With any governmental agency, the words used in any law, regulation, rule or other declaration by the government or its agencies must be carefully scrutinized. What may seem to be nothing more than a simple word-swap may actually be a new legal definition and one that may come back to haunt you. Under NAIS the term [property] is swapped for Premises.
Property is the term used to indicate private ownership of a thing such as land or animals and is protected by rights in the Constitution. It does signify legal ownership, and who is the legal owner and allows you access to a Civil Court and protection under the Constitution.
Premises is a term derived from the International Law of Contracts which are the international rules, for conducting business, usually corporate, whereby [non-human entities] are declared to be [persons]. Agreeing to the redefining of [property] and to the conversion to premises, eliminates civil protections and redefines you as an [legal entity] who may or may not own the thing in question. This also subjects you to Administrative Courts using statute and codes which are derived from the International Law of Contracts (ILC) and prohibits any use of rights enumerated or otherwise within the constitution.
NAIS is a contract!
Any time you sign your name to any government program you have effectively entered into a contract. NAIS is a contractual agreement between you, the individual land owner/livestock owner, and the USDA acting as agent for the federal government, or your state agriculture department acting as agent. Using the ILC’s own rules, no contract is valid unless all parties are fully apprised of ALL provisions and terms of the contract.
NAIS has intentionally not revealed ALL aspects of the contract, or the real intent of the program. This renders any attempts to mandate compliance as null and void.
Neither the government nor its agencies or agents have listed any limits with regard to any authority any or all of them may now assume or implement as a result of rule making or changes to policies, mandates and regulations. This means you do NOT know all the terms of the contract.
Neither is NAIS an [adhesion contract] wherein the terms and conditions of the contract never, ever change because USDA or even Congress can change the rules and regulations at any time.
Since the USDA is a self regulating and rule making agency, in effect making its own laws and enforcing them at will, rules could be changed at a later date drastically affecting everyone who has entered into this contract.
When those of you who [voluntarily] signed up for Premises ID and animal registration signed your name to what is a contract between you and the Federal government, did you not notice the contract provided no limitations or restrictions regarding the authority you just conveyed to the Federal government?
Did you notice not one word was said about limiting the actions of agencies such as the USDA and no protections against unwarranted search and seizure or other legal actions were afforded to you?
So what did you actually sign up for?
Voluntarily or even by forced mandate, you have given up your rights to your own property and, in exchange, you got what? Were you compensated? Is there any intent to compensate you? The answers are no. In fact the cost of NAIS is being passed on to the people being victimized by yet another Federal program, the intent of which is to seize all farm and ranch lands and all livestock, putting all of it under Federal control.
In the end, we need to understand that property has a far different meaning under the laws than the word [premises]. Had there not been an intention to render a change in the status of property ownership and control there would have been no need to use the word Premises. Rep Colin Peterson (D) MN and Sen. Tom Harkin (D) IA, didn’t slip this word in there accidentally.
In fact, there are a few things neither of them ever mentioned. Most specifically neither mentions the fact that all the lands being consigned to the control of the USDA will be added to the US Lands Preservation Act, now before congress. Supposedly more than 150 various bills from nearly every state just showed up at once and were rolled into one omnibus land package. Go figure. What a coincidence.
Why is this important?
All heritage lands including national parks and reserves, wetlands preserves, forests, waterways and wildlife preserves and other non-specific land holdings are owned by the federal government, although the government is prohibited from owning any land other than what is needed to operate, within the Constitution. Now they intend to seize control of your farm or ranch land.
All of the land being claimed by the federal government including the lands being seized under the National Animal Identification System are being used to collateralize the funds borrowed to bail out Wall Street.
The US Lands Preservation Act is nothing more than the official collecting and cataloguing of all federally held lands which will now be used to swap debt for assets. Your land, once registered for NAIS will also be listed as an asset in this debt.
And you thought this was about national security, export development, disease and food safety.
© 2009 Marti Oakley
NAIS: Still the greatest threat to family ranchers and herders « The PPJ Gazette
Oct 22, 2010 @ 20:10:19
Corrinne Novak
Feb 11, 2009 @ 16:01:58
I believe in FACTS not conspiracies, so I discounted Derry Brownfield’s article even though he is spot on about Monsanto.
http://www.newswithviews.com/brownfield/brownfield59.htm “…Wayne Hage …was explaining the World Bank, the International Monetary fund and how the world bankers planned on collateralizing the world debt with land….”
But the 840 livestock tag prefix goes back to the World bank and the UN. http://www.unu.edu/hq/library/resource/WITSdoc/WITS_HELP.pdf
Then there is the MAP. Blue areas are normal use areas, red is no humans Yellow sections regulated, government managed activities
Explanation: http://www.newswithviews.com/Shaw/michael119.htm
Now there is your article, and the information below. Guess it is NOT a conspiracy theory there are too many FACTS supporting collusion between the UN, World Bank and those in power in the USA. Check out Maurice Strong, Secretary General to the United Nations, advisor to the World Bank, protégé of David Rockefeller.
Land,…, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals… Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice;…” – from the Vancouver Action Plan, Recommendations for National Action [1976]…” http://ww2.unhabitat.org/hd/hdv9n4/4.asp
“…In 1976, the U.S. government signed a UN document (above) that declared: Land … cannot be treated as an ordinary asset;….. The meaning of sustainable development… was codified in another U.N. document called “Agenda 21,” which was signed by President George H.W. Bush in 1992….” http://freedom.org/reports/human-settlements/index.html
Millinium Project:
“ The Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) was launched in May 1998 and adopted in June and November 2001 by ESA and the EU Councils, respectively. It is an initiative to promote sustainable development and global governance through the supporting of environmental and security policies…… In addition, FAO provides support to the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and the World Food Programme (WFP) for their field project activities as well as to the World Bank concerning guidelines on harmonization and standardization…”
http://www.envirosecurity.org/espa/PDF/IES_ESA_CS_Overview_of_International_Mapping_and_Monitoring_Initiatives.pdf
In the USA..”There are currently six Regional Commissions in place, or pending final approval,..Few realize the growing influence they have over the lives of ordinary people, by providing the mechanism through which appointed individuals, rather than elected officials, develop public policy….”
C:\Matt Files\State Association
S TAT E ASSOCIATIONS OF R E G I O N A L COUNCILS OF GOVERNMENT & R E G I O N A L DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS: …
… from the state’s six regional development organizations, known in …
http://nado.org/resources/statereport.pdf • Thursday, 22 December 2005, 7:49pm GMT • 1512.3k
Source: http://www.statesurge.com/category/12388
Source: http://www.nado.org/rf/innocenters/envstew.php
Source: http://clinton4.nara.gov/PCSD/
The regional governance concept began in earnest with the Clinton-Gore administration. On the heels of the President’s Council on Sustainable Development , came the President’s Community Empowerment Board, chaired by Vice President Al Gore,
Source: http://www.epa.gov/history/topics/reinvent/03.htm
Source: http://www.empowerment.state.ia.us/common/pdf/fall_train/board_responsibilities.pdf
Using the data collected ..the Delta Regional Commission directs federal funds to projects which meet the principles of “sustainable development.”
IV. STATEMENT OF MUTUAL INTEREST AND MUTUAL BENEFITS
The participating agencies are dedicated to providing assistance for the sustainable development of American communities. The complexity of the Delta’s needs warrants a continued effort of examination and action.
Source: http://www.mdgc.us/delta_vision_delta_voices_appendices
During the 1990s the FAO launched a Global Strategy for the Management of Farm Animal Genetic Resources (CGRFA) to respond to these concerns.
The civil society groups supported the concept of COLLECTIVE RIGHTS as a solution. In the Wilderswil Declaration, they stressed that “OWNERSHIP, knowledge and innovation at the community level are often of a COLLECTIVE NATURE. Therefore local knowledge and biodiversity CAN ONLY BE PROTECTED AND PROMOTED THROUGH COLLECTIVE RIGHTS. http://www.ictsd.org/biores/07-09-21/story1.htm
“…the United States and the European Union have signed up to a new transatlantic economic partnership that will see regulatory standards “harmonized” and will lay the basis for a merging of the US and EU into one single market, a huge step on the path to a new globalized world order. The BBC reported (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6607757.stm) from the Summit in Washington on Monday:
The two sides agreed to set up an “economic council” to push ahead with regulatory convergence in nearly 40 areas, including intellectual property, financial services, business takeovers and the motor industry.” Source: http://stopspp.com/stopspp/?p=122
Here comes Fascism, Communism, Socialism Feudalism or what ever other name you want to give to a system of elites and serfs. When you are a serf the name doesn’t matter ask the Ukrainians http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/11/24/europe/EU_GEN_Ukraine_Great_Famine.php?page=1
LikeLike
Robin
Jan 16, 2009 @ 02:15:48
Very Interesting.
LikeLike