04
I didn’t see chemtrails – only cirrus clouds
LikeLike
Anonymous
Oct 18, 2014 @ 02:09:33
Check out the 1970 film Patton. You’ll see distinct chemtrails in shots of France.
LikeLike
google
Aug 02, 2014 @ 11:07:40
It’s really a nice and useful piece of info.
I am glad that you shared this helpful info with us.
Please stay us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLike
bruce
Jul 13, 2014 @ 14:38:35
heres my theory on chemtrails. organite contains aluminium. much of our town water here in Australia has fluoride added to it. fluoride causes the human body to absorb the aluminium. this in turn affects the brain makes people docile stunts brain development and is linked to dementia.
LikeLike
Jim
May 25, 2014 @ 00:49:08
I happened to be watching Rocky 2 this weekend and couldn’t believe what I saw. When he first starts training after seeing his baby for the first time, there are chem trails in the sky. I took a pic of the scene on the tv. It’s surreal but they look like two chem trails in the sky.
LikeLike
Anonymous
Dec 08, 2013 @ 02:20:32
I was wondering if anyone has ever sued or heard of anyone suing the fed gov for chemtrail poisoning? I think this is the reason for my illnesses.I am angry, I blame them for the dulling of my mind. When I was a kid I was told I had the memory of an elephant, now I have a hard time remembering how to do math. I can’t even help my middle schooler with homework
LikeLike
Heather
Nov 12, 2013 @ 06:00:44
Oh, and not to mention my whole town is covered in spider webs (with no spiders in sight), literally.
LikeLike
Heather
Nov 12, 2013 @ 05:58:49
Chemtrails have been around for quite sometime, but not as widespread and frequent as they are now. They would only do them every once in a while.back then because they were still in the experimental stage of things. That’s why you may have read reports about people dying from them and them leaving black goo all over people’s houses. They’ve “perfected” them now, so they can spray them every day without people having proof on the ground. Even though where I live, in Phoenix, there are days where it looks like it’s snowing (in 100 degree weather) from all the white fallout.
LikeLike
panquakemix
Oct 30, 2013 @ 23:14:58
That was added later just like the ones in Billy Jack.
LikeLike
jamasa
Jan 19, 2013 @ 12:42:08
Dear Gary – People ARE seeing chemtrails, they’re just not noticing them. A bit like the frog not noticing he’s being boiled because the temperature increase is so gradual. It certainly doesn’t follow that ‘not seeing’ them is down to ‘mass-electromagnetic mind control’ – from what you’ve said.
There have been jet trails since the late 20’s & the one in the ‘Tara’ scene in the middle of ‘Gone with The Wind’ (1939) looks very much like a ‘chemtrail’ to me. Can’t really be sure though. There are a plethora of early films showing trails such as in Duel – I see them all the time. I doubt that they’d have had to go to so much trouble to contrive the timing in Duel – just to get the chemtrail shot since they were more or less ubiquitous then anyway. It’s certainly not ‘glaringly apparant’ that they did – as you say.
Please guys & girls let’s not be so quick to jump to conclusions. It only muddies the cause. Let’s just pose the questions until the evidence is clear.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Apr 01, 2012 @ 17:45:28
Agreed, Sven, these chemtrails are not jet fuel exhaust, but rather, are released from compressed canisters aboard the plane, which has, as you suggest, a computer-operated valve system, whereby a pilot or other on-board personnel, can turn the valves on and off at will, and this is what we are seeing in many cases, these days, in which trails start and stop, in dashed lines, almost like Morse Code. When I see these, it’s fun to point at them and say to someone, “Hey, I wonder if that plane was having engine trouble? What do you think, eh?” Sometimes, it’s more fun to say, “Hey, look at that! Passengers must have got on and off the plane as it flew!” 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
sven
Apr 01, 2012 @ 08:10:29
I can remember the contrails as a kid, looking up at the sky watching the planes fly over leaving a trail and then disappearing after a few seconds; now what we get is the CHEMTRAILS spreading out creating total coverage. I have personaly seen three planes in very close proximity, the first plane leaving a chemtrail the middle plane not leaving any trail (chemtrail or contrail) and the third leaving a trail, these planes were flying through the same airspace. I would suggest that the sysem for controlling the planes is contained within the computer systems/software put in place by LOCKHEAD MARTIN
http://www.lockheedmartin.co.uk/us/news/press-releases/2003/january/LOCKHEEDMARTINAWARDEDCONTRACTSUPPOR.html .
Quote “The ASOC system produces real-time recognized air pictures integrating military and civilian airspace information compatible with western European and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) standards. Making effective use of commercial components,”
I would also add that here in the uk, about the time of the increase in chemtrails/geo-engineering, tv weather news stopped using ‘fluffy’ cloud icons and started using ‘wispy’ ones instead.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gary Rea
Jan 07, 2012 @ 17:42:55
Well, Rabbi, I see it, alright, but the only thing that looks added is the Hulk. The footage from the unaltered “Duel,” on the other hand, proves the presence of chemtrails in at least 1971, and if you watch this clip from Michael Wadliegh’s 1969 documentary of “Woodstock,” there seems to have been sightings of chemtrails then, also:
So, yes, there certainly were chemtrails prior to 1982, as I’ve shown above. As I said in the article, I don’t recall seeing them then, either, but then, as I also said, I don’t recall seeing them prior to January 2008 – yet I KNOW they existed prior to then, not only from the testimony of millions of people around the world, but from photographs and video footage from the nineties. So, it is entirely possible to have not seen what was there, and I believe there is some form of electromagnetic mind control at work on the world’s population, at large, that somehow prevents our witnessing these trails. The “antidote” to that conditioning, which is weak, apparently, seems to be education. I only saw chemtrails after spending months looking at photographs and videos of them and reading about them.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mindcon26.htm
LikeLike
Rabbi TavRAbbi Tav
Jan 06, 2012 @ 20:16:16
Check YouTube “Duel Alternative Ending” and at 0.45 there is one fat chemtrail in the splice with the Hulk footage from 1978-82. So is this proof of actual chemtrails in 82 or earlier? Or was it added?
I sure don’t remember seeing them in the 70’s but noticed a huge deterioration in the UK weather starting late 2005.
LikeLike
Heavy Chemtrail Activity off California Coast on July 21, 2011 « News Worldwide
Jul 26, 2011 @ 11:01:11
Gary Rea
Jun 15, 2011 @ 01:46:32
Thanks for the detailed report, Ray!
LikeLike
Ray
Jun 14, 2011 @ 22:51:11
Inside Out – East: Monday November 6, 2006
http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/east/series10/week9_spraying_war_extra.shtml
Insider account – clouds of secrecy
Uncovering hidden secrets – Mike Kenner
Between 1953 and 1964 top secret trials were carried out using a chemical concoction of zinc cadmium sulphide to simulate how a cloud would disperse biological agents.
The unsuspecting population in the East of England was sprayed covertly with the poisonous compound at least 76 times.
Mike Kenner is an “Open Government Campaigner” who stumbled across the Norwich and Bedford trials, and whose revelations prompted two Government Inquiries.
This article by Mike Kenner describes how he uncovered the story using files obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.
Investigating the trials
“During November 1998, the Sunday Telegraph published an exclusive article by Rob Evans and Andrew Gilligan.
“It revealed that scientists from the Chemical Defence Experimental Establishment (CDEE), Porton Down, had in the past, sprayed large parts of the UK with a toxic chemical compound – Zinc Cadmium sulphide (ZnCds). “Initially, it was thought that 12 large-scale experiments had been conducted by CDEE scientists. My investigations soon revealed that this figure was a vast underestimation…”
Mike Kenner
“At the time of the article, I was already involved, as an Open Government campaigner, in calling for the Ministry of Defence to release more information concerning the 1963-1975 Porton Down public area Biological Warfare experiments, which had been conducted in my local area – South Dorset.
“After pressure from various MPs and concerned residents, the MOD eventually announced that they would commission yet another Independent Review, which would investigate possible adverse health effects caused by the public area ZnCds tests.
“This was the second Independent Review to be commissioned by the MOD during the late 1990s.
“The first review, conducted by Professor Brian Spratt FRS, investigated any possible adverse health effects experienced by the residents of southern England who were exposed to the massive aerosols of live bacteria, emitted during the Porton Down Dorset Defence Trials.”
Opening up the files
“During the following years, I used Open Government legislation, such as the Code of Practice for Access to Government Information, in order to obtain more information about the ZnCds field trials.
“Initially, it was thought that 12 large-scale experiments had been conducted by CDEE scientists.
Casting new light – recently released files on spraying
“My investigations soon revealed that this figure was a vast underestimation of the true figure.
“By the time that the Academy of Medical Sciences had been appointed to conduct their Independent Review (late 1999), the number of known experiments had risen to circa 70.
“Fortunately, examination of each newly declassified Porton scientific report revealed evidence of yet more ,as yet unknown, ZnCds field trials.
“Again, I would make a Code of Practice request to Porton Down and once again more information would be released.
“By now, the tally of known public area ZnCds experiments had risen to nearly 100.”
Open air spraying
“During the course of my investigations I inadvertently stumbled across a cache of papers relating to trials which took place over Norfolk in 1963 and again in 1964.
“These trials turned out to be the last in this open-air spraying programme and were themselves unique because they involved the Home Office and the City of Norwich Police.
“On occasion, this newly declassified material has revealed information which contradicts that which is contained in the independent review.
Clouds of secrecy – Inside Out investigates
“On at least two occasions, official Porton Down scientific reports have been discovered which were not even examined by the review.
“The first (Porton Technical Paper No 794) detailed a number of experiments where radioactive gas and ZnCds particles were released from AERE Harwell and were tracked for at least 60 kilometres downwind.
“The second (Porton Technical Paper No 885), detailed the numerous (circa 36) ZnCds field trials that were conducted by Porton Down scientists at Cardington, Bedfordshire, during 1963.
“Even more importantly, PTP No 885 revealed that the chemical compound used in the 1963 Cardington field trials (ZnCds) was sprayed by Porton scientists from a moving vehicle.
“This would have placed local Bedfordshire residents in much closer proximity to the source of sprayed ZnCds than previous trials, which had sprayed the ZnCds from an aircraft.
“Spraying this material from ground level could have led to a much higher received dosage of inhaled ZnCds amongst residents living close to the route of the Porton spray vehicle.
“The fact that such a large number of potentially hazardous field trials could be overlooked by a Government appointed Independent Review, and only be discovered by an ordinary resident using Open Government legislation, proves to me the true worth of the Freedom of Information Act.”
Mike Kenner
Clouds of secrecy pt 1 here
LikeLike
Gare
Jun 14, 2011 @ 00:36:45
Gary until You’ve combined the materials and gifted the orgonite to sources of DOR, You have not properly investigated anything… Reich was probably the smartest Human ever …
why would THEY burn His books? could there have been something in there that THEY did not want Us to read?
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 13, 2011 @ 23:44:31
Gare, I HAVE investigated it and I’ve concluded it’s nothing more than pseudo-science. It was adjudged as such when Reich first mentioned it, as well. As for what you’re “doing about it,” I can’t imagine that would amount to very much, as there is no evidence of any causal relationship between “Orgonite” and anything in the atmosphere. Cite one credible scientific paper or one study that shows otherwise. Show me one video that conclusively shows it working.
LikeLike
Gare
Jun 13, 2011 @ 23:06:55
yes Eric THEY are active in suppressing Orgonite’s abilities to defeat THEIR CHEMTRAIL areial assault of the entire planet. I remember reading about the Orgonite Gifters problems in spain many mnths ago on ethericwarriors.com… has there been more problems in the last month?
Gary Rea has decided unilaterally that “Orgonite” is not real and has no interest in investigating it for HimSelf to find out different …. luckily many many thousands of Us around the world have and are doing something about it 😉
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 13, 2011 @ 21:49:12
Well, Eric, I wouldn’t point to Reich’s collaboration with Einstein as a positive thing, as Einstein was a change agent; one of many who subverted man’s knowledge and understanding of science. Those who have followed him, including Michio Kaku, are there to dumb down the population, to confuse the public and obfuscate the facts about the universe we live in.
As for “Orgone,” I haven’t found a credible explanation of exactly what it IS, let alone how it supposedly works.
LikeLike
eric
Jun 13, 2011 @ 21:04:57
To gary rea – I had same reaction about orgone, cause i never find any serious scientific explanation, but 3 things are interrogatives:
1) Albert einstein began to colaborate with Wilhelm Reich
2) the most important active person about orgone system, puting reguraly around telehone ?s antens, had been arrested 1 month ago.
3) a new program in my region in spain is; black american helicopters without matricule are passing every 3/4 days following the way where are telephon antens.
What to think about the prohibition to put orgone near phone antens in Spain?
LikeLike
jackrabbit
Jun 11, 2011 @ 17:23:27
http://americansjourney.blogspot.com/search?q=contrails
http://americansjourney.blogspot.com/2010/05/aerosol-crimes-aka-chemtrails.html
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 11, 2011 @ 16:08:15
Interesting, Pockita. Could be there is something like that included. They may also vary the content of the aerosol for different effects in different regions. Still, I tend to think weather modification is only a small part of it, as well as the current cover story (now that they are admitting it exists, after years of denials).
LikeLike
pockita
Jun 11, 2011 @ 11:04:29
In my area (So. Calif.) chemtrails most often appear 1-3 days prior to the arrival of weather systems (i.e., clouds). When there are no or few clouds for extended periods we tend to have no chemtrails until just before the arrival of cloud systems regardless of any precipitation. The chemtrails then continue until 1-2 days after the weather clears. This is not always true but seems to often be true. I suspect that what is being sprayed, in part, are desiccants that absorb moisture (as from clouds, rain, etc). The reason being to cause drought for the coming “water crisis” in which there will be a great shortage of water. There are likely other reasons for the chemtrails as well — this is just an observation and conjecture on one possible reason.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 11, 2011 @ 06:58:37
Well, Gare, I really have no interest in it. I’m not interested in things I don’t believe are real.
LikeLike
Gare
Jun 11, 2011 @ 00:36:15
perhaps the only Person who could of explained how Orgone energy is generated by combining inorganic(metal) materials and organic(resin) was Wilhelm Reicht but He was murdered in 1957 the night before He was to be released from that lewisburg insane assylum 😦
I think the only way Your going to get Your answer Gary is to do as I suggested and make some Orgonite and bust up the DOR sources in Your town! unless of course Your just an armchair guy with a keyboard keeping those of Us occupied who otherwise would be doing the gifting work… off to toss some Orgonite tower busters into a new ungifted lake…
btw tossing Orgonite into water yields amazing confirmations in the form of blue holes, abundant Sylphs visible in the skies transmuting the CHEMTRAILS and of course abundant rain and snow 😉
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 11, 2011 @ 00:06:29
Gare, “belief” has nothing to do with it. Truth consists of facts, not beliefs. Again, what is the causal factor? What is it about “a few gallons of resin , metal shavings and a some small chunks of quartz” that could possibly “generate” anything at all (except a mess?), let alone create a force that move clouds and chemtrails? I keep asking the people who say they believe in Orgone blasters, but they never say anything except that they believe it works. How do you KNOW it works? What evidence do you have that it works? Indeed, how CAN it work? What is the means by which it would do so?
LikeLike
Gare
Jun 10, 2011 @ 18:02:10
what I like best is that Orgonite works whether You believe in it or not.. why don’t You get a few gallons of resin , metal shavings and a some small chunks of quartz Gary and gift all the TOWERS around Your area and other weather weaponary ie: weather balls etc(big golf ball looking thing probably in Your airport compound)
another proof to Me is to place alot of orgonite on top Your freezer and grow some ice stalagmites out of Your ice cube trays that are half full of distilled water
the most active orgonite warriors post on http://www.ethericwarriors.com
when I started gifting Orgonite 9 yrs ago in regina We were under drought but not anymore…. abundant rain and snow ever since the initial gifting….
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 10, 2011 @ 13:22:10
Well, Gare, I’ve read about about Reich’s experiments and claims, and I’m aware that a lot of people, like yourself, seem to believe in this, but, I don’t see how Orgone can be effective at anything. What is the causal factor? How does an empty tube “generate” anything, much less a force capable of moving clouds and chemtrails? Until I’ve seen it demonstrated consistently, with my own eyes, I remain a skeptic.
LikeLike
gare
Jun 10, 2011 @ 04:03:46
becoming aware of CHEMTRAILS is only the beggining, Orgonite transmutes CHEMTRAILS into Orgone energy = blue skies = abundant rainfall…
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 09, 2011 @ 21:27:27
Thanks, Pockita. Getting blitzed today! They’re all over. Yes, I’ve noticed that some days there are none and, also, I have observed the peak season seems to be winter. It tends to taper off a little the rest of the year. My guess is that, the colder and more dense the air, the better for keeping the particulates aloft longer. The brainwashed usually won’t see them or know what we’re talking about, in the first place. Today, I saw some really obvious, wild looking trails, as I was driving, and I thought, how can anyone not see that, let alone think it’s “normal?” Sometimes, when I’m outside near someone and I see a chemtrail, I’ll point to it and say, “Hey, what’s that?!” Usually, I get these blank stares and “What?”
LikeLike
pockita
Jun 09, 2011 @ 21:09:10
Thanks, Gary. By the way, I enjoyed your article and think it is an important subject.
I first recall seeing “live” chemtrails about 1994-5. At that time I worked in an office on the 20th floor of a building in southern california with a huge window that had an unobstructed view of the sky so it was easy to see.
One question that I have found can jog the awareness of some people (if the subject comes up) is to ask them why they think chemtrails aren’t visible every day. That is, why do we only see them on some days and not others? If the trails are simply harmless, normal contrails does that mean that airplanes only fly on certain days and not others?
Of course, the severely brainwashed will come up with some sort of illogical answer for this but those who are a bit more aware may have a hard time answering the question which can result in the “wheels of awareness” being set in motion.
LikeLike
Joe
Jun 09, 2011 @ 02:55:32
Hey Gary,
I’m totally on board with the whole chemtrail thing. I consider myself somewhat of an expert. I’ve been aware of chemtrails since about 1996. I read alot about them but was a doubter for many years.
I’ve been a sky-watcher all my life. I’m 49. When I was a child, I’d always watch jets as they’d trace their con-trails across the sky and think “Wouldn’t it be neat if the contrails would stay and leave a permanent trail.” Of course, back then, I didn’t know they were called con-trails, condensation trails. And I never dreamed I’d live in a world where the trails did stay.
I remember in the late 60’s and all through the 70’s and into the 80’s where you’d get a high pressure weather system that would last for four or five days or a week or more where you’d have nothing but clear blue skies. Now, that might last 5 to 8 hours before the spraying turns the sky a pale yellow.
Personally, what I believe the trails to be is one (or perhaps all) of the following:
1) Weather modification perhaps conducted by the military to control weather systems causing drought, or severe storms in targeted areas.
2) An effort to make the atmosphere more conductive for micro-wave cell communications, and general surveillance. Also for enhanced military ability to be able to see over the horizon more efficiently.
3) A way to introduce biological agents into the environment for biological warfare purposes.
4) A way to ameliorate the effects of global warming by reflecting sunlight back out into space. (That’s funny!)
5) HAARP. The Hyper Auroral Research Project. Creating an enhanced medium (the atmosphere) in order to create earthquakes, hurricanes, tsunamis in targeted areas.
Which brings me to my pet theory that the whole ruse of climate change, or global warming is simply a cover for the strange weather we are and will experience as a result of this spraying.
Of extreme concern, which just highlights the complicity of the media in this (dare I say) conspiracy, is the total lack of attention that this whole thing generates. We are in the west, the most totally propagandized and brainwashed mass of people in the history of the world. These chemtrails are clearly different than contrails and I can’t believe that people who can remember and compare skies from earlier decades aren’t demanding that this spraying be stopped. It’s going to take a violent revolution I’m afraid…But society these days doesn’t want to know.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 09, 2011 @ 01:08:09
True, Pockita. I agree that, no matter what the evidence, or how much of it exists, they can still get away with hiding the truth in plain sight.
Meanwhile, I’ll see if I can get a copy of “Joe Kidd” and check it out. Maybe that will be my next article. 😉
LikeLike
pockita
Jun 09, 2011 @ 00:11:52
Gary you completely misunderstood my earlier post. Read it again please. Of course it would be absurd to gather up and doctor all those ALREADY RELEASED copies. It would only be necessary to change the NEW editions. The reason why is given in that post.
LikeLike
pockita
Jun 09, 2011 @ 00:05:48
Funny thing — I happen to watch the 1972 Eastwood western movie “Joe Kidd” this afternoon on TCM I think. About 45 minutes into it there is a lengthy scene of Robert Duvall
against the sky as background and what appears to be a long chemtrail behind him going completely across the screen. The shot is from a low angle and it appears the director intentionally wanted to show that chemtrail. Odd that it would be in a western set in the late 1800s however.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 08, 2011 @ 23:00:35
Seumas, did you even click on the link to the information about “Major Electromagnetic Mind Control Projects?” I guess the same thing keeping people from seeing chemtrails also keeps them from seeing hyperlinks in an article. Or, maybe it’s just that WordPress displays hyperlinks in a non-standard manner, these days, as a dotted underline, instead of the usual solid underline. In either case, here is the link:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mindcon26.htm
Note that electromagnetic mind control has existed since at least 1952. Like I said, earlier, I deal in facts. My view is that one should acknowledge the facts, whatever they may be. He who cherrypicks the facts and ignores those he’s uncomfortable with does himself a disservice.
LikeLike
Shirley
Jun 08, 2011 @ 17:27:45
It does not matter when the Chemtrails started appearing in movies because the ones laying the Chemtrails have been here probably before we were. When I have pointed out to ones who should know better that Chemtrails are not Contrails they look at me as if I am crazy. Humanity has been programmed to accept the media view of life as the authority on everything or as the norm. The real truth is not acceptable to programmed ones or if it is not politically correct it does not exist just like a head shrink automically proclaims patients who tell them they see paranormal beings or were abducted as mentally ill. People want to believe the Chemtrails streaks are Contrails because they fear the truth more.
If there were Chemtrails in older movies it was rare. The more prevelant Chemtrails started occuring in the last years. They are in the video promoting Utah as a place to visit and I see them on the evening news in the videos. Weather forecasters used to refer to a sky filled with Chemtrails over Arizona as low flying clouds. What is really important is people are starting to wake up and pay attention. The internet is a good thing because finally we can get information that has not been edited by politically correct authors. We need to know who is laying the Chemtrails and I do not believe it our Government simply because our Govenment would not be allowed to spray other countries without the planes being shot down. If you think logically you would know if all Governments all over the world were spraying the Chemtrails someone would have talked by now. It has to be a controlling outside source like I have said, my abductors.
LikeLike
Seumas
Jun 08, 2011 @ 16:47:49
Let me say sir, I appreciate your contributions to research of these matters. Although personally, I doubt that it’s elctromagnetic spectrum-based mind control, for the simple reason that tricking people into ignoring what they see is far simpler than that, evil doesn’t like to exert too much effort, if it can be helped, in it’s endeavors. For all those claiming the trails are added in later, and those holding the position they were there in originals, I propose that both sides are correct to an extent, the trails have been occuring since before I was born (early 80’s), and I know they also add in things on the sly in films, it’s simply to litmus test how programmed they have the public and for bragging rights, IE “Look we even added in digital trails and only those fringe looneys bothered to see, while the rest of the population completely ignored them, look how well trained they are!” On a personal note, though, I recall there being trails in the sky, and usually being told they are contrails or clouds, as far back as 2nd and 3rd grades.
Now the reason I doubt electromagnetic spectrum control is, of course, when pointed out, the trails are clearly there even to normal folks’ eyes, at least in my experience, when I’ve pointed such things out. This may be different in areas with higher concentrations of cell towers and other EM pollution. It would be interesting to remove such things from service and see what changes can be observed in the area immediately and over a longer peroid, not that they would allow a tower to be out of service for long of course. Further, may I suggest that readers of this invest in high powered optics such as telescopes and binocs, without electronic enhancements of course, and observe the skies? I’ve seen the planes make their trails visibly, but they fly considerably higher than passenger planes, so they are much harder to visually identify. Such a shame someone doesn’t up and declare their property a no-fly zone, and that anything flying over will be met as a declaration of war, that would be interesting to see if they would be stomped out or not, as a side note the planes are reportedly KC-10 aircraft, but I don’t know for sure if that is the *only* plane in service for the spraying.
Lastly, try to get old fashioned birder’s cameras to capture these things with, instead of using cell phones or digital cameras or other garbage that takes in the minimal amount of information possible with the lowest possible quality, and yes you can combine cameras with telescopes etc. and since they lack “digital” auto-focus and correct etc. they’ll just take a picutre of what’s seen through the ‘scope, without trying to “correct” it. Anyway long story short, the public is trained to never look at the sky and to completely ignore it, how or when they are trained with this behavior, though, I do not know. The sky creates inspiration, inspiration is dangerous, inspiration causes thought and thought, of course, is criminal. So they bleach the blue sky with spray, and by night blot out the stars with light pollution.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 08, 2011 @ 16:14:05
Pockita, as I explained yesterday, it would be literally impossible to add chemtrails to every existing copy, in all formats, of a movie released originally forty years ago. This would entail a massive undertaking involving millions of burglaries of private homes, etc, just to gain access to the hundreds of thousands of copies of the film that have been made over the years, let alone to digitally alter all of them. What you’re proposing is more absurd than the idea that chemtrail spraying has existed since the sixties.
As a few here have pointed out, yes, there are current digital manipulations going on in TV broadcasts, these days, but this doesn’t explain the presence of chemtrails in original motion pictures that were produced and released many years ago.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 08, 2011 @ 16:07:28
Mr. Sinclair, the keywords in your comment are “if seen.” That’s just it; people are NOT seeing them, as I explained in the article and in my comments, here. I, myself, am an example of someone who never saw them, until 2008. But, there were others who HAD seen them earlier than that, including yourself, and this proves that my not seeing them was due to some factor (I mentioned mass-electromagnetic mind control) that seems to prevent people from seeing them. If I’m right about that, and I seem to be, given the testimony of millions of people all over the world, then that would explain why you and your hippie friends don’t recall seeing them back then.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 08, 2011 @ 16:01:57
Max, you misunderstood my comment. I’m not denying your example of obvious current digital manipulations, for a TV commercial. That is not the same thing as chemtrails appearing in the original footage. I’m not talking about digital manipulations done in the last few years on TV. Since the all-digital TV signal was mandated, of course it’s possible to manipulate current broadcasts. But, the clip of the “Duel” is an unaltered copy of the original movie.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 08, 2011 @ 15:57:55
Arthur, even I have a hard time believing that one. Can you point to any specific John Wayne movies? How old are the ones you’re talking about? You know that John Wayne was making movies in the 1940s, right? That would be prior to the advent of jet aircraft.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 08, 2011 @ 15:55:16
Thanks for the report, MrMetalMoney. That lends further proof of digital manipulation in current broadcasts. However, it still doesn’t support the suggestion that the originals have been altered after their initial release.
LikeLike
pockita
Jun 08, 2011 @ 13:04:25
I think both causes are true — in some cases the chemtrails were present during the original shoot and in other cases they were added in later –but mostly they were added in later. There is no need to gather up all the original copies when this alteration is done just as there is no need to hide the chemtrails themselves in the skies over our heads. The existence of “proof of the conspiracy” is immaterial since proof of many conspiracies does exist but this has no effect on the vast majority of the population because they only believe what their TV sets tell them and disbelieve everything else. There are mountains of “proof” of all sorts of criminal behavior that are continually ignored by the snoring majority so this is simply one more.
LikeLike
Mr Sinclair
Jun 08, 2011 @ 11:40:41
I remember well the first times I saw chemtrails in the late 1990’s. I was a teen in the 1970’s and amongst the people I was friends with, mostly hippies in the Bay Area, chemtrails would have been noticed and commented on if seen. I for one would have to see the VHS of Duel to be certain. BTW the earliest chemtrails I recall seeing on screen were in episodes of the Simpsons.
LikeLike
Max
Jun 08, 2011 @ 07:30:03
Gary Rea,
“Those of you who insist these are effects that were added in after these films were released are simply mistaken.”
Then how do you explain the video comparison of the Railway Children? The chemtrail was clearly not in the original and yet appears in the Virgin Trains commercial. Seems pretty cut and dried to my mind.
LikeLike
Arthur
Jun 08, 2011 @ 06:42:05
I have seen the sky covered in chemtrails in old John Wayne western movies, so these chemtrails go back a lot further than we think, how far I wonder?
LikeLike
Stiri scurte: 08.06.2011 « George Valah Blog
Jun 08, 2011 @ 05:45:00
mistermetalmoney
Jun 08, 2011 @ 03:25:25
Rocky II cable version shows quite a few chemtrails whereas in the original version there are no chemtrails in the same exact skies over Rocky and Adrian’s heads.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 08, 2011 @ 02:32:39
Yet another factor in the shooting of all three of the examples I’ve show here is that there was a very consciously deliberate framing of the scenes so as to include great expanses of the sky. The camera work in “White Sands” is a shot looking up at the chemtrail, the rock and the sun. There are many shots in the Simple Minds music video that are deliberately looking up at the sky, with a wide-angle lens to take in the view. In “Duel,” the scenes are mostly shot from a low-angle viewpoint, including the sky. If the chemtrails were dubbed in years later, did the storyboard artists and directors anticipate the addition of digital effects – which didn’t exist yet?
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 08, 2011 @ 02:24:45
Bill, while it may be that TV showings of movies are altered (explaining why they went to an all digital signal), that doesn’t explain away the examples I’ve linked to in the article (“White Sands” and the Simple Minds video), and certainly doesn’t apply to “Duel.” If anyone can show me a copy of the same scenes that doesn’t include the same sky, I’ll accept that the DVD this clip was copied from (by whomever uploaded it to the torrent site I downloaded it from) was altered during the production of the DVDs, years after release of the movie. But, to prove your case, you’d have to obtain a VHS tape of the movie, or have had one in your possession since the early eighties, when VHS cassettes were introduced. Go ahead…I’ll wait.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 08, 2011 @ 02:15:43
Wakeup2012, the movie “Cars” is a digital animation and the chemtrails in that film were deliberately created when the film was made, in the first place. They weren’t “added” later.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 08, 2011 @ 02:13:53
Mote, if you check your old VHS copies and see that they contain the same trails, will that indicate someone broke into your house and swapped your copy for a “doctored” one? 😉
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 08, 2011 @ 02:11:31
Joe, for you to doubt these are chemtrails and then admit that “Billy Jack,,” also made in 1971, shows chemtrails is rather self-defeating.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 08, 2011 @ 02:05:28
With all due respect for everyone’s opinions, I am sensing a great deal of anxiety and denial, here. I share your viewpoint, though, as I had the same reaction to those who say these aerosol spraying missions began in the sixties (some even say the fifties). Like you, I maintained that I had never seen such a thing in my childhood years, or growing up, or in my younger adulthood, either. However, as I said, the testimony of others – as well as the photographic evidence, shows that, while I didn’t begin seeing them until January 2008, they were, nevertheless, there.
Those of you who insist these are effects that were added in after these films were released are simply mistaken. Think about it. When a motion picture production is released for public viewing, there are literally hundreds of prints made and sent out to theaters all over the nation and the world. That’s to say nothing of the thousands of VHS tapes and DVDs issued for sale and rental. So, if these trails are being added years after the release of these movies, it would entail the impossible task of somehow rounding up every single copy ever made and then digitally dropping in the changes. I submit that this would be absurdly impossible, given the number of copies in private hands. It would only take one missed copy to blow the lid off the “conspiracy.”
Those of you who maintain that these are not, in fact, chemtrails at all should spend some time comparing the footage to known and accepted videos of chemtrails, as well as still images of chemtrails. I have and I have confirmed that these are, indeed, chemtrails. As I’ve pointed out already, the final scene with the truck is an obvious case in point.
LikeLike
Joe
Jun 08, 2011 @ 01:31:34
I don’t think these are Chemtrails. They could be. For another 1971 movie with chemtrails, check out Billy Jack with Tom Loughlin.
LikeLike
mote
Jun 08, 2011 @ 01:30:30
Time to check your old VHS copies to confirm these skies really were there.
I agree: these are superimposed as the light on the road and environment is from a completely blue sky. There were no trails in the 70’s and people would have asked wtf was wrong with the sky if they saw that movie then.
LikeLike
WakeUp2012
Jun 08, 2011 @ 01:29:47
Watch “Cars” by Walt Disney (666 Company) and they were added to the animation for the kids to see and get used to them.
LikeLike
Joe Parish
Jun 08, 2011 @ 01:29:37
I don’t believe these are chemtrails. They could be. Another film from 1971 you should check is Billy Jack, I believe with Tom Loughlin. It definitely has chemtrails in this movie.
LikeLike
Ben
Jun 08, 2011 @ 00:57:17
Unfortunately they have arrived full force in Brazil. I first saw them blowing over Fortaleza Ceara from the north east.
In 2007 I saw a huge operation over southern Bahia and into Minas. The last few years we have seen many over Salvador Bahia without fail.
LikeLike
bill
Jun 07, 2011 @ 23:55:31
Chemtrails were not in the originals. I recently saw T2 on tv and there is a ct in the desert scene. It is NOT on the original dvd (1992). I also saw the Bad News Bears on tv a few months ago and there was a trail in a mound scene with Walter and Jodi. It is NOT on the original VHS, I know, I have it. These shows are being intentionally altered to give stupids something to claim CT’s have been around forever. Not.
LikeLike
Joe
Jun 07, 2011 @ 22:36:55
I was watching an episode of Gun Smoke and the sky was filled with chemtrails. There were no chemtrails in the original and these had been added at a later point in time.
LikeLike
Ron
Jun 07, 2011 @ 22:32:09
Almost every show on the U.S. cable networks including even the FOOD Network show chemtrails in almost every outdoor scene. The first time i saw them myself, i was standing under a huge X made of chemtrails the day before the Toronto Irag war protest sometime before the invasion in 2003. It is unbelievable how often they show chemtrails on T.V. and in movies, obviously with the consent of the producers/directors. The directors frame the chemtrails in the sky perfectly while the character is talkiing on whatever show it is. There must be some chemtrail shot framing class given somewhere and if these guys deny ever doing that on purpose they are full of crap ( i was just following orders) . If i had my head up my butt i probably wouldn’t notice but someone who even seen 1 pic on the internet can spot it a mile away. People should start taking screen captures of popular shows hopefully with Network logo and posting them to the web, then start boycotting those Networks and companies that advertise on them. I am sick of the propaganda on TV news and have boycotted CNN for several years and if i find out any products i use advertise on CNN i will never buy that again. Wake up and lets get a answer what the hell are those chemtrails for and if the Goverments/Corporations don’t tell us then they should be kicked out and put on trail for harming those they are supposed to protect.
LikeLike
Lynn
Jun 07, 2011 @ 22:25:11
Great observation and thankyou for helping to shine light in the darkness. I’m of the opinion that this aerosol spray was added to the Dennis Weaver film after the fact and wasn’t there originally because I do remember the skies when I was younger and there were no tic tac toe clouds and stripes in the skies until around the mid to late nineties. I noticed them all the time but I (ignorantly) thought they were some kind of new ‘contrail’ and they were there because air travel had greatly increased but we all know that’s not really the case. The truth is they are spraying us like insects!
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 07, 2011 @ 22:21:46
MX, there may be such an agenda to make us believe chemtrails have always been there, or rather, to make us believe they are “normal” phenomena that have always existed. However, the “Duel” clip is excerpted directly from a torrent download of the original film and has been unedited by me, except to excerpt this portion from the rest of the film. The watermark in the center of the image is from the demo version of the video editor I was using. Other than that, this is the original film, as it was released in 1971.
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 07, 2011 @ 22:13:48
Roy, chemtrails are typically blown by the wind until they resemble Cirrus clouds. In fact, though, on many days, everywhere in the world, clear skies are covered with chemtrails and, within hours, look like “clouds.” I’ve been observing and documenting this, myself, since 2008, first hand, and millions worldwide have documented it since at least the 1990s.
Look, especially, at the last shot of the truck, near the end of the clip. Look at the very obvious and quite distinct trails at the left of the frame. These are certainly not “Cirrus clouds.”
LikeLike
Gary Rea
Jun 07, 2011 @ 22:08:06
Shirley, are you aware of the various connections between the entire “entertainment industry” and the Freemasons and CIA? Spielberg, himself an Ashenazi Jew (Google that, plus “Khazars”), is certainly well connected with with the NWO elite, being a principle part of the media, himself.
http://informationfarm.blogspot.com/2010/02/inside-lc-strange-but-mostly-true-story.html
The CIA even admits it…sort of:
https://www.cia.gov/offices-of-cia/public-affairs/entertainment-industry-liaison/index.html
LikeLike
p. shelly
Jun 07, 2011 @ 21:36:55
wow, thanks, I know it has been going on since 80s but not this early, these are chemical clouds though and chemtrails, you are correct. this was started out west, now we are getting tremendous heavy spray here in the east, specifically N.C. this is where i live so I can only account for here on a daily basis. It is horrific, and the masses are blind to it. things keep changing. the weather/jet stream is being heavily modified, I can see by the satellite and radar images, this began in earnest last fall.
Programs were begun first in Europe in the 80s, then in the US in the 90s by NASA to brainwash K through 12 with this, check out sCool. they show these in picts saying they are normal and clouds.
this is enough to make one sick:
http://science-edu.larc.nasa.gov/SCOOL/cloud-of-the-month.php
http://science-edu.larc.nasa.gov/SCOOL/index.php
LikeLike
Becky
Jun 07, 2011 @ 21:36:29
The more we think they are normal the less they think we wont question all the crap we breathe in daily
LikeLike
Roy
Jun 07, 2011 @ 21:28:02
Cirrus clouds ONLY in ‘The Duel’ sequence. You called that one wrong.
LikeLike
Max
Jun 07, 2011 @ 21:22:38
Hi,
I found a link to this page on Rense.com.
I’m sure that the Chemtrails weren’t in the original and were added after the fact. The same thing was discovered in a Virgin Media Commercial in 2005 which used a clip from the 1970 film, The Railway Children, in which a Chemtrail was added. A good compare and contrast of the original to the advert can be seen at
IMHO, their’s an obvious agenda behind the post production insertion of Chemtrails into the old movies. Obviously they want us to believe that they’ve always been there… when we all know they haven’t. My concern, given the analysis by Clifford Carnicom et al, is that Chemtrails are a visible component of the implementation of Agenda 21; an ongoing attempt to depopulate.
The first Chemtrail I saw was back in 1998. I stepped out of a plane in Munich, Germany and couldn’t believe the checkerboard of Chemtrails in the Sky above the city. I’ve seen them in every county in Europe since that time and over here in the UK they’re a daily sight. Didn’t see any in Brazil in 2005 though. I believe they may be limited to only spraying in NATO member countries.
Isn’t it telling that our governments always have money to wage war and bail out the banksters and plenty stashed away for the billions it must cost to spray the sky’s of dozens of countries with poisons, and yet they never have enough to provide good healthcare or to take care the old, nor for real education. It way past time to start judging them solely on their actions because it’s plain to see that their words mean absolutely nothing.
What amazes me the most is that the majority of people I speak to about Chemtrails don’t even think they’re out of the ordinary. I guess the mercury amalgam and the fluoride finally take their toll.
Peace
Thanks for the article.
Mx
LikeLike
Shirley
Jun 07, 2011 @ 21:16:12
Chemtrails has nothing to do with Hollywood. I know who are laying the chemtrails. I have hundreds of pictures of Chemtrails lain over my house daily.
Google ” Paranormal Viewer” and check out my photos. The ones whose paranormal photos I have pictures of are the ones laying the Chemtrails.
LikeLike